1 in 5 American Families ...

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Have no one working.  

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/1-5-families-u-s-no-one-works/

Darth Cheney wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Have no one working.  

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/1-5-families-u-s-no-one-works/

They are called democrat voters and they are happy being destitute, living in squalor with the hopes of more government handouts if another democrat is elected. They live their lives without hope, without pride, and without accomplishment. The weird thing is this is what they keep choosing even though they are well aware of the eventual outcome. Lap up you government gravy you slugs...you will always be second class citizens.

Clicker wrote:The article doesn't clearly define "family".  I don't think it means "household" in this case.  I think it means all members of an immediate family group.  If it meant household I think the % numbers would be a lot higher due to retirees.

The 19.7 percent of families in which no one was employed means they could have either been unemployed or not in the labor force (for example, married retirees).

Dr. Jones wrote:

Clicker wrote:The article doesn't clearly define "family".  I don't think it means "household" in this case.  I think it means all members of an immediate family group.  If it meant household I think the % numbers would be a lot higher due to retirees.

Unclear?!? 

The 19.7 percent of families in which no one was employed means they could have either been unemployed or not in the labor force (for example, married retirees).

If you people would spend more time reading and less time getting your cocks lubed up for the circle jerk you might not have to get embarrassed quite so much. 

This article is meaningless and is typical conservative propaganda that actually belongs in the 'lunacy and bias in the media' section.  Unfortunately the inconvenient truth is that it means just what it says about the 19.7% figure.

Better luck next time fellas...

Clicker wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Clicker wrote:The article doesn't clearly define "family".  I don't think it means "household" in this case.  I think it means all members of an immediate family group.  If it meant household I think the % numbers would be a lot higher due to retirees.

Unclear?!? 

The 19.7 percent of families in which no one was employed means they could have either been unemployed or not in the labor force (for example, married retirees).

If you people would spend more time reading and less time getting your cocks lubed up for the circle jerk you might not have to get embarrassed quite so much. 

This article is meaningless and is typical conservative propaganda that actually belongs in the 'lunacy and bias in the media' section.  Unfortunately the inconvenient truth is that it means just what it says about the 19.7% figure.

Better luck next time fellas...

In typical kneejerk (emphasis on jerk) fashion your response is simply not answering the question or the issue.  It still doesn't DEFINE what a family is.  Family members are any blood relative whether they actually live in the same dwelling or not.  For the dim of comprehension, my wife and I live at a physical location but we have FAMILY MEMBERS who live in other physical locations.  They are still family. I can believe that there are households, those living together in a physical address, that have no working members but it's hard to believe that there are entire family groups that have no working members in the proportions stated.

Family. A family is a group of two or more persons 
residing together who are related by birth, marriage, or 
adoption. The count of families is for "primary" families only, that is, the householder and all other persons related to and residing with the householder. Families are classified either as married-couple families or as families maintained by women or men without spouses. Families include those without children as well as those with children under 18.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Have no one working.  

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/1-5-families-u-s-no-one-works/

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

The number has remained relatively steady since the Bureau of Labor Statistics started tracking this data since 1995.

Jammer wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Have no one working.  

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/1-5-families-u-s-no-one-works/

They are called democrat voters and they are happy being destitute, living in squalor with the hopes of more government handouts if another democrat is elected. They live their lives without hope, without pride, and without accomplishment. The weird thing is this is what they keep choosing even though they are well aware of the eventual outcome. Lap up you government gravy you slugs...you will always be second class citizens.

And it is all part of the grand design by the democrats.  The progressive liberal playbook has designed a system where if these people WERE TO WORK, they would lose their FREE handouts from the taxpayers.  

The evil democrats have designed the system so the handouts are just about on par with what these unskilled (also designed by the liberal educational system in this country) workers could earn.  So the net result is that these people have no intention of ever working, they are content to sell their vote to the evil progressive liberals.

When you see you liberal neighbors like the tree hugging bitch down the street, make sure you let these assholes know what you think of the system they have designed.

Skeptical wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Have no one working.  

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/1-5-families-u-s-no-one-works/

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

The number has remained relatively steady since the Bureau of Labor Statistics started tracking this data since 1995.

Hmm, anybody know what percentage of families had nobody working when LBJ declared war on poverty in 1964?

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Hmm, anybody know what percentage of families had nobody working when LBJ declared war on poverty in 1964?

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Have no one working.  

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/1-5-families-u-s-no-one-works/

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

The number has remained relatively steady since the Bureau of Labor Statistics started tracking this data since 1995.

Hmm, anybody know what percentage of families had nobody working when LBJ declared war on poverty in 1964?

I don't know if those numbers are available since the Dept of Labor has only been collecting this data since 1995. However it's interesting to note that since LBJ's War on Poverty the illegitimacy rate has exploded from 7% of American children to 41%. I can't help but surmise that welfare has had a devastating impact on marriage. With the absence of one of the wage earners and the other taking payments from the government, it's no wonder that so many families have no one working.

Jammer wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Have no one working.  

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/1-5-families-u-s-no-one-works/

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

The number has remained relatively steady since the Bureau of Labor Statistics started tracking this data since 1995.

Hmm, anybody know what percentage of families had nobody working when LBJ declared war on poverty in 1964?

I don't know if those numbers are available since the Dept of Labor has only been collecting this data since 1995. However it's interesting to note that since LBJ's War on Poverty the illegitimacy rate has exploded from 7% of American children to 41%. I can't help but surmise that welfare has had a devastating impact on marriage. With the absence of one of the wage earners and the other taking payments from the government, it's no wonder that so many families have no one working.

While the evil democrat welfare programs to hold poor people in bondage for their votes has greatly contributed to this problem, there are many that tie the root cause of this huge problem to the evil progressive liberal removal of prayer from our schools.

PREGNANCIES TO UNWED GIRLS
Under 15-19 Years of Age



The vertical line indicates the point when liberals were able to start the removal of school prayer.  The inflection point in the unwed pregnancies at that timeline indisputably shows a dramatic upward trend.  And now that the democrats have created the problem, they need to feed these kids with a welfare program that encourages more unwed pregnancies to increase the monthly amount of welfare payments.

The thing that many people neglect when they study this issue is the fact that the evil liberal invention of legal killing of preborn children would make that curve even steeper.  It is shown in the second line on the graph.

The data makes if very clear:

   LIBERALISM IS EVIL    

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Have no one working.  

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/1-5-families-u-s-no-one-works/

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

The number has remained relatively steady since the Bureau of Labor Statistics started tracking this data since 1995.

Hmm, anybody know what percentage of families had nobody working when LBJ declared war on poverty in 1964?

I don't know if those numbers are available since the Dept of Labor has only been collecting this data since 1995. However it's interesting to note that since LBJ's War on Poverty the illegitimacy rate has exploded from 7% of American children to 41%. I can't help but surmise that welfare has had a devastating impact on marriage. With the absence of one of the wage earners and the other taking payments from the government, it's no wonder that so many families have no one working.

While the evil democrat welfare programs to hold poor people in bondage for their votes has greatly contributed to this problem, there are many that tie the root cause of this huge problem to the evil progressive liberal removal of prayer from our schools.

PREGNANCIES TO UNWED GIRLS
Under 15-19 Years of Age



The vertical line indicates the point when liberals were able to start the removal of school prayer.  The inflection point in the unwed pregnancies at that timeline indisputably shows a dramatic upward trend.  And now that the democrats have created the problem, they need to feed these kids with a welfare program that encourages more unwed pregnancies to increase the monthly amount of welfare payments.

The thing that many people neglect when they study this issue is the fact that the evil liberal invention of legal killing of preborn children would make that curve even steeper.  It is shown in the second line on the graph.

The data makes if very clear:

   LIBERALISM IS EVIL    

This from too much prayer then? 

Hastert admits abusing boys
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/27/politics/dennis-hastert-sentencing/index.html

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Have no one working.  

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/1-5-families-u-s-no-one-works/

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

The number has remained relatively steady since the Bureau of Labor Statistics started tracking this data since 1995.

Hmm, anybody know what percentage of families had nobody working when LBJ declared war on poverty in 1964?

I don't know if those numbers are available since the Dept of Labor has only been collecting this data since 1995. However it's interesting to note that since LBJ's War on Poverty the illegitimacy rate has exploded from 7% of American children to 41%. I can't help but surmise that welfare has had a devastating impact on marriage. With the absence of one of the wage earners and the other taking payments from the government, it's no wonder that so many families have no one working.

While the evil democrat welfare programs to hold poor people in bondage for their votes has greatly contributed to this problem, there are many that tie the root cause of this huge problem to the evil progressive liberal removal of prayer from our schools.

PREGNANCIES TO UNWED GIRLS
Under 15-19 Years of Age



The vertical line indicates the point when liberals were able to start the removal of school prayer.  The inflection point in the unwed pregnancies at that timeline indisputably shows a dramatic upward trend.  And now that the democrats have created the problem, they need to feed these kids with a welfare program that encourages more unwed pregnancies to increase the monthly amount of welfare payments.

The thing that many people neglect when they study this issue is the fact that the evil liberal invention of legal killing of preborn children would make that curve even steeper.  It is shown in the second line on the graph.

The data makes if very clear:

   LIBERALISM IS EVIL    

This from too much prayer then? 

Hastert admits abusing boys
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/27/politics/dennis-hastert-sentencing/index.html

And what/how does that have anything to do with 1 of 5 families not having anyone working? Go start your own thread on Hastert instead of shoehorning it in here Fcukstik.

Jammer wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Have no one working.  

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

http://freebeacon.com/issues/1-5-families-u-s-no-one-works/

There were 81,410,000 families in the United States in 2015. Of those, there were 16,060,000 families in which no member was employed, or 19.7 percent of the total.

The number has remained relatively steady since the Bureau of Labor Statistics started tracking this data since 1995.

Hmm, anybody know what percentage of families had nobody working when LBJ declared war on poverty in 1964?

I don't know if those numbers are available since the Dept of Labor has only been collecting this data since 1995. However it's interesting to note that since LBJ's War on Poverty the illegitimacy rate has exploded from 7% of American children to 41%. I can't help but surmise that welfare has had a devastating impact on marriage. With the absence of one of the wage earners and the other taking payments from the government, it's no wonder that so many families have no one working.

While the evil democrat welfare programs to hold poor people in bondage for their votes has greatly contributed to this problem, there are many that tie the root cause of this huge problem to the evil progressive liberal removal of prayer from our schools.

PREGNANCIES TO UNWED GIRLS
Under 15-19 Years of Age



The vertical line indicates the point when liberals were able to start the removal of school prayer.  The inflection point in the unwed pregnancies at that timeline indisputably shows a dramatic upward trend.  And now that the democrats have created the problem, they need to feed these kids with a welfare program that encourages more unwed pregnancies to increase the monthly amount of welfare payments.

The thing that many people neglect when they study this issue is the fact that the evil liberal invention of legal killing of preborn children would make that curve even steeper.  It is shown in the second line on the graph.

The data makes if very clear:

   LIBERALISM IS EVIL    

Jammer wrote:

Jammer wrote:And you dumbass -- here is where the goal posts were before YOU moved them you simple piece of dogshit.


PREGNANCIES TO UNWED GIRLS
Under 15-19 Years of Age



But your stupid ass comment did clearly illustrate the evilness of the liberal mind.  Your approach was the same as saying:

Situation:
There is a dramatic increase in the number of bank robberies.

Liberal solution:
Demand that we teach "Avoid getting caught when you rob banks" in our school system.
Then instead of measuring the number of bank robberies committed, you begin measuring the number of bank robbers caught.

Then after a couple of decades you post a graph showing the dramatic decline in the number of BANK ROBBERS CAUGHT.

Dumbass you then proclaim that the number of bank robbers CAUGHT is at an all time low.

You EVIL MORONS are the biggest scourge on the face of the earth.

Jammer wrote:The discussion was about the role unwed pregnancies played in the subject matter.  You are literally the dumbest piece of dogshit I have ever seen.  I will not waste any more time discussing these issues with a MORON.  

You stupid piece of dogshit just keeps Googling and copying and pasting without a clue on what you are saying.  You clueless piece of doghsit are so pathetic, I notice that even Butthole and Sleazy Slut avoid you whenever possible.  I am sure that now that you are under duress, they will come to your aid, but I am sure they will be holding their nose while they are around you.