Serious Bible question

How was Noah able to get polar bears for his ark?

Liberal wrote:How was Noah able to get polar bears for his ark?

Amazon.com

What would a person smell like after being in a whale for three days?

If a snake told you to eat an apple, would you?

Liberal wrote:If a snake told you to eat an apple, would you?

If it was a honey crisp. Yes.

Liberal wrote:How was Noah able to get polar bears for his ark?

Polar bears are a divergent line of the brown bear.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Liberal wrote:How was Noah able to get polar bears for his ark?

Polar bears are a divergent line of the brown bear.

Their skin is black!

Darth Cheney wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Liberal wrote:How was Noah able to get polar bears for his ark?

Polar bears are a divergent line of the brown bear.

Their skin is black!

R A C I ST   ! ! !

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Liberal wrote:How was Noah able to get polar bears for his ark?

Polar bears are a divergent line of the brown bear.

Evolution?

Paquette wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Liberal wrote:How was Noah able to get polar bears for his ark?

Polar bears are a divergent line of the brown bear.

Evolution?

A bear is a bear is a bear. They're all bears.

A dog is a dog is a dog. They're all dogs.

Evilution has nothing to with it.

What would happen if one of the bears ate one of the penguins? The logistics of this whole ark deal are mind-boggling. You'd have to keep the grasshoppers away from the chickens; the chickens away from the dogs; and all of them away from the polar bears. Just imagine the massive amount of feces you'd have to clean up daily!

Paquette wrote:

Liberal wrote:If a snake told you to eat an apple, would you?

If it was a honey crisp. Yes.

I wonder if the snake talked in a normal human voice or hissy like they do in cartoons? I'm guessing he sounded like Morgan Freeman!

From the re-populate perspective, you have only two of every animal including all of the carnivores. What did they eat? Did they have to wait for other animals to reproduce before they could eat? Or did they just eat all the dead humans around that God killed in the flood?

Liberal wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Liberal wrote:If a snake told you to eat an apple, would you?

If it was a honey crisp. Yes.

I wonder if the snake talked in a normal human voice or hissy like they do in cartoons? I'm guessing he sounded like Morgan Freeman!

I'm guessing he sounded like Bobcat Goldthwait from Police Academy.

Dr. Jones wrote:

Liberal wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Liberal wrote:If a snake told you to eat an apple, would you?

If it was a honey crisp. Yes.

I wonder if the snake talked in a normal human voice or hissy like they do in cartoons? I'm guessing he sounded like Morgan Freeman!

I'm guessing he sounded like Bobcat Goldthwait from Police Academy.

I was thinking PeeWee Herman.

BladeRunner wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Liberal wrote:How was Noah able to get polar bears for his ark?

Polar bears are a divergent line of the brown bear.

Evolution?

A bear is a bear is a bear. They're all bears.

A dog is a dog is a dog. They're all dogs.

Evilution has nothing to with it.

You disagree with Gomezz?

Liberal wrote:From the re-populate perspective,  you have only two of every animal including all of the carnivores. What did they eat? Did they have to wait for other animals to reproduce before they could eat? Or did they just eat all the dead humans around that God killed in the flood?

Must be a slow day in Sodomville.

Why would the polar bears have had to been on the Ark? The North Pole has no land mass, so the ice pack would have floated on top of the flood waters just as it floats on the water today.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Why would the polar bears have had to been on the Ark? The North Pole has no land mass, so the ice pack would have floated on top of the flood waters just as it floats on the water today.

Interesting and insightful thought! But the Bible clearly states that every living thing not on the ark was killed, so he would have needed a couple polar bears (unless, of course, they evolved from another present day bear).

Also, wouldn't that mean that there's a chance some Eskimos survived as well?

Interesting discussion everyone, but I'd also like to hear more takes on what that talking snake sounded like.

LOL, don't be so literal.

Liberal wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Why would the polar bears have had to been on the Ark? The North Pole has no land mass, so the ice pack would have floated on top of the flood waters just as it floats on the water today.

Interesting and insightful thought! But the Bible clearly states that every living thing not on the ark was killed, so he would have needed a couple polar bears (unless, of course, they evolved from another present day bear).

Also, wouldn't that mean that there's a chance some Eskimos survived as well?

Interesting discussion everyone, but I'd also like to hear more takes on what that talking snake sounded like.

Do eskimos live on the ice pack?

Liberal wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Why would the polar bears have had to been on the Ark? The North Pole has no land mass, so the ice pack would have floated on top of the flood waters just as it floats on the water today.

Interesting and insightful thought! But the Bible clearly states that every living thing not on the ark was killed, so he would have needed a couple polar bears (unless, of course, they evolved from another present day bear).

Also, wouldn't that mean that there's a chance some Eskimos survived as well?

Interesting discussion everyone, but I'd also like to hear more takes on what that talking snake sounded like.

A lot like you actually...

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Do eskimos live on the ice pack?

They sure would if the land was flooding and it was the only way to survive.

The real question is, would the ice pack survive the flood? Wouldn't the ice cap float free after being lifted up nearly 30,000 feet above the previous sea level and be pushed away from it's polar location and into the tropics?

Liberal wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Why would the polar bears have had to been on the Ark? The North Pole has no land mass, so the ice pack would have floated on top of the flood waters just as it floats on the water today.

Interesting and insightful thought! But the Bible clearly states that every living thing not on the ark was killed, so he would have needed a couple polar bears (unless, of course, they evolved from another present day bear).

Also, wouldn't that mean that there's a chance some Eskimos survived as well?

Interesting discussion everyone, but I'd also like to hear more takes on what that talking snake sounded like.

Since you are the forum expert maybe you can tell me where it mentions the word 'snake' in the garden of Eden or that the fruit was an apple.

Liberal wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Why would the polar bears have had to been on the Ark? The North Pole has no land mass, so the ice pack would have floated on top of the flood waters just as it floats on the water today.

Interesting and insightful thought! But the Bible clearly states that every living thing not on the ark was killed, so he would have needed a couple polar bears (unless, of course, they evolved from another present day bear).

But why save ants, flies, and mosquitos?