Obama negotiating with terrorists

BladeRunner wrote:It's interesting the libs over at GPLV have nothing to say about it......

What are your thoughts?


http://greatplainsvoices.com/index.php?topic=11114.0

BladeRunner wrote:Look what happened when Bush let a terrorist go....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/marc-thiessen-heres-what-happens-when-taliban-leaders-are-released/2014/06/02/60eab8aa-ea59-11e3-b98c-72cef4a00499_story.html

nightlight88 wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:Look what happened when Bush let a terrorist go....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/marc-thiessen-heres-what-happens-when-taliban-leaders-are-released/2014/06/02/60eab8aa-ea59-11e3-b98c-72cef4a00499_story.html

I can compare the loser-in-chief letting these MFers go with a judge letting a serial pedophile go and the guy rapes and kills more kids.

LittleJusty at GPLV wrote:Obama blew it with this unprecedented move, he should have sold them 1500 missiles in exchange for Bergdahl. I think that's what McCain had in mind when he said he would support a prisoner exchange if the details were right.

BladeRunner wrote:LittleJusty finally admitted Obama blew it....of course he slammed McCain in the same post....

LittleJusty at GPLV wrote:Obama blew it with this unprecedented move, he should have sold them 1500 missiles in exchange for Bergdahl. I think that's what McCain had in mind when he said he would support a prisoner exchange if the details were right.

During the course of our secret discussions, I authorized the transfer of small amounts of defensive weapons and spare parts for defensive systems to Iran. My purpose was to convince Tehran that our negotiators were acting with my authority, to send a signal that the United States was prepared to replace the animosity between us with a new relationship. These modest deliveries, taken together, could easily fit into a single cargo plane. They could not, taken together, affect the outcome of the 6-year war between Iran and Iraq nor could they affect in any way the military balance between the two countries. Those with whom we were in contact took considerable risks and needed a signal of our serious intent if they were to carry on and broaden the dialog. At the same time we undertook this initiative, we made clear that Iran must oppose all forms of international terrorism as a condition of progress in our relationship. The most significant step which Iran could take, we indicated, would be to use its influence in Lebanon to secure the release of all hostages held there.

BladeRunner wrote:LittleJusty finally admitted Obama blew it....of course he slammed McCain in the same post....

LittleJusty at GPLV wrote:Obama blew it with this unprecedented move, he should have sold them 1500 missiles in exchange for Bergdahl. I think that's what McCain had in mind when he said he would support a prisoner exchange if the details were right.

Twinkies wrote:Im sure glad Obama was able to negotiate the release of an American Hero. Thank you Mr. President!

Twinkies wrote:Im sure glad Obama was able to negotiate the release of an American Hero. Thank you Mr. President!

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Twinkies wrote:Im sure glad Obama was able to negotiate the release of an American Hero. Thank you Mr. President!

Embracing Susan Rice's "official lies story" I see. Even the best that can be said about Bergdahl is he abandoned his post, a court martial offense punishable by death. Hardly the actions of a hero, except in your's and Obama's bizarro world. Maybe we should have a beer summit between Bergdahl  and his fellow soldiers to clear the air.

Twinkies wrote:Im sure glad Obama was able to negotiate the release of an American Hero. Thank you Mr. President!

Skeptical wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:LittleJusty finally admitted Obama blew it....of course he slammed McCain in the same post....

LittleJusty at GPLV wrote:Obama blew it with this unprecedented move, he should have sold them 1500 missiles in exchange for Bergdahl. I think that's what McCain had in mind when he said he would support a prisoner exchange if the details were right.

Jusin/Shortie's Lover/Liberal's post is another example of his/her/it warped sarcasm.

A senior intelligence official with intimate knowledge of the years-long effort to locate and rescue Bergdahl told the Washington Free Beacon that the details of that exchange do not add up.

The official, who requested anonymity because he is not authorized to speak to the press, speculated that a cash ransom was paid to the Haqqani Network to get the group to free the prisoner.

“The Haqqanis could give a rat’s ass about prisoners,” the official said, referring to the Haqqani Network, a designated terrorist group in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the five Guantanamo Bay prisoners who were freed in exchange for Bergdahl’s release.

“The people that are holding Bergdahl want[ed] cash and someone paid it to them,” he said.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Now it is looking like that ransom was paid for Bergedahl's release.

A senior intelligence official with intimate knowledge of the years-long effort to locate and rescue Bergdahl told the Washington Free Beacon that the details of that exchange do not add up.

The official, who requested anonymity because he is not authorized to speak to the press, speculated that a cash ransom was paid to the Haqqani Network to get the group to free the prisoner.

And

“The Haqqanis could give a rat’s ass about prisoners,” the official said, referring to the Haqqani Network, a designated terrorist group in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and the five Guantanamo Bay prisoners who were freed in exchange for Bergdahl’s release.

“The people that are holding Bergdahl want[ed] cash and someone paid it to them,” he said.

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/experts-say-cash-ransom-may-have-been-paid-for-bergdahl/