O'Reilly vs Lauer

Clicker wrote:NBC really screwed the pooch letting Lauer do this interview. Bill easily controlled the flow of conversation and shut Lauer down at least twice. You gotta remember that this is the edited most prejudicial form they could make it.  NBC was so anxious to get the interview that they even agreed to hawk Bills new book!!!!  

https://www.aol.com/article/entertainment/2017/09/19/bill-oreilly-to-matt-lauer-i-never-mistreated-anyone-at-fox-news/23214808/

Dr. Evil wrote:

Clicker wrote:NBC really screwed the pooch letting Lauer do this interview. Bill easily controlled the flow of conversation and shut Lauer down at least twice. You gotta remember that this is the edited most prejudicial form they could make it.  NBC was so anxious to get the interview that they even agreed to hawk Bills new book!!!!  

https://www.aol.com/article/entertainment/2017/09/19/bill-oreilly-to-matt-lauer-i-never-mistreated-anyone-at-fox-news/23214808/

O'Reilly is a professional.  No doubt about it. If you think you're going to weasel the truth out of him, you better be prepared. Or he'll walk all over you...

Dr. Evil wrote: he'll walk all over you...

Clicker wrote:

Dr. Evil wrote: he'll walk all over you...

And that's exactly what he did.  

Yes, that's why I said it.

He even cut Lauer's screed off and corrected him a couple of times.  Attempted traps by Lauer wound up with him hiding under his desk, figuratively  of course, there was no desk for him th hide under.

I've seen plenty of people put O'Reilly in his place. Lauer was either not prepared or not capable. However, you seem to be implying that this was some sort of contest or hit job. It was certainly not. This was just an honest reporter trying to do his job. The guy he was interviewing just happened to be a lying POS. And very good at it.

Dr. Evil wrote:

Clicker wrote:

Dr. Evil wrote: he'll walk all over you...

And that's exactly what he did.  

Yes, that's why I said it.

He even cut Lauer's screed off and corrected him a couple of times.  Attempted traps by Lauer wound up with him hiding under his desk, figuratively  of course, there was no desk for him th hide under.

I've seen plenty of people put O'Reilly in his place. Lauer was either not prepared or not capable. However, you seem to be implying that this was some sort of contest or hit job. It was certainly not. This was just an honest reporter trying to do his job. The guy he was interviewing just happened to be a lying POS. And very good at it.

Clicker wrote:

Dr. Evil wrote:

Clicker wrote:

Dr. Evil wrote: he'll walk all over you...

And that's exactly what he did.  

Yes, that's why I said it.

He even cut Lauer's screed off and corrected him a couple of times.  Attempted traps by Lauer wound up with him hiding under his desk, figuratively  of course, there was no desk for him th hide under.

I've seen plenty of people put O'Reilly in his place. Lauer was either not prepared or not capable. However, you seem to be implying that this was some sort of contest or hit job. It was certainly not. This was just an honest reporter trying to do his job. The guy he was interviewing just happened to be a lying POS. And very good at it.

First, you didn't say he did, you said he will, generic to anyone.  Second what you've seen is talkathon libs shouting over him and trying to appear righteous.  As I've watched for years no lib has ever "put him in his place" or anyone elses for that matter.

Dr. Evil wrote:

Clicker wrote:

Dr. Evil wrote:

Clicker wrote:

Dr. Evil wrote: he'll walk all over you...

And that's exactly what he did.  

Yes, that's why I said it.

He even cut Lauer's screed off and corrected him a couple of times.  Attempted traps by Lauer wound up with him hiding under his desk, figuratively  of course, there was no desk for him th hide under.

I've seen plenty of people put O'Reilly in his place. Lauer was either not prepared or not capable. However, you seem to be implying that this was some sort of contest or hit job. It was certainly not. This was just an honest reporter trying to do his job. The guy he was interviewing just happened to be a lying POS. And very good at it.

First, you didn't say he did, you said he will, generic to anyone.  Second what you've seen is talkathon libs shouting over him and trying to appear righteous.  As I've watched for years no lib has ever "put him in his place" or anyone elses for that matter.

O'Really?? How about this gem???

Clicker wrote:

Dr. Evil wrote:

Clicker wrote:

Dr. Evil wrote:

Clicker wrote:

Dr. Evil wrote: he'll walk all over you...

And that's exactly what he did.  

Yes, that's why I said it.

He even cut Lauer's screed off and corrected him a couple of times.  Attempted traps by Lauer wound up with him hiding under his desk, figuratively  of course, there was no desk for him th hide under.

I've seen plenty of people put O'Reilly in his place. Lauer was either not prepared or not capable. However, you seem to be implying that this was some sort of contest or hit job. It was certainly not. This was just an honest reporter trying to do his job. The guy he was interviewing just happened to be a lying POS. And very good at it.

First, you didn't say he did, you said he will, generic to anyone.  Second what you've seen is talkathon libs shouting over him and trying to appear righteous.  As I've watched for years no lib has ever "put him in his place" or anyone elses for that matter.

O'Really?? How about this gem???

That one is an old worn out gotcha attempt.  If you don't know what they are really talking about you will see the kid getting under Bills skin but the obvious context issue and a couple of other gilding the lily attempts are what bring rise to his ire.  That's why it's called the "no spin zone".