Duggar parents

Page 5 of 5 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Duggar parents

Post  Just Braying It on Sun Apr 10, 2016 9:54 pm

Darth Cheney wrote:
Rusty Houser wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:...tell me what article or person said there was any incest or molestation involved?

You're joking, right?

It takes a special kind of special to try to deny anything happened when every single party involved admits it happened.

He touched her breast through a sheet...wrong but hardly molestation or incest. Keep cheering the kweers.
Am I the only one who thinks this is odd and gross? Darth thinks that rubbing up you're underage sister isn't molestation or incest?


Last edited by Ham Flower? on Sun Apr 10, 2016 10:07 pm; edited 1 time in total

Just Braying It

Posts : 983
Join date : 2013-02-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Duggar parents

Post  Just Braying It on Sun Apr 10, 2016 10:01 pm

Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Augustus Sealy wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Liberal wrote:Let's get this on record: Darth Cheney, Jammer, & Gomezz Addamezz all support an admitted child molester! How sick!

Never said I supported Duggar but thanks for putting words into my mouth you stupid fcuk stick. What I stated was, according to Arkansas law this does not fall under the definition of rape or incest and may not even be molestation. However the Kangaroo Court convened by you and Augustus Sealy aka George Rekers or whatever nom du jour he's chosen is hell bent on using the most egregious charge you can gin up. But then that's how a Liberal mob works. Unable to achieve their "justice" through the law, they instead opt for Plan B, torches and pitchforks.

What were the felony charges the state was going to bring before the three year statute of limitations prevented them from seeking justice?

Do you still think "molestation didn't even occur" even though every single party involved has admitted that molestation occurred?

I don't know as I can't find that they were. Why don't you tell us super sleuth? In order to be charged with a felony the crime would've had to have been rape or incest but since they require intercourse/penetration according to Arkansas legal definition that would've knocked those out of the equation. That leaves sexual battery but since that is only a misdemeanor that reduces your speculations and fervent hopes to ashes.

I never stated that "molestation" never occurred. I have stated that according to Arkansas law, the charge you made of rape and incest isn't applicable and there may be a good legal argument against sexual battery.  That doesn't mean that I didn't find what Duggard did appropriate or moral and as I stated earlier creepy.

However I do find the Liberals pitchfork and torch crusade somewhat unseemly and duplicitous as their cavalier attitude towards children and sex, gay sex and sex in general has served to inure the public in their views on this subject. Tell me where was the pitchfork crowd when Lena Dunham of HBO's "Girls" admitted last fall in her book "Not That Kind of a Girl" that as a 7yo she pried open her 1yo sister's labia to look at her vagina? And as a 13yo she masturbated in bed next to her now 7yo sister. Or tried to bribe her into kissing her? And yet the Liberal blogosphere tries to brush this off as innocent child sexual exploration. WTF? Suspect  

And how about this mea culpa from Dunham: “Usually this is stuff I can ignore but don’t demean sufferers, don’t twist my words, back the fudge up bros. I told a story about being a weird seven-year-old. I bet you have some too, old men, that I’d rather not hear … Sometimes I get so mad I burn right up.” So remorseful, so contrite. So close to the Duggar apology that it's eerie.
Gomezzz even justifies it in his worldly mind!

Just Braying It

Posts : 983
Join date : 2013-02-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Duggar parents

Post  Darth Cheney on Mon Apr 11, 2016 6:07 am

Ham Flower? wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:
Rusty Houser wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:...tell me what article or person said there was any incest or molestation involved?

You're joking, right?

It takes a special kind of special to try to deny anything happened when every single party involved admits it happened.

He touched her breast through a sheet...wrong but hardly molestation or incest. Keep cheering the kweers.
Am I the only one who thinks this is odd and gross? Darth thinks that rubbing up you're underage sister isn't molestation or incest?

Tell us your thoughts on sodomy...
avatar
Darth Cheney

Posts : 3231
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Duggar parents

Post  nightlight88 on Mon Apr 11, 2016 7:22 am

Darth Cheney wrote:
Ham Flower? wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:
Rusty Houser wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:...tell me what article or person said there was any incest or molestation involved?

You're joking, right?

It takes a special kind of special to try to deny anything happened when every single party involved admits it happened.

He touched her breast through a sheet...wrong but hardly molestation or incest. Keep cheering the kweers.
Am I the only one who thinks this is odd and gross? Darth thinks that rubbing up you're underage sister isn't molestation or incest?

Tell us your thoughts on sodomy...

Expect to be tag-teamed by Hammy, Dr Mengela, and the EX factor.
avatar
nightlight88

Posts : 1680
Join date : 2012-12-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Duggar parents

Post  Gomezz Adddams on Mon Apr 11, 2016 12:18 pm

Ham Flower? wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Augustus Sealy wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Liberal wrote:Let's get this on record: Darth Cheney, Jammer, & Gomezz Addamezz all support an admitted child molester! How sick!

Never said I supported Duggar but thanks for putting words into my mouth you stupid fcuk stick. What I stated was, according to Arkansas law this does not fall under the definition of rape or incest and may not even be molestation. However the Kangaroo Court convened by you and Augustus Sealy aka George Rekers or whatever nom du jour he's chosen is hell bent on using the most egregious charge you can gin up. But then that's how a Liberal mob works. Unable to achieve their "justice" through the law, they instead opt for Plan B, torches and pitchforks.

What were the felony charges the state was going to bring before the three year statute of limitations prevented them from seeking justice?

Do you still think "molestation didn't even occur" even though every single party involved has admitted that molestation occurred?

I don't know as I can't find that they were. Why don't you tell us super sleuth? In order to be charged with a felony the crime would've had to have been rape or incest but since they require intercourse/penetration according to Arkansas legal definition that would've knocked those out of the equation. That leaves sexual battery but since that is only a misdemeanor that reduces your speculations and fervent hopes to ashes.

I never stated that "molestation" never occurred. I have stated that according to Arkansas law, the charge you made of rape and incest isn't applicable and there may be a good legal argument against sexual battery.  That doesn't mean that I didn't find what Duggard did appropriate or moral and as I stated earlier creepy.

However I do find the Liberals pitchfork and torch crusade somewhat unseemly and duplicitous as their cavalier attitude towards children and sex, gay sex and sex in general has served to inure the public in their views on this subject. Tell me where was the pitchfork crowd when Lena Dunham of HBO's "Girls" admitted last fall in her book "Not That Kind of a Girl" that as a 7yo she pried open her 1yo sister's labia to look at her vagina? And as a 13yo she masturbated in bed next to her now 7yo sister. Or tried to bribe her into kissing her? And yet the Liberal blogosphere tries to brush this off as innocent child sexual exploration. WTF? Suspect  

And how about this mea culpa from Dunham: “Usually this is stuff I can ignore but don’t demean sufferers, don’t twist my words, back the fudge up bros. I told a story about being a weird seven-year-old. I bet you have some too, old men, that I’d rather not hear … Sometimes I get so mad I burn right up.” So remorseful, so contrite. So close to the Duggar apology that it's eerie.
Gomezzz even justifies it in his worldly mind!

Said nothing of the sort Puckenutt™, but thanks for the projection of your fevered dreams. Even with a modicum of reading comprehension, a fool such as yourself should be able comprehend that I found Duggard's actions inappropriate, immoral and creepy. However such a skill seems to be missing from your larded brain.

Ohh look, you even posted it:

"I never stated that "molestation" never occurred. I have stated that according to Arkansas law, the charge you made of rape and incest isn't applicable and there may be a good legal argument against sexual battery. That doesn't mean that I didn't find what Duggard did appropriate or moral and as I stated earlier creepy."



avatar
Gomezz Adddams

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2012-12-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Duggar parents

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 5 of 5 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum