He had concerns about "order and discipline"

Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl told the military he left his unit in eastern Afghanistan in July 2009 intending to walk to the nearest U.S. military outpost to report wrongdoing, believing he could not trust his own commanders to deal with his concerns, according to sources familiar with the Army investigation.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/27/politics/bergdahl-intended-to-walk-to-nearest-base/index.html

Makes about as much sense as a main gate security sentry at Offutt AFB, NE leaving his assigned duty post and hiking to the Armed Forces recruiting station in Council Bluffs, IA!

Considering Bergdahl has been charged with Article 85, Desertion and Article 99, Misbehavior in face of the enemy, sort of indicates the reviewers of documentation of the investigation don't believe this scenario.

Skeptical wrote:

Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl told the military he left his unit in eastern Afghanistan in July 2009 intending to walk to the nearest U.S. military outpost to report wrongdoing, believing he could not trust his own commanders to deal with his concerns, according to sources familiar with the Army investigation.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/27/politics/bergdahl-intended-to-walk-to-nearest-base/index.html

Makes about as much sense as a main gate security sentry at Offutt AFB, NE leaving his assigned duty post and hiking to the Armed Forces recruiting station in Council Bluffs, IA!

Considering Bergdahl has been charged with Article 85, Desertion and Article 99, Misbehavior in face of the enemy, sort of indicates the reviewers of documentation of the investigation don't believe this scenario.

I'm far more interested in the battle for Tikrit than this but that is just me.

Caitlyn Piltover wrote:I'm far more interested in the battle for Tikrit than this but that is just me.

Then start a fcuking thread on it. This thread is about a lying bastard of a deserter. About cowardly actions of a shell of human debris that caused the death of 6 of his fellow soldiers. And yet Jugears appears to still stand behind his original characterization of Bergdahl as a hero who “served the United States with honor and distinction.” White House flack Josh Earnest states that he doesn't "want to be in a position of commenting on an ongoing military justice investigation,” even though that didn't stop the White House from heaping laurels on Bergdahl the day he was released.

Caitlyn Piltover wrote:I'm far more interested in the battle for Tikrit than this but that is just me.

Just for the record, who do you want to win in this battle?

Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Then start a fcuking thread on it. This thread is about a lying bastard of a deserter. About cowardly actions of a shell of human debris that caused the death of 6 of his fellow soldiers. And yet Jugears appears to still stand behind his original characterization of Bergdahl as a hero who “served the United States with honor and distinction.” White House flack Josh Earnest states that he doesn't "want to be in a position of commenting on an ongoing military justice investigation,” even though that didn't stop the White House from heaping laurels on Bergdahl the day he was released.

LOL that is pretty funny you are labeling someone a coward when you do not know them.

Skeptical wrote:
Just for the record, who do you want to win in this battle?

Oh you mean in this case?

I don't know enough about it to really comment.

Caitlyn Piltover wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Then start a fcuking thread on it. This thread is about a lying bastard of a deserter. About cowardly actions of a shell of human debris that caused the death of 6 of his fellow soldiers. And yet Jugears appears to still stand behind his original characterization of Bergdahl as a hero who “served the United States with honor and distinction.” White House flack Josh Earnest states that he doesn't "want to be in a position of commenting on an ongoing military justice investigation,” even though that didn't stop the White House from heaping laurels on Bergdahl the day he was released.

LOL that is pretty funny you are labeling someone a coward when you do not know them.

I judge him by his actions. Even if his claim that he couldn't trust his commanders was true (and I don't believe that BS), he could've contacted others higher up in the chain of command to lodge his complaints. Instead he went on a walk about in enemy territory and subjected his fellow soldiers to danger that resulted in six deaths in their search for him. Yes, he is a coward and I don't need to sit down and drink a beer with this loser to discern that.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Caitlyn Piltover wrote:I'm far more interested in the battle for Tikrit than this but that is just me.

Then start a fcuking thread on it. This thread is about a lying bastard of a deserter. About cowardly actions of a shell of human debris that caused the death of 6 of his fellow soldiers. And yet Jugears appears to still stand behind his original characterization of Bergdahl as a hero who “served the United States with honor and distinction.” White House flack Josh Earnest states that he doesn't "want to be in a position of commenting on an ongoing military justice investigation,” even though that didn't stop the White House from heaping laurels on Bergdahl the day he was released.

The lying POS in Chief couldn't be more proud of that deserting muslim convert.