More Faux Snooze B.S.

Page 3 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Caitlyn Piltover on Tue Feb 10, 2015 12:24 pm

Jammer wrote:
WRONG - free market capitalism works as long as there is no government intervention (Note - I did not say "regulation").  Government intervention destroys capitalism and then liberal loony tunes come along and say something like "capitalism doesn't' work".

It is very simple, when it is easier to buy influence than it is to compete or it is easier to rig the system than it is to innovate, companies succumb to human nature and take the path of least resistance.  The result is that capitalism does not work that well thanks to the politicians and government intervention.  The end result is the loss of prosperity for everyone, even stupid ass liberals who don't believe in capitalism.

Free market capitalism only works as long as innovation will drive competition. When that company that started to innovate and gained a foot hold in the major area is where the regulation needs to come into play. The problem we are currently having is since the larger companies do not have any regulations preventing them from becoming such large players, which is why the seed industry, telecoms, and oil have such a firm grip on those technologies and related fields. I don't know the solution or the players well enough in the seed industry, but as for telecoms Google is trying to shake that up and with oil we can thank Tesla for their shake up in addition to the Fracking up in ND.
avatar
Caitlyn Piltover

Posts : 257
Join date : 2015-02-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Jammer on Tue Feb 10, 2015 6:08 pm

Caitlyn Piltover wrote:
Jammer wrote:
WRONG - free market capitalism works as long as there is no government intervention (Note - I did not say "regulation").  Government intervention destroys capitalism and then liberal loony tunes come along and say something like "capitalism doesn't' work".

It is very simple, when it is easier to buy influence than it is to compete or it is easier to rig the system than it is to innovate, companies succumb to human nature and take the path of least resistance.  The result is that capitalism does not work that well thanks to the politicians and government intervention.  The end result is the loss of prosperity for everyone, even stupid ass liberals who don't believe in capitalism.

Free market capitalism only works as long as innovation will drive competition. When that company that started to innovate and gained a foot hold in the major area is where the regulation needs to come into play. The problem we are currently having is since the larger companies do not have any regulations preventing them from becoming such large players, which is why the seed industry, telecoms, and oil have such a firm grip on those technologies and related fields. I don't know the solution or the players well enough in the seed industry, but as for telecoms Google is trying to shake that up and with oil we can thank Tesla for their shake up in addition to the Fracking up in ND.

Nothing you said makes any sense. The biggest role government should play in capitalism is preventing and punishing illegal activities like fraud. At the heart of many problems in our current economic system is some stupid ill conceived regulation.
avatar
Jammer

Posts : 2251
Join date : 2013-05-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Caitlyn Piltover on Tue Feb 10, 2015 7:23 pm

Jammer wrote:
Nothing you said makes any sense.  The biggest role government should play in capitalism is preventing and punishing illegal activities like fraud.  At the heart of many problems in our current economic system is some stupid ill conceived regulation.  
I think it makes sense, I'm sorry if I was unclear.

Our current government is one of the major problems with large corporations taking advantage of their ability to line government officials pockets in order to maintain their monopoly positions. That is the downside to capitalistic government from the states.
avatar
Caitlyn Piltover

Posts : 257
Join date : 2015-02-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Darth Cheney on Tue Feb 10, 2015 8:26 pm

Caitlyn Piltover wrote:
Jammer wrote:
Nothing you said makes any sense.  The biggest role government should play in capitalism is preventing and punishing illegal activities like fraud.  At the heart of many problems in our current economic system is some stupid ill conceived regulation.  
I think it makes sense, I'm sorry if I was unclear.

Our current government is one of the major problems with large corporations taking advantage of their ability to line government officials pockets in order to maintain their monopoly positions. That is the downside to capitalistic government from the states.

Your liberal/bar room talking points make zero sense and you should refrain from commenting on what you obviously have no idea what you are talking about. Try to surround yourself with successful people who understand basic economics and free market principles.
avatar
Darth Cheney

Posts : 3312
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Jammer on Tue Feb 10, 2015 10:01 pm

Caitlyn Piltover wrote:
Jammer wrote:
Nothing you said makes any sense.  The biggest role government should play in capitalism is preventing and punishing illegal activities like fraud.  At the heart of many problems in our current economic system is some stupid ill conceived regulation.  
I think it makes sense, I'm sorry if I was unclear.

Our current government is one of the major problems with large corporations taking advantage of their ability to line government officials pockets in order to maintain their monopoly positions. That is the downside to capitalistic government from the states.

It is clear that you do not understand the difference between capitalism and crony capitalism.
avatar
Jammer

Posts : 2251
Join date : 2013-05-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Caitlyn Piltover on Wed Feb 11, 2015 10:39 am

Jammer wrote:
It is clear that you do not understand the difference between capitalism and crony capitalism.  

One leads to the other unfortunately, which is why our system has lasted this century so long as it stands but is slowly sliding back into the capitalism of the 20s, if it were not for the socialist merits of government regulation we'd currently be in the same spot during the tycoons of the early 20th century.
avatar
Caitlyn Piltover

Posts : 257
Join date : 2015-02-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  nightlight88 on Wed Feb 11, 2015 11:01 am

Caitlyn Piltover wrote:
Jammer wrote:
It is clear that you do not understand the difference between capitalism and crony capitalism.  

One leads to the other unfortunately, which is why our system has lasted this century so long as it stands but is slowly sliding back into the capitalism of the 20s, if it were not for the socialist merits of government regulation we'd currently be in the same spot during the tycoons of the early 20th century.

You must be missing the liberal talking points from huffpo. You say its great to have a lot of government regulations, but those same government regulations are driving corporations out of the US into less restrictive countries. The libbies continually rail about loss of $$$ because of this, when they caused the problems to begin with.

How do you justify that?
avatar
nightlight88

Posts : 1680
Join date : 2012-12-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Caitlyn Piltover on Wed Feb 11, 2015 12:44 pm

nightlight88 wrote:
You must be missing the liberal talking points from huffpo.  You say its great to have a lot of government regulations, but those same government regulations are driving corporations out of the US into less restrictive countries.  The libbies continually rail about loss of $$$ because of this, when they caused the problems to begin with.

How do you justify that?
I said government regulation is a requirement to maintain the free market, without we will end up exactly where we were in the early 1900s. We are slowly heading that way again, but with the restrictions from the early 1900s still trying to keep things in check. We now have the FTC and FCC to help with this and if they would flex their muscle a bit more on the larger companies or force them to decentralize so they have to operate nearly separate entities it would help the market not hurt it like what was suggested.

What has really caused the removal of businesses is not the restrictions but the lack of taxation on their over seas income. If we were to tax that, it would remove a lot of incentive to move over seas.
avatar
Caitlyn Piltover

Posts : 257
Join date : 2015-02-09

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Jammer on Wed Feb 11, 2015 3:05 pm

Caitlyn Piltover wrote:
Jammer wrote:
It is clear that you do not understand the difference between capitalism and crony capitalism.  

One leads to the other unfortunately, which is why our system has lasted this century so long as it stands but is slowly sliding back into the capitalism of the 20s, if it were not for the socialist merits of government regulation we'd currently be in the same spot during the tycoons of the early 20th century.

I have read enough of your comments to realize that you are either a hardcore Marxist trying to pretend you have a moderate streak in the hopes of fooling people or you are one of the dumbest people on earth. Neither one is worthy of communicating with. A rock has more to offer society than you do.
avatar
Jammer

Posts : 2251
Join date : 2013-05-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Dr. Evil on Thu Aug 06, 2015 10:36 pm

Here's a fun video:

avatar
Dr. Evil

Posts : 3746
Join date : 2014-10-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Clicker on Mon Jul 11, 2016 9:38 am

Desperation again causes the looney lib to spam the board.....................
avatar
Clicker

Posts : 920
Join date : 2012-12-29

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Gomezz Adddams on Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 am


Jeebus, a 5yo hatchet job by an aging rock n roll magazine that hasn't been relevant for a couple of decades.
avatar
Gomezz Adddams

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2012-12-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Skeptical on Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:46 am


Who gives an aeronautical intercourse about motivating rocks ??
avatar
Skeptical

Posts : 2653
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : Right here

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Dr. Evil on Wed Jul 20, 2016 10:50 am

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Jeebus, a 5yo hatchet job by an aging rock n roll magazine that hasn't been relevant for a couple of decades.

Hatchet job?  I doubt that.  I'm sure ol' Roger was grinning ear to ear while reading that article, knowing all his hard work hadn't gone unnoticed.
avatar
Dr. Evil

Posts : 3746
Join date : 2014-10-01

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Shortie's Ex on Wed Jul 20, 2016 1:40 pm


LOL. Nixon's guy is just like ... Nixon.
avatar
Shortie's Ex

Posts : 1146
Join date : 2013-02-14

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Shortie's Ex on Wed Jul 20, 2016 2:10 pm

http://justsayingit.forumotion.com/t2030-roger-ailes-pig#21864

Jammer wrote:... a sexual encounter with somebody as dashing as Ailes...

From Rolling Stone article:
Rolling Stone wrote:The 71-year-old Ailes ... : bald and obese, with dainty hands, Hitchcockian jowls and a lumbering gait.

Yah, sounds 'dashing'.  A real dreamboat.  With small hands.  LOL.
avatar
Shortie's Ex

Posts : 1146
Join date : 2013-02-14

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Jammer on Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:57 pm

Shortie's Ex wrote:http://justsayingit.forumotion.com/t2030-roger-ailes-pig#21864

Jammer wrote:... a sexual encounter with somebody as dashing as Ailes...

From Rolling Stone article:
Rolling Stone wrote:The 71-year-old Ailes ... : bald and obese, with dainty hands, Hitchcockian jowls and a lumbering gait.

Yah, sounds 'dashing'.  A real dreamboat.  With small hands.  LOL.

Light years beyond your reach. You sound a little jealous.
avatar
Jammer

Posts : 2251
Join date : 2013-05-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Darth Cheney on Wed Jul 20, 2016 6:50 pm

Shortie's Ex wrote:http://justsayingit.forumotion.com/t2030-roger-ailes-pig#21864

Jammer wrote:... a sexual encounter with somebody as dashing as Ailes...

From Rolling Stone article:
Rolling Stone wrote:The 71-year-old Ailes ... : bald and obese, with dainty hands, Hitchcockian jowls and a lumbering gait.

Yah, sounds 'dashing'.  A real dreamboat.  With small hands.  LOL.

We all know the integrity of the Rolling Stones don't we?
avatar
Darth Cheney

Posts : 3312
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Gomezz Adddams on Wed Jul 20, 2016 7:34 pm

Darth Cheney wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:http://justsayingit.forumotion.com/t2030-roger-ailes-pig#21864

Jammer wrote:... a sexual encounter with somebody as dashing as Ailes...

From Rolling Stone article:
Rolling Stone wrote:The 71-year-old Ailes ... : bald and obese, with dainty hands, Hitchcockian jowls and a lumbering gait.

Yah, sounds 'dashing'.  A real dreamboat.  With small hands.  LOL.

We all know the integrity of the Rolling Stones don't we?

Wrinkly old Mick Jagger couldn't keep it in his pants and his 29yo girlfriend is having his 8th child. Jeebus.
avatar
Gomezz Adddams

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2012-12-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Shortie's Ex on Thu Jul 21, 2016 8:46 am

Darth Cheney wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:http://justsayingit.forumotion.com/t2030-roger-ailes-pig#21864

Jammer wrote:... a sexual encounter with somebody as dashing as Ailes...

From Rolling Stone article:
Rolling Stone wrote:The 71-year-old Ailes ... : bald and obese, with dainty hands, Hitchcockian jowls and a lumbering gait.

Yah, sounds 'dashing'.  A real dreamboat.  With small hands.  LOL.

We all know the integrity of the Rolling Stones don't we?

Nice deflection.
avatar
Shortie's Ex

Posts : 1146
Join date : 2013-02-14

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Shortie's Ex on Thu Jul 21, 2016 8:53 am

Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:http://justsayingit.forumotion.com/t2030-roger-ailes-pig#21864

Jammer wrote:... a sexual encounter with somebody as dashing as Ailes...

From Rolling Stone article:
Rolling Stone wrote:The 71-year-old Ailes ... : bald and obese, with dainty hands, Hitchcockian jowls and a lumbering gait.

Yah, sounds 'dashing'.  A real dreamboat.  With small hands.  LOL.

We all know the integrity of the Rolling Stones don't we?

Wrinkly old Mick Jagger couldn't keep it in his pants and his 29yo girlfriend is having his 8th child. Jeebus.

Sir Mick has bristled at being labelled as a 'Conservative', but this nicely categorizes him don't you think ?
avatar
Shortie's Ex

Posts : 1146
Join date : 2013-02-14

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Darth Cheney on Thu Jul 21, 2016 6:03 pm

Shortie's Ex wrote:http://justsayingit.forumotion.com/t2030-roger-ailes-pig#21864

Jammer wrote:... a sexual encounter with somebody as dashing as Ailes...

From Rolling Stone article:
Rolling Stone wrote:The 71-year-old Ailes ... : bald and obese, with dainty hands, Hitchcockian jowls and a lumbering gait.

Yah, sounds 'dashing'.  A real dreamboat.  With small hands.  LOL.

See if you can't somehow find a way to figuring it out...
avatar
Darth Cheney

Posts : 3312
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Darth Cheney on Sat Nov 05, 2016 10:43 am


You cling to that technicality...he is only a few weeks premature.
avatar
Darth Cheney

Posts : 3312
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: More Faux Snooze B.S.

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 4 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum