The Zimmerman Trial

Page 2 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  BladeRunner on Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:06 pm

What is it with the irrational libs over at GPLV discussing the outcome of this trial?

I thought it was pretty obvious that Zimmerman was innocent.
avatar
BladeRunner

Posts : 1917
Join date : 2012-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Skeptical on Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:16 pm

BladeRunner wrote:What is it with the irrational libs over at GPLV discussing the outcome of this trial?

I thought it was pretty obvious that Zimmerman was innocent.

 It isn't so much Zimmerman being found not guilty of wrongdoing beyond a reasonable doubt by the evidence presented by the prosecution as judged by a jury of peers that is putting the burr under the saddles of the racists over there but they "feel" Zimmerman failed to prove his innocence.


Last edited by Skeptical on Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:21 pm; edited 1 time in total
avatar
Skeptical

Posts : 2752
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : Right here

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Gomezz Adddams on Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:19 pm

BladeRunner wrote:What is it with the irrational libs over at GPLV discussing the outcome of this trial?

I thought it was pretty obvious that Zimmerman was innocent.

It must be in their DNA. My favorite is the claim voiced by several ignoramuses that the jury only returned a not guilty verdict due to not enough evidence being presented. In legal parlance that is called "not proven", a verdict that is not allowed in US juries. Or that Zimmerman was not proven innocent which is total bs since a not guilty verdict affirms the presumption of innocence of the accused. Bubbsie and DrJones are the worst.
avatar
Gomezz Adddams

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2012-12-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Skeptical on Mon Jul 15, 2013 10:26 pm

Gomezz Adddams wrote:
BladeRunner wrote:What is it with the irrational libs over at GPLV discussing the outcome of this trial?

I thought it was pretty obvious that Zimmerman was innocent.

It must be in their DNA. My favorite is the claim voiced by several ignoramuses that the jury only returned a not guilty verdict due to not enough evidence being presented. In legal parlance that is called "not proven", a verdict that is not allowed in US juries. Or that Zimmerman was not proven innocent which is total bs since a not guilty verdict affirms the presumption of innocence of the accused. Bubbsie and DrJones are the worst.

Don't you know the premise, "innocent until proven guilty" is old school .. the new way of thinking is the accused is guilty and the defendant must prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt.
avatar
Skeptical

Posts : 2752
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : Right here

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Darth Cheney on Tue Jul 16, 2013 6:03 am

Liberals can not tolerate the idea that people have a right to defend themselves.  Bring a gun into your defense and they completely go ballistic (pun intended). Killing an unborn in the womb is celebrated as a womyn's right but don't you dare arm yourself to protect you from danger.  It is a terrible mental disease.

Only in America can a brown guy shoot and kill a black guy and the white guy gets blamed.
avatar
Darth Cheney

Posts : 3373
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  nightlight88 on Tue Jul 16, 2013 7:27 am

Skeptical wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
BladeRunner wrote:What is it with the irrational libs over at GPLV discussing the outcome of this trial?

I thought it was pretty obvious that Zimmerman was innocent.

It must be in their DNA. My favorite is the claim voiced by several ignoramuses that the jury only returned a not guilty verdict due to not enough evidence being presented. In legal parlance that is called "not proven", a verdict that is not allowed in US juries. Or that Zimmerman was not proven innocent which is total bs since a not guilty verdict affirms the presumption of innocence of the accused. Bubbsie and DrJones are the worst.

Don't you know the premise, "innocent until proven guilty" is old school .. the new way of thinking is the accused is guilty and the defendant must prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt.

Only if you are white or look white.
avatar
nightlight88

Posts : 1680
Join date : 2012-12-25

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Gomezz Adddams on Tue Jul 16, 2013 7:53 am

Skeptical wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
BladeRunner wrote:What is it with the irrational libs over at GPLV discussing the outcome of this trial?

I thought it was pretty obvious that Zimmerman was innocent.

It must be in their DNA. My favorite is the claim voiced by several ignoramuses that the jury only returned a not guilty verdict due to not enough evidence being presented. In legal parlance that is called "not proven", a verdict that is not allowed in US juries. Or that Zimmerman was not proven innocent which is total bs since a not guilty verdict affirms the presumption of innocence of the accused. Bubbsie and DrJones are the worst.

Don't you know the premise, "innocent until proven guilty" is old school .. the new way of thinking is the accused is guilty and the defendant must prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt.

How prescient of you Skep. Check out Treyvon's bff Rachel Jeantel on Piers Morgan: "Well, the jury, they see their facts. My thoughts of the jury, they old, that's old school people. We in a new school, our generation, my generation. So --"

Yikes! What are the numbers for the next Powerball?
avatar
Gomezz Adddams

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2012-12-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Darth Cheney on Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:15 pm

Trayvon put the beating on Zimmerman because he thought he was a gay rapist...

http://drudgereport.com/flashrj.htm


Homo and leftist outrage soon to follow...well maybe not soon but sometime...well maybe sometime in the far future.  Why are homos always trying to rape little boys?
avatar
Darth Cheney

Posts : 3373
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Skeptical on Tue Jul 16, 2013 5:16 pm

Going to borrow these comments by BladeRunner over on that "other place"

I bet Obama is feeling relieved now that national attention is off of Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, NSA, his snooping on reporters, Egypt, and the unions having buyers remorse for ObamaCare.

Now attention is on the kid he said could be his.


It's his opportunity to shine for his dependent voters. He'll come to their rescue.

I wonder if an ObamaPhone is included

 Highlighted the first two because they are significant.  Anybody else notice how much attention the MSM has given to this trial and aftermath?

No doubt it will stay at the front of news exceeding that of Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, and NSA as the MSM continues to carry Obama's water and circle the wagons around him.
avatar
Skeptical

Posts : 2752
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : Right here

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  sodaknomad on Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:30 pm

Skeptical wrote:Going to borrow these comments by BladeRunner over on that "other place"

I bet Obama is feeling relieved now that national attention is off of Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, NSA, his snooping on reporters, Egypt, and the unions having buyers remorse for ObamaCare.

Now attention is on the kid he said could be his.


It's his opportunity to shine for his dependent voters. He'll come to their rescue.

I wonder if an ObamaPhone is included

 Highlighted the first two because they are significant.  Anybody else notice how much attention the MSM has given to this trial and aftermath?

No doubt it will stay at the front of news exceeding that of Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, and NSA as the MSM continues to carry his water and circle the wagons around him

My turn to confound the leftist scum over at the cesspool.

Here's what I want to know.

How many of you leftist POSes are willing to stand up and say, "I support the repeal of the Second Amendment. I don't need a weapon in the home, on the person, or in the vehicle. I'm not worried about some thug attacking me. I'll just call 911 and pee in my pants."

How many of you will say all that?
avatar
sodaknomad

Posts : 768
Join date : 2012-12-31
Age : 56
Location : High above the James River...and anywhere else

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Darth Cheney on Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:53 pm

Watched O'Blowhard on Fox tonight. He had a black guest stating guns were the problem and if they were removed, the murders would go away.  He should read the news from his homeland because they just use machetes to hack each other into pieces. Leftist scum will always turn to all problems will be solved if we outlaw guns.  There problems are just going to begin if they try.
avatar
Darth Cheney

Posts : 3373
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Skeptical on Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:43 pm

Watched and listened to an exchange of opposing opinions on Hannity.

The opposites were Juan Williams and another gentleman whose name has slipped out of my noggin.

I can usually appreciate and understand Mr. Williams viewpoint even though I may disagree him but tonight he went off the deep end much the same as a poster on "that other place"  when he said, PARAPHRASED,  even though the evidence wasn't there to prove him guilty of anything the jury should have used some compassion in their verdict.

Again there is the call to throw evidence in the gutter and give in to emotions to assign guilt or non-guilt.

Then there was all this talk from the WH that this country is a nation of laws and whatnot and what do we have now is both the President and Attorney General making noises like the feds are going after Zimmerman for no other reason then they don't like the verdict.

I wonder if they forgot a function of the DOJ ... the FBI already investigated this case over a year ago and found nothing to indicate bias or racism.
avatar
Skeptical

Posts : 2752
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : Right here

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Gomezz Adddams on Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:58 pm

Leo Terrell? Here's the exchange:

avatar
Gomezz Adddams

Posts : 2962
Join date : 2012-12-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Skeptical on Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:07 pm

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Leo Terrell? Here's the exchange:


 That's the one ... thanks.

Disregard my paraphrase of Mr. Williams words from a previous post .. you can listen to them yourself in the video.

It now isn't enough to follow the rules of law and/or evidence and be technical.......... now when the evidence for finding a defendant guilty is lacking, the verdict (as in this case), should be based upon compassion.
avatar
Skeptical

Posts : 2752
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : Right here

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Jammer on Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:54 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:Leo Terrell? Here's the exchange:


 That's the one ... thanks.

Disregard my paraphrase of Mr. Williams words from a previous post .. you can listen to them yourself in the video.

It now isn't enough to follow the rules of law and/or evidence and be technical.......... now when the evidence for finding a defendant guilty is lacking, the verdict (as in this case), should be based upon compassion.

Just another step in the progressive liberal agenda to fundamentally change this country.  They do not like the safeguards in the US Constitution, so they have progressively eroded or bypassed them until our representative republic form of government is in jeopardy of being changed to a tyrannical national government.

They have almost managed to destroy capitalism in this country as they rush into their socialist utopia.

Now they have their sights set on our judicial system.  They are not happy with our innocent until proven guilty system of justice when it doesn't suit them.

Our children and grandchildren will never enjoy the freedoms or the standard of living we did.  The progressive liberal democrats are within an eyelash of turning the greatest country on earth into a third world cesspool.

I literally can't stand the sight of a progressive liberal. They are the most disgusting despicable life forms on earth.
avatar
Jammer

Posts : 2413
Join date : 2013-05-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Just Braying It on Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:06 pm

sodaknomad wrote:
Skeptical wrote:Going to borrow these comments by BladeRunner over on that "other place"

I bet Obama is feeling relieved now that national attention is off of Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, NSA, his snooping on reporters, Egypt, and the unions having buyers remorse for ObamaCare.

Now attention is on the kid he said could be his.


It's his opportunity to shine for his dependent voters. He'll come to their rescue.

I wonder if an ObamaPhone is included

 Highlighted the first two because they are significant.  Anybody else notice how much attention the MSM has given to this trial and aftermath?

No doubt it will stay at the front of news exceeding that of Fast and Furious, Benghazi, IRS, and NSA as the MSM continues to carry his water and circle the wagons around him

My turn to confound the leftist scum over at the cesspool.

Here's what I want to know.

How many of you leftist POSes are willing to stand up and say, "I support the repeal of the Second Amendment. I don't need a weapon in the home, on the person, or in the vehicle. I'm not worried about some thug attacking me. I'll just call 911 and pee in my pants."

How many of you will say all that?

1. No, I don't support the repeal of the Second Amendment. I've never actually heard anyone say that they did.
2. Yes, I do need a gun at my house in order to keep the stray cats at bay.
3. No, I don't need a gun on my person and never have.
4. No, I don't need a gun in my vehicle. I drive my kids and other people's kids to school everyday and wouldn't be able to live with myself if something happened because I had a gun in the car.
5. I'm really not too worried about a thug attacking me. No one that I know has ever been attacked by a thug. Could it happen? Sure. Do I worry about it on a daily basis? No, I choose not to live in fear.
6. If a thug did attack me, I'm not sure how easy it would be for me to call 911 while they were attacking me so I probably wouldn't do that. Why would I pee my pants? I'd probably just fight back and hope for the best.

Just Braying It

Posts : 983
Join date : 2013-02-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  BladeRunner on Wed Jul 17, 2013 8:22 am

Liberal wrote:

1. No, I don't support the repeal of the Second Amendment. I've never actually heard anyone say that they did.
2. Yes, I do need a gun at my house in order to keep the stray cats at bay.
3. No, I don't need a gun on my person and never have.
4. No, I don't need a gun in my vehicle. I drive my kids and other people's kids to school everyday and wouldn't be able to live with myself if something happened because I had a gun in the car.
5. I'm really not too worried about a thug attacking me. No one that I know has ever been attacked by a thug. Could it happen? Sure. Do I worry about it on a daily basis? No, I choose not to live in fear.
6. If a thug did attack me, I'm not sure how easy it would be for me to call 911 while they were attacking me so I probably wouldn't do that. Why would I pee my pants? I'd probably just fight back and hope for the best.

So, where do you live that you are never concerned a thug attacking you?

Thugs don't exist where you live?
avatar
BladeRunner

Posts : 1917
Join date : 2012-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Darth Cheney on Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:19 am

BladeRunner wrote:
Liberal wrote:

1. No, I don't support the repeal of the Second Amendment. I've never actually heard anyone say that they did.
2. Yes, I do need a gun at my house in order to keep the stray cats at bay.
3. No, I don't need a gun on my person and never have.
4. No, I don't need a gun in my vehicle. I drive my kids and other people's kids to school everyday and wouldn't be able to live with myself if something happened because I had a gun in the car.
5. I'm really not too worried about a thug attacking me. No one that I know has ever been attacked by a thug. Could it happen? Sure. Do I worry about it on a daily basis? No, I choose not to live in fear.
6. If a thug did attack me, I'm not sure how easy it would be for me to call 911 while they were attacking me so I probably wouldn't do that. Why would I pee my pants? I'd probably just fight back and hope for the best.

So, where do you live that you are never concerned a thug attacking you?

Thugs don't exist where you live?
Must be in a republican controlled state.
avatar
Darth Cheney

Posts : 3373
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Jammer on Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:16 am

BladeRunner wrote:
Liberal wrote:

1. No, I don't support the repeal of the Second Amendment. I've never actually heard anyone say that they did.
2. Yes, I do need a gun at my house in order to keep the stray cats at bay.
3. No, I don't need a gun on my person and never have.
4. No, I don't need a gun in my vehicle. I drive my kids and other people's kids to school everyday and wouldn't be able to live with myself if something happened because I had a gun in the car.
5. I'm really not too worried about a thug attacking me. No one that I know has ever been attacked by a thug. Could it happen? Sure. Do I worry about it on a daily basis? No, I choose not to live in fear.
6. If a thug did attack me, I'm not sure how easy it would be for me to call 911 while they were attacking me so I probably wouldn't do that. Why would I pee my pants? I'd probably just fight back and hope for the best.

So, where do you live that you are never concerned a thug attacking you?

Thugs don't exist where you live?


You have to admire democrats for trying to protect their core constituency.   It is well known that right after unions, criminals are the democrats next largest block of constituents.   This George Zimmerman verdict has shocked the democrats as who would have ever thought street thugs would be put in harms way.

As a result, the democrats are going all out to make "self-defense" a crime.  They just can't stand the thought of losing any more voters to unpredictable victims that might actually fight back.
avatar
Jammer

Posts : 2413
Join date : 2013-05-22

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Darth Cheney on Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:21 am

Jammer wrote:
BladeRunner wrote:
Liberal wrote:

1. No, I don't support the repeal of the Second Amendment. I've never actually heard anyone say that they did.
2. Yes, I do need a gun at my house in order to keep the stray cats at bay.
3. No, I don't need a gun on my person and never have.
4. No, I don't need a gun in my vehicle. I drive my kids and other people's kids to school everyday and wouldn't be able to live with myself if something happened because I had a gun in the car.
5. I'm really not too worried about a thug attacking me. No one that I know has ever been attacked by a thug. Could it happen? Sure. Do I worry about it on a daily basis? No, I choose not to live in fear.
6. If a thug did attack me, I'm not sure how easy it would be for me to call 911 while they were attacking me so I probably wouldn't do that. Why would I pee my pants? I'd probably just fight back and hope for the best.

So, where do you live that you are never concerned a thug attacking you?

Thugs don't exist where you live?


You have to admire democrats for trying to protect their core constituency.   It is well known that right after unions, criminals are the democrats next largest block of constituents.   This George Zimmerman verdict has shocked the democrats as who would have ever thought street thugs would be put in harms way.

As a result, the democrats are going all out to make "self-defense" a crime.  They just can't stand the thought of losing any more voters to unpredictable victims that might actually fight back.

 Don't worry, Treyvon will continue to vote for many, many, years.Twisted Evil
avatar
Darth Cheney

Posts : 3373
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  BladeRunner on Wed Jul 17, 2013 11:44 am

Darth Cheney wrote:
Jammer wrote:
BladeRunner wrote:
Liberal wrote:

1. No, I don't support the repeal of the Second Amendment. I've never actually heard anyone say that they did.
2. Yes, I do need a gun at my house in order to keep the stray cats at bay.
3. No, I don't need a gun on my person and never have.
4. No, I don't need a gun in my vehicle. I drive my kids and other people's kids to school everyday and wouldn't be able to live with myself if something happened because I had a gun in the car.
5. I'm really not too worried about a thug attacking me. No one that I know has ever been attacked by a thug. Could it happen? Sure. Do I worry about it on a daily basis? No, I choose not to live in fear.
6. If a thug did attack me, I'm not sure how easy it would be for me to call 911 while they were attacking me so I probably wouldn't do that. Why would I pee my pants? I'd probably just fight back and hope for the best.

So, where do you live that you are never concerned a thug attacking you?

Thugs don't exist where you live?


You have to admire democrats for trying to protect their core constituency.   It is well known that right after unions, criminals are the democrats next largest block of constituents.   This George Zimmerman verdict has shocked the democrats as who would have ever thought street thugs would be put in harms way.

As a result, the democrats are going all out to make "self-defense" a crime.  They just can't stand the thought of losing any more voters to unpredictable victims that might actually fight back.

 Don't worry, Treyvon will continue to vote for many, many, years.Twisted Evil

Of course because

avatar
BladeRunner

Posts : 1917
Join date : 2012-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Freedom Forever on Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:57 pm

I gotta say it is fun watching the loony left implode on this verdict. Now they want the fed to charge Zimmerman. What maroons.  
avatar
Freedom Forever

Posts : 1123
Join date : 2013-01-14
Location : Yur Mom's House

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Just Braying It on Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:04 pm

BladeRunner wrote:
Liberal wrote:

1. No, I don't support the repeal of the Second Amendment. I've never actually heard anyone say that they did.
2. Yes, I do need a gun at my house in order to keep the stray cats at bay.
3. No, I don't need a gun on my person and never have.
4. No, I don't need a gun in my vehicle. I drive my kids and other people's kids to school everyday and wouldn't be able to live with myself if something happened because I had a gun in the car.
5. I'm really not too worried about a thug attacking me. No one that I know has ever been attacked by a thug. Could it happen? Sure. Do I worry about it on a daily basis? No, I choose not to live in fear.
6. If a thug did attack me, I'm not sure how easy it would be for me to call 911 while they were attacking me so I probably wouldn't do that. Why would I pee my pants? I'd probably just fight back and hope for the best.

So, where do you live that you are never concerned a thug attacking you?

Thugs don't exist where you live?

I never said thugs don't exist where I live. Read what is written. I even said it is possible that I could be attacked by a thug. I also said I have never heard of anyone I know being attacked by a thug. Why should I spend everyday fearing something that probably won't happen? I could get trample by a cow tonight too, but I'm not going to let that dictate my life.

If you guys want to spend every moment of your lives in fear that some thug may attack you, have at it. Me, I'll be enjoying my time on this earth.

Just Braying It

Posts : 983
Join date : 2013-02-17

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Darth Cheney on Wed Jul 17, 2013 6:29 pm

Liberal wrote:
BladeRunner wrote:
Liberal wrote:

1. No, I don't support the repeal of the Second Amendment. I've never actually heard anyone say that they did.
2. Yes, I do need a gun at my house in order to keep the stray cats at bay.
3. No, I don't need a gun on my person and never have.
4. No, I don't need a gun in my vehicle. I drive my kids and other people's kids to school everyday and wouldn't be able to live with myself if something happened because I had a gun in the car.
5. I'm really not too worried about a thug attacking me. No one that I know has ever been attacked by a thug. Could it happen? Sure. Do I worry about it on a daily basis? No, I choose not to live in fear.
6. If a thug did attack me, I'm not sure how easy it would be for me to call 911 while they were attacking me so I probably wouldn't do that. Why would I pee my pants? I'd probably just fight back and hope for the best.

So, where do you live that you are never concerned a thug attacking you?

Thugs don't exist where you live?

I never said thugs don't exist where I live. Read what is written. I even said it is possible that I could be attacked by a thug. I also said I have never heard of anyone I know being attacked by a thug. Why should I spend everyday fearing something that probably won't happen? I could get trample by a cow tonight too, but I'm not going to let that dictate my life.

If you guys want to spend every moment of your lives in fear that some thug may attack you, have at it. Me, I'll be enjoying my time on this earth.
Not fear...anticipation.
avatar
Darth Cheney

Posts : 3373
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  BladeRunner on Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:50 am

Liberal wrote:
I never said thugs don't exist where I live. Read what is written. I even said it is possible that I could be attacked by a thug. I also said I have never heard of anyone I know being attacked by a thug. Why should I spend everyday fearing something that probably won't happen? I could get trample by a cow tonight too, but I'm not going to let that dictate my life.

If you guys want to spend every moment of your lives in fear that some thug may attack you, have at it. Me, I'll be enjoying my time on this earth.

Do you take precautions for anything else that might happen in your life?

Don't wear seat belts because you don't want to live in fear of being hit by another driver.
Don't avoid being around smokers because you don't want to live in fear of breathing in second hand smoke.
Eat all of the fatty foods you want because you don't want to live in fear of heart disease.
Walk right up to that raging bull because you don't want to live in fear of being trampled by it.

etc.....
avatar
BladeRunner

Posts : 1917
Join date : 2012-12-21

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: The Zimmerman Trial

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum