Business person's rights
+2
sodaknomad
nightlight88
6 posters
Page 1 of 1
Business person's rights
SB 66 and SB 67 are two bills introduced to protect clergy from being force to perform qu-eer marriage and to protect business owners when they decide they don't want to participate in qu-eer marriages.
Contact your representatives and senators and tell them you support these two bills.
Contact your representatives and senators and tell them you support these two bills.
nightlight88- Posts : 1680
Join date : 2012-12-25
Re: Business person's rights
I've already done so, and posted this same message on my FB wall.
I'd like to see SB 66 amended to add protections to State, county and municipal officials and anyone else the law allows to officiate marriages. I believe we all need protection from the militant que-ers and their satanic leftist supporters.
I'd like to see SB 66 amended to add protections to State, county and municipal officials and anyone else the law allows to officiate marriages. I believe we all need protection from the militant que-ers and their satanic leftist supporters.
sodaknomad- Posts : 768
Join date : 2012-12-31
Age : 62
Location : High above the James River...and anywhere else
Re: Business person's rights
sodaknomad wrote:I've already done so, and posted this same message on my FB wall.
I'd like to see SB 66 amended to add protections to State, county and municipal officials and anyone else the law allows to officiate marriages. I believe we all need protection from the militant que-ers and their satanic leftist supporters.
Thanks for your support of these two important bills.
nightlight88- Posts : 1680
Join date : 2012-12-25
Re: Business person's rights
SB67 has been withdrawn from the docket.
But SB 128 will have the sodomites in a tizzy. Basically it says that no lawsuits against people who express their views on homosexuality, no lawsuits against businesses who don't want to serve qu-eers.
I wrote my legislators asking them to support this bill.
But SB 128 will have the sodomites in a tizzy. Basically it says that no lawsuits against people who express their views on homosexuality, no lawsuits against businesses who don't want to serve qu-eers.
I wrote my legislators asking them to support this bill.
nightlight88- Posts : 1680
Join date : 2012-12-25
Re: Business person's rights
My
nightlight88 wrote:SB67 has been withdrawn from the docket.
But SB 128 will have the sodomites in a tizzy. Basically it says that no lawsuits against people who express their views on homosexuality, no lawsuits against businesses who don't want to serve qu-eers.
I wrote my legislators asking them to support this bill.
My legislator wrote back and said he couldn't believe the nasty comments and threats he got from some constituents. Looks like the Sodomites are in full force here in SD as well.
nightlight88- Posts : 1680
Join date : 2012-12-25
Re: Business person's rights
nightlight88 wrote:
Mynightlight88 wrote:SB67 has been withdrawn from the docket.
But SB 128 will have the sodomites in a tizzy. Basically it says that no lawsuits against people who express their views on homosexuality, no lawsuits against businesses who don't want to serve qu-eers.
I wrote my legislators asking them to support this bill.
My legislator wrote back and said he couldn't believe the nasty comments and threats he got from some constituents. Looks like the Sodomites are in full force here in SD as well.
Nasty is as nasty does.....
Sodomy IS nasty and is nothing but a perversion.
BladeRunner- Posts : 1922
Join date : 2012-12-21
Re: Business person's rights
nightlight88 wrote:
My legislator wrote back and said he couldn't believe the nasty comments and threats he got from some constituents. Looks like the Sodomites are in full force here in SD as well.
One of my legislators went the opposite direction. I guess I'll always be a Bible thunping caveman who refuses to believe it's 2014AD insteead of 2014BC.
sodaknomad- Posts : 768
Join date : 2012-12-31
Age : 62
Location : High above the James River...and anywhere else
Re: Business person's rights
As the duck commander stated: "A man's penis doesn't belong in another man's anus". nuff said.
Darth Cheney- Posts : 3557
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD
Re: Business person's rights
Qu-eer is a single non-hyphenated word in most forums. Love the fix that the moderators put in place here @ JSI.
Dicks. Little dicks, at that.
Dicks. Little dicks, at that.
Shortie's Ex- Posts : 1521
Join date : 2013-02-14
Re: Business person's rights
Just saying it is oppressing our free speech. Lets start a new forum.Shortie's Lover wrote:Qu-eer is a single non-hyphenated word in most forums. Love the fix that the moderators put in place here @ JSI.
Dicks. Little dicks, at that.
Twinkies- Posts : 389
Join date : 2013-03-19
Age : 79
Re: Business person's rights
Twinkies wrote:Just saying it is oppressing our free speech. Lets start a new forum.Shortie's Lover wrote:Qu-eer is a single non-hyphenated word in most forums. Love the fix that the moderators put in place here @ JSI.
Dicks. Little dicks, at that.
Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.
nightlight88- Posts : 1680
Join date : 2012-12-25
Similar topics
» Small Business
» DANGEROUS BUSINESS
» Our Rights Do Not Come From God’
» And another business flees to Idaho
» 2013 Best and Worst States for Business
» DANGEROUS BUSINESS
» Our Rights Do Not Come From God’
» And another business flees to Idaho
» 2013 Best and Worst States for Business
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|