North Carolina put on Notice

Justice Department challenges North Carolina transgender law
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/04/us/north-carolina-transgender-law-challenge/index.html

Dr. Jones wrote:Justice Department challenges North Carolina transgender law
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/04/us/north-carolina-transgender-law-challenge/index.html

Here I thought liberals were all about being 'pro choice'.

Don't you agree with the 'choice' that people in NC made? And if you don't agree, why do you think that YOUR opinions should be forced on the voters of NC?

I'm for civil rights.  These people are being stripped of their civil rights.  You can't even rape and pillage fredom of religion on this one...

Dr. Jones wrote:I'm for civil rights.  These people are being stripped of their civil rights.  You can't even rape and pillage fredom of religion on this one...

Please point out where men or women are being denied the right to use the bathroom which corresponds with their inherent biological characteristics such as blacks were.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:I'm for civil rights.  These people are being stripped of their civil rights.  You can't even rape and pillage fredom of religion on this one...

Please point out where men or women are being the right to use the bathroom which corresponds with their inherent biological characteristics such as blacks were.

I'm not sure exactly what your question is.  You're kind of all over the map here.

They are being denied the right to comfortably use the bathroom, just as blacks were denied the right to comfortably use the bus, patronize a business, etc. There is no credible data whatsoever that indicates transgender people pose any more of a risk in the bathroom than the rest of the general population.  Also the law doesn't solve anything.  The akward bathroom situation still isn't fixed, and is probably actually worse.

Dr. Jones wrote:I'm for civil rights.  These people are being stripped of their civil rights.  You can't even rape and pillage fredom of religion on this one...

What civil right are they being denied?

The freedom to take a crap or a leak?

Dr. Jones wrote:They are being denied the right to comfortably use the bathroom, just as blacks were denied the right to comfortably use the bus, patronize a business, etc. There is no credible data whatsoever that indicates transgender people pose any more of a risk in the bathroom than the rest of the general population.  Also the law doesn't solve anything.  The akward bathroom situation still isn't fixed, and is probably actually worse.

Read much??

Sound familiar? 

http://orig.jacksonsun.com/civilrights/sec1_crow.shtml

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:I'm for civil rights.  These people are being stripped of their civil rights.  You can't even rape and pillage fredom of religion on this one...

Please point out where men or women are being the right to use the bathroom which corresponds with their inherent biological characteristics such as blacks were.

I'm not sure exactly what your question is.  You're kind of all over the map here.

The civil rights of blacks were basically denied because of biologically acquired genotypic traits e g black skin. Males and females also have DNA differences that manifests itself not only in their genitalia but elsewhere in the genome, differing as much as by 2 per cent between sexes which is greater than the difference between humans and chimpanzees.

Transgender individuals aren't being denied access to restrooms/dressing rooms based on their biologically acquired traits/DNA so there is no violation of any civil rights.They are being denied access because of cultural norms that dictate the segregation of restroom/changing rooms by biological sex

As I stated before, you can add parts, cut off parts but a male born a male will always be a male; a female born female will always be female. You can't change the DNA.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:I'm for civil rights.  These people are being stripped of their civil rights.  You can't even rape and pillage fredom of religion on this one...

Please point out where men or women are being the right to use the bathroom which corresponds with their inherent biological characteristics such as blacks were.

I'm not sure exactly what your question is.  You're kind of all over the map here.

The civil rights of blacks were basically denied because of biologically acquired genotypic traits e g black skin. Males and females also have DNA differences that manifests itself not only in their genitalia but elsewhere in the genome, differing as much as by 2 per cent between sexes which is greater than the difference between humans and chimpanzees.

Transgender individuals aren't being denied access to restrooms/dressing rooms based on their biologically acquired traits/DNA so there is no violation of any civil rights.They are being denied access because of cultural norms that dictate the segregation of restroom/changing rooms by biological sex

As I stated before, you can add parts, cut off parts but a male born a male will always be a male; a female born female will always be female. You can't change the DNA.

The US Civil Rights Act had absolutely nothing to do with DNA.  Sorry for the inconvenience...

Dr. Jones wrote:Sound familiar? 

http://orig.jacksonsun.com/civilrights/sec1_crow.shtml

And you know those segregated black/white bathrooms were also segregated by sex because the blacks practiced the same cultural norm of sex segregated restrooms. Go figure.

Dr. Jones wrote:They are being denied the right to comfortably use the bathroom, just as blacks were denied the right to comfortably use the bus, patronize a business, etc. There is no credible data whatsoever that indicates transgender people pose any more of a risk in the bathroom than the rest of the general population.  Also the law doesn't solve anything.  The akward bathroom situation still isn't fixed, and is probably actually worse.

Where does it say anywhere that a person taking a leak is guaranteed to be 'comfortable'?

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Sound familiar? 

http://orig.jacksonsun.com/civilrights/sec1_crow.shtml

And you know those segregated black/white bathrooms were also segregated by sex because the blacks practiced the same cultural norm of sex segregated restrooms. Go figure.

Are you going to do dick checks?

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Sound familiar? 

http://orig.jacksonsun.com/civilrights/sec1_crow.shtml

And you know those segregated black/white bathrooms were also segregated by sex because the blacks practiced the same cultural norm of sex segregated restrooms. Go figure.

Are you going to do dick checks?

What did these deviants do before this was all brought up by other reprobates?

Did they modestly slip into the bathroom and do their business? Nobody paying attention to them?

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Sound familiar? 

http://orig.jacksonsun.com/civilrights/sec1_crow.shtml

And you know those segregated black/white bathrooms were also segregated by sex because the blacks practiced the same cultural norm of sex segregated restrooms. Go figure.

Are you going to do dick checks?

What did these deviants do before this was all brought up by other reprobates?

Did they modestly slip into the bathroom and do their business?  Nobody paying attention to them?

Yes.  Although I'm sure they avoided it like the plague as I'm sure they do now.  Then Obergefell vs. Hodoes happened and everyone got their panties in a bunch, and wanted to prove a point.

Dr. Jones wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Sound familiar? 

http://orig.jacksonsun.com/civilrights/sec1_crow.shtml

And you know those segregated black/white bathrooms were also segregated by sex because the blacks practiced the same cultural norm of sex segregated restrooms. Go figure.

Are you going to do dick checks?

What did these deviants do before this was all brought up by other reprobates?

Did they modestly slip into the bathroom and do their business?  Nobody paying attention to them?

Yes.  Although I'm sure they avoided it like the plague as I'm sure they do now.  Then Obergefell vs. Hodoes happened and everyone got their panties in a bunch, and wanted to prove a point.

Hodoes?

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Sound familiar? 

http://orig.jacksonsun.com/civilrights/sec1_crow.shtml

And you know those segregated black/white bathrooms were also segregated by sex because the blacks practiced the same cultural norm of sex segregated restrooms. Go figure.

Are you going to do dick checks?

What did these deviants do before this was all brought up by other reprobates?

Did they modestly slip into the bathroom and do their business?  Nobody paying attention to them?

Yes.  Although I'm sure they avoided it like the plague as I'm sure they do now.  Then Obergefell vs. Hodoes happened and everyone got their panties in a bunch, and wanted to prove a point.

Hodoes?

Ya,  I don't know why it went to that.... anywho...

Dr. Jones wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Sound familiar? 

http://orig.jacksonsun.com/civilrights/sec1_crow.shtml

And you know those segregated black/white bathrooms were also segregated by sex because the blacks practiced the same cultural norm of sex segregated restrooms. Go figure.

Are you going to do dick checks?

What did these deviants do before this was all brought up by other reprobates?

Did they modestly slip into the bathroom and do their business?  Nobody paying attention to them?

Yes.  Although I'm sure they avoided it like the plague as I'm sure they do now.  Then Obergefell vs. Hodoes happened and everyone got their panties in a bunch, and wanted to prove a point.

I am amazed you have such intimate knowledge of the shittingandpissing habits of reprobate trannies. You must have a bunch of experience of quietly slipping into different sex bathrooms to do your business.

Dr. Jones wrote:I'm for civil rights.  These people are being stripped of their civil rights.  You can't even rape and pillage fredom of religion on this one...

"Civil rights" based on who someone "identifies" with?

OK........

Child molesters identify the way the are because they were born that way.

I suppose that is their "civil right" as well.

For that matter, some people think they are in love with their dogs and want to marry them. I suppose we should accommodate that "Civil Right"......

BladeRunner wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:I'm for civil rights.  These people are being stripped of their civil rights.  You can't even rape and pillage fredom of religion on this one...

"Civil rights" based on who someone "identifies" with?

OK........

Child molesters identify the way the are because they were born that way.

I suppose that is their "civil right" as well.

For that matter, some people think they are in love with their dogs and want to marry them. I suppose we should accommodate that "Civil Right"......

Ummm, ya.   That makes no sense.  In both cases, child molestation and beasteality there are victims.

Since you brought it up....

There is nothing I like more than a good fat steak when I get home late at night during the summer.  I usually get ours cut a strong 1 1/4 thick.  There's nothing like a steak sizzling on a hot plate while I sit down and watch a little Trevor Noah.  Anywho, long story short I am no vegetarian, but I can't help but wonder what your thoughts are on the sexual violations that our nation's beef breeding stock are subjected to?

Dr. Jones wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:I'm for civil rights.  These people are being stripped of their civil rights.  You can't even rape and pillage fredom of religion on this one...

"Civil rights" based on who someone "identifies" with?

OK........

Child molesters identify the way the are because they were born that way.

I suppose that is their "civil right" as well.

For that matter, some people think they are in love with their dogs and want to marry them. I suppose we should accommodate that "Civil Right"......

Ummm, ya.   That makes no sense.  In both cases, child molestation and beasteality there are victims.

Since you brought it up....

There is nothing I like more than a good fat steak when I get home late at night during the summer.  I usually get ours cut a strong 1 1/4 thick.  There's nothing like a steak sizzling on a hot plate while I sit down and watch a little Trevor Noah.  Anywho, long story short I am no vegetarian, but I can't help but wonder what your thoughts are on the sexual violations that our nation's beef breeding stock are subjected to?

Are you confessing to fornicating with your cows?

Darth Cheney wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:I'm for civil rights.  These people are being stripped of their civil rights.  You can't even rape and pillage fredom of religion on this one...

"Civil rights" based on who someone "identifies" with?

OK........

Child molesters identify the way the are because they were born that way.

I suppose that is their "civil right" as well.

For that matter, some people think they are in love with their dogs and want to marry them. I suppose we should accommodate that "Civil Right"......

Ummm, ya.   That makes no sense.  In both cases, child molestation and beasteality there are victims.

Since you brought it up....

There is nothing I like more than a good fat steak when I get home late at night during the summer.  I usually get ours cut a strong 1 1/4 thick.  There's nothing like a steak sizzling on a hot plate while I sit down and watch a little Trevor Noah.  Anywho, long story short I am no vegetarian, but I can't help but wonder what your thoughts are on the sexual violations that our nation's beef breeding stock are subjected to?

Are you confessing to fornicating with your cows?

You're an idiot.

Darth Cheney wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:I'm for civil rights.  These people are being stripped of their civil rights.  You can't even rape and pillage fredom of religion on this one...

"Civil rights" based on who someone "identifies" with?

OK........

Child molesters identify the way the are because they were born that way.

I suppose that is their "civil right" as well.

For that matter, some people think they are in love with their dogs and want to marry them. I suppose we should accommodate that "Civil Right"......

Ummm, ya.   That makes no sense.  In both cases, child molestation and beasteality there are victims.

Since you brought it up....

There is nothing I like more than a good fat steak when I get home late at night during the summer.  I usually get ours cut a strong 1 1/4 thick.  There's nothing like a steak sizzling on a hot plate while I sit down and watch a little Trevor Noah.  Anywho, long story short I am no vegetarian, but I can't help but wonder what your thoughts are on the sexual violations that our nation's beef breeding stock are subjected to?

Are you confessing to fornicating with your cows?

Moooooooooooo ...... ahhhhhhhh!

I just listened to a woman on the radio that said she had a son that was diagnosed with depression at four years old.  What could possibly cause depression in a four year old?  He wanted to dress like a girl, he wanted to play with girl's toys, but mom and dad said "Dammit you're a boy!"  She said they went to countless doctors, pediatricians, and therapists before one told them that they had to choose whether they wanted to have a happy daughter or a dead son.  She now has a happy teenager,  at least as happy they can be considering what life must be like for them. 

You guys can pick at that and spin it all you want,  but the science is right there, in plain sight.  Many of these people are for real, and not just a matter of "Well I identify as a blah, blah, blah ".