Ever wonder why mainstream media goes easy on Obama?

Skeptical wrote:

Think there is any connection between the following marriages and why Obama is treated so well by the media.


ABC News executive producer Ian Cameron is married to Susan Rice, National Security Adviser.

CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes, Obama’s Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications.

ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman is married to former White House Press Secretary Jay Carney.

ABC News and Univision reporter Matthew Jaffe is married to Katie Hogan, Obama’s Deputy Press Secretary.

ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of Obama’s Special Adviser Elizabeth Sherwood.

CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to former Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.

nightlight88 wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Think there is any connection between the following marriages and why Obama is treated so well by the media.


ABC News executive producer Ian Cameron is married to Susan Rice, National Security Adviser.

CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes, Obama’s Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications.

ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman is married to former White House Press Secretary Jay Carney.

ABC News and Univision reporter Matthew Jaffe is married to Katie Hogan, Obama’s Deputy Press Secretary.

ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of Obama’s Special Adviser Elizabeth Sherwood.

CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to former Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.

OMG


NEPOTISM at its worst.

Jammer wrote: I am not so sure it is nepotism as much as it is the strategic saturation of an industry.  Think about where the vast majority of these progressive liberal slime bags have concentrated over the years:

Newspapers
TV
Radio
Hollywood
Theater
Education

Outside of education, the others generally fit into a category of media/entertainment.  When you add in education, look for a new thread of commonality that runs thru them all"

Messaging

The progressive liberals have strategically taken over the narrative or messaging of this country.  Whether it is an in your face Al Sharpton on MSNBC of some progressive liberals teaching your children in school or influencing them in children's theater, they are controlling the messaging.  Think about it when our youth are influenced by these people who gently portray conservatives as the bad guys, what do the youth think as they grow up.

Now with technology changing the field, who is controlling the social media sites, the search engines and other messaging related sites like Yahoo on the Internet?  YEP, they are for the most part progressive liberals.

So, when these people are married to each other, it should come as no big surprise.  They are just inbreeding their evil ideology.  What would you expect, these progressive liberal elitists to run out an marry an engineer, a doctor, an entrepreneur or somebody else producing all of the goods and services that drive our economy?  NOPE - those people are there to be taxed to death and if that doesn't get them, they will always fall back on their much loved wealth redistribution.

But not what might surprise some is the next industry or segment they have targeted - financial.  Do some studying and you will see that almost every foundation in this country is run by progressive liberals.  Conservatives work all their lives, become very successful  and then create a foundation to give back some of the blessings God gave them.  What better place for free loading progressive liberals to take over.  Somebody else's money and they can spend it on themselves while throwing a few nickels and dimes at the poor and the sick while telling everyone what good people they are.

And it is spreading.  I would be willing to bet that over half of the big money hedge funds are now run by progressive liberals who all benefit from the tax scam known as "carried interest".  A tax scam kept in place by the liberals to benefit their friends an big donors.

But hey no problem, the progressive liberals control the narrative so they trot out their scapegoat in this area Mitt Romney and paint him as the poster child for the 1% living off the hard work of the 99% never mind that for every Romney there are several progressive liberals who benefit from this tax scam.  

This strategy works well for the progressive liberals as the low information voters believe the narrative coming from the progressive liberals and vote to keep them in power.  A very long story that could have been stated by merely saying that I think it is more "strategic positioning" rather than nepotism.

Skeptical wrote:

Jammer wrote: I am not so sure it is nepotism as much as it is the strategic saturation of an industry.  Think about where the vast majority of these progressive liberal slime bags have concentrated over the years:

Newspapers
TV
Radio
Hollywood
Theater
Education

Outside of education, the others generally fit into a category of media/entertainment.  When you add in education, look for a new thread of commonality that runs thru them all"

Messaging

The progressive liberals have strategically taken over the narrative or messaging of this country.  Whether it is an in your face Al Sharpton on MSNBC of some progressive liberals teaching your children in school or influencing them in children's theater, they are controlling the messaging.  Think about it when our youth are influenced by these people who gently portray conservatives as the bad guys, what do the youth think as they grow up.

Now with technology changing the field, who is controlling the social media sites, the search engines and other messaging related sites like Yahoo on the Internet?  YEP, they are for the most part progressive liberals.

So, when these people are married to each other, it should come as no big surprise.  They are just inbreeding their evil ideology.  What would you expect, these progressive liberal elitists to run out an marry an engineer, a doctor, an entrepreneur or somebody else producing all of the goods and services that drive our economy?  NOPE - those people are there to be taxed to death and if that doesn't get them, they will always fall back on their much loved wealth redistribution.

But not what might surprise some is the next industry or segment they have targeted - financial.  Do some studying and you will see that almost every foundation in this country is run by progressive liberals.  Conservatives work all their lives, become very successful  and then create a foundation to give back some of the blessings God gave them.  What better place for free loading progressive liberals to take over.  Somebody else's money and they can spend it on themselves while throwing a few nickels and dimes at the poor and the sick while telling everyone what good people they are.

And it is spreading.  I would be willing to bet that over half of the big money hedge funds are now run by progressive liberals who all benefit from the tax scam known as "carried interest".  A tax scam kept in place by the liberals to benefit their friends an big donors.

But hey no problem, the progressive liberals control the narrative so they trot out their scapegoat in this area Mitt Romney and paint him as the poster child for the 1% living off the hard work of the 99% never mind that for every Romney there are several progressive liberals who benefit from this tax scam.  

This strategy works well for the progressive liberals as the low information voters believe the narrative coming from the progressive liberals and vote to keep them in power.  A very long story that could have been stated by merely saying that I think it is more "strategic positioning" rather than nepotism.

Contains all or most of the  ingredients to be called institutional indoctrination !