West Fargo elementary school offers unisex bathrooms

InForum.com wrote:When West Fargo's Deer Creek Elementary School opened its doors for the first time Tuesday, Aug. 27, it became the first public school in the Fargo-Moorhead area without boys and girls bathrooms, instead offering all unisex bathrooms.

Jammer wrote:That was the most idiotic comment by a clueless twit who is only concerned about their personal perverted sexual desires.  

https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2015/March/Gender-Neutral-Bathrooms-a-Logistical-Nightmare

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/unisex-toilets-in-schools-should-be-avoided-at-all-costs-9206081.html

https://www.washwareessentials.co.uk/content/unisex-bathroom

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Jammer wrote:That was the most idiotic comment by a clueless twit who is only concerned about their personal perverted sexual desires.  

https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2015/March/Gender-Neutral-Bathrooms-a-Logistical-Nightmare

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/unisex-toilets-in-schools-should-be-avoided-at-all-costs-9206081.html

https://www.washwareessentials.co.uk/content/unisex-bathroom

You didn't bother to read the article about the school in West Fargo did you?

InForum.com wrote:... the social issues were not a part of the bathroom design at Deer Creek.

InForum.com wrote:The school was designed with unisex student bathrooms after an architectural study found that such bathrooms, which have communal washing stations and private doors on each stall, are more space efficient, practical and safer than gender-divided bathrooms.

InForum.com wrote:"Before, if a student needed to be checked on in the girls' bathroom, only a female staff person can go into the girls bathroom and the same for the boys," Leas said. "Now, any teacher can go in to the bathrooms and monitor them. For me, that added safety perspective is a big benefit."

Shortie's Ex wrote:    "... personal perverted sexual desires." ??!!??    

Your fear of the qu'eer boogey person really has you manufacturing issues in your own mind.

You have embarrassed yourself with your self-indulgent assumptions once again.

Stated outright in the article which you were too lazy to read -  

InForum.com wrote:... the social issues were not a part of the bathroom design at Deer Creek.

Simple facts of architecture, operation and supervision -

InForum.com wrote:The school was designed with unisex student bathrooms after an architectural study found that such bathrooms, which have communal washing stations and private doors on each stall, are more space efficient, practical and safer than gender-divided bathrooms.

And this -

InForum.com wrote:"Before, if a student needed to be checked on in the girls' bathroom, only a female staff person can go into the girls bathroom and the same for the boys," Leas said. "Now, any teacher can go in to the bathrooms and monitor them. For me, that added safety perspective is a big benefit."

Tangible benefits to the students and teachers in the school, as well as the taxpayers of the district.

Skeptical wrote:

Well, you all can rest easy, there is no "born that way" GAY GENE!

What will the queers say now to justify THEIR CHOICE of lifestyle?

Darth Cheney wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Well, you all can rest easy, there is no "born that way" GAY GENE!

What will the queers say now to justify THEIR CHOICE of lifestyle?

It was always a mental illness and will return to being a mental illness.

Skeptical wrote:

Well, you all can rest easy, there is no "born that way" GAY GENE!

What will the queers say now to justify THEIR CHOICE of lifestyle?

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Well, you all can rest easy, there is no "born that way" GAY GENE!

What will the queers say now to justify THEIR CHOICE of lifestyle?

WTF does THIS have to do with design, construction and operation of bathrooms in a school???

Skeptical wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Well, you all can rest easy, there is no "born that way" GAY GENE!

What will the queers say now to justify THEIR CHOICE of lifestyle?

WTF does THIS have to do with design, construction and operation of bathrooms in a school???

Quite simple!
Stalls with doors in a "UNISEX" bathroom also furthers the agenda of the transgender (confused gender) crowd.
In short, a person is born either a male or a female, any deviation from this is at the wishes of that confused person.  The person with the mental illness!

Skeptical wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Well, you all can rest easy, there is no "born that way" GAY GENE!

What will the queers say now to justify THEIR CHOICE of lifestyle?

WTF does THIS have to do with design, construction and operation of bathrooms in a school???

Quite simple!
Stalls with doors in a "UNISEX" bathroom also furthers the agenda of the transgender (confused gender) crowd.
In short, a person is born either a male or a female, any deviation from this is at the wishes of that confused person.  The person with the mental illness!

Skeptical wrote:

"So to be clear you prefer bathroom stalls without doors in single sex bathrooms then.
Why do you prefer bathroom stalls without doors?  
Do you like to watch the other boys while they are using the bathroom?  "      

Another typical accusation from a member the room temp IQ liberal crowd
I suppose you are prepared to copy and paste those comments by me that says what you falsely claim.
NO, I thought not!
To borrow the favorite response from a member of the long gone Argus Leader forum would say to you, "You are a fukking lying scumbag"!

Shortie's Ex wrote:In all of your clever wit and deflection, Mr Jammer, you forgot to answer my question.

I'll write it slow so you can read it slow.

Did. You. Read. The. Links. Which. You. Provided?

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

"So to be clear you prefer bathroom stalls without doors in single sex bathrooms then.
Why do you prefer bathroom stalls without doors?  
Do you like to watch the other boys while they are using the bathroom?  "      

Another typical accusation from a member the room temp IQ liberal crowd
I suppose you are prepared to copy and paste those comments by me that says what you falsely claim.
NO, I thought not!
To borrow the favorite response from a member of the long gone Argus Leader forum would say to you, "You are a fukking lying scumbag"!

All these words (and even an attempted insult, or two).  Yet no where did you you deny that you prefer bathroom stalls without doors because you like to watch the other boys while they are using the bathroom.
I'll assume that your answer is 'yes'.

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:In all of your clever wit and deflection, Mr Jammer, you forgot to answer my question.

I'll write it slow so you can read it slow.

Did. You. Read. The. Links. Which. You. Provided?

Mr Jammer?

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:In all of your clever wit and deflection, Mr Jammer, you forgot to answer my question.

I'll write it slow so you can read it slow.

Did. You. Read. The. Links. Which. You. Provided?

Mr Jammer?

Hey Twit, I am more than happy to tweak your tit, but that is where I draw the line.  There is no way that I am going to play footsie with you.

Shortie's Ex wrote:In all of your clever wit and deflection, Mr Jammer, you forgot to answer my question.

I'll write it slow so you can read it slow.

Did. You. Read. The. Links. Which. You. Provided?

Rachel Roberts in independent.co.uk wrote:In schools, however, I think they could be a recipe for disaster – a teenage pregnancy here, a sexual assault there, lots of discomfort and embarrassment for both sexes, a urine-soaked mess of raging hormones, sexual bullying and teenage tears.

Rachel Roberts in independent.co.uk wrote:I’m sure I would have been very unhappy at having to share toilets with the boys when I was at school.

Rachel Roberts in independent.co.uk wrote:children in secondary schools are often extremely self-conscious

Rachel Roberts in independent.co.uk wrote:teenage boys have their own insecurities. Imagine a lone, shy boy

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:In all of your clever wit and deflection, Mr Jammer, you forgot to answer my question.

I'll write it slow so you can read it slow.

Did. You. Read. The. Links. Which. You. Provided?

Mr Jammer?

Hey Twit, I am more than happy to tweak your tit, but that is where I draw the line.  There is no way that I am going to play footsie with you.

Tweak my tit ???
Imagine that - an old white guy riding his high horse of moral resolution and puritanism threatening to sexually assault a fellow poster.
My, what a resolute piece of ethical and moral garbage you are.

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Jammer wrote:
Hey Twit, I am more than happy to tweak your tit, but that is where I draw the line.  There is no way that I am going to play footsie with you.

Tweak my tit ???
Imagine that - an old white guy riding his high horse of moral resolution and puritanism threatening to sexually assault a fellow poster.
My, what a resolute piece of ethical and moral garbage you are.

Jammer wrote:I will take that as a compliment.