I Thought we Ended the Space Program....

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Caitlyn Piltover wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:
Obama's poll numbers are way down. The stock market has always mirrored his poll numbers (inversely proportional to).

They are way down?

Since when is 45% way down? I'd also like some proof of those "way down" numbers because the facts don't support your assertion.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/barack-obama-presidential-job-approval.aspx

Sure its not 70% like it used to be when he first became elected, but 45% is still better than most.

Congress approval rating is still abysmal, at 15%~.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/180113/2014-approval-congress-remains-near-time-low.aspx

According to your link Obama's job disapproval rating is 50%.

!) When the President (or for that matter any incumbent's) approval rating drops below 50% it is not considered a good thing.

2) When a President's (or for that matter any incumbent's) disapproval numbers are larger than his approval numbers it is not considered a good thing.

Time to hit the reset button Nicci.

Good or not, Obama's numbers are actually quite standard at his place in his presidency.  Sorry if that doesn't support your thesis.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/presidential-approval-ratings-gallup-historical-statistics-trends.aspx

That's correct. Note fumb duck, typical or not, I stated that any incumbent (which includes Dems, Rep, Commies, Fascists, etc) that polls under 50% is not considered a good thing especially when his/her disapproval rating is larger than his/her approval. Sighhhhhhhhh.

Agreed, we should always ask for more of our elected officials.  The status quo just isn't enough.

That isn't what I said but thanks for that spin. Frankly I don't want any more of the Great and Wondrous "O". If he finished off his term playing golf in Hawaii, I'd be ok with that.

Sorry I missed your mark, let me take another stab at it:

We should be asking for more from Obama than what we've gotten from past Presidents.  The status quo just isn't enough.

I agree with that as well.

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Caitlyn Piltover wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:
Obama's poll numbers are way down. The stock market has always mirrored his poll numbers (inversely proportional to).

They are way down?

Since when is 45% way down? I'd also like some proof of those "way down" numbers because the facts don't support your assertion.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/barack-obama-presidential-job-approval.aspx

Sure its not 70% like it used to be when he first became elected, but 45% is still better than most.

Congress approval rating is still abysmal, at 15%~.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/180113/2014-approval-congress-remains-near-time-low.aspx

According to your link Obama's job disapproval rating is 50%.

!) When the President (or for that matter any incumbent's) approval rating drops below 50% it is not considered a good thing.

2) When a President's (or for that matter any incumbent's) disapproval numbers are larger than his approval numbers it is not considered a good thing.

Time to hit the reset button Nicci.

Good or not, Obama's numbers are actually quite standard at his place in his presidency.  Sorry if that doesn't support your thesis.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/presidential-approval-ratings-gallup-historical-statistics-trends.aspx

That's correct. Note fumb duck, typical or not, I stated that any incumbent (which includes Dems, Rep, Commies, Fascists, etc) that polls under 50% is not considered a good thing especially when his/her disapproval rating is larger than his/her approval. Sighhhhhhhhh.

Agreed, we should always ask for more of our elected officials.  The status quo just isn't enough.

That isn't what I said but thanks for that spin. Frankly I don't want any more of the Great and Wondrous "O". If he finished off his term playing golf in Hawaii, I'd be ok with that.

Sorry I missed your mark, let me take another stab at it:

We should be asking for more from Obama than what we've gotten from past Presidents.  The status quo just isn't enough.

I agree with that as well.

O BA MA
O BA MA
O BA MA
O BA MA
O BA MA
O BA MA


BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA

MMMM MMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMM

Dr. Jones wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:

O BA MA
O BA MA
O BA MA
O BA MA
O BA MA
O BA MA


BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA

MMMM MMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMM

Ummm, ok?

nightlight88 wrote:
If its on the internet, it MUST be true.

Dr. Jones wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Caitlyn Piltover wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:
Obama's poll numbers are way down. The stock market has always mirrored his poll numbers (inversely proportional to).

They are way down?

Since when is 45% way down? I'd also like some proof of those "way down" numbers because the facts don't support your assertion.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/barack-obama-presidential-job-approval.aspx

Sure its not 70% like it used to be when he first became elected, but 45% is still better than most.

Congress approval rating is still abysmal, at 15%~.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/180113/2014-approval-congress-remains-near-time-low.aspx

According to your link Obama's job disapproval rating is 50%.

!) When the President (or for that matter any incumbent's) approval rating drops below 50% it is not considered a good thing.

2) When a President's (or for that matter any incumbent's) disapproval numbers are larger than his approval numbers it is not considered a good thing.

Time to hit the reset button Nicci.

Good or not, Obama's numbers are actually quite standard at his place in his presidency.  Sorry if that doesn't support your thesis.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/presidential-approval-ratings-gallup-historical-statistics-trends.aspx

That's correct. Note fumb duck, typical or not, I stated that any incumbent (which includes Dems, Rep, Commies, Fascists, etc) that polls under 50% is not considered a good thing especially when his/her disapproval rating is larger than his/her approval. Sighhhhhhhhh.

Agreed, we should always ask for more of our elected officials.  The status quo just isn't enough.

That isn't what I said but thanks for that spin. Frankly I don't want any more of the Great and Wondrous "O". If he finished off his term playing golf in Hawaii, I'd be ok with that.

Sorry I missed your mark, let me take another stab at it:

We should be asking for more from Obama than what we've gotten from past Presidents.  The status quo just isn't enough.

I agree with that as well.

O BA MA
O BA MA
O BA MA
O BA MA
O BA MA
O BA MA


BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA

MMMM MMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMM

Ummm, ok?

Dr. Jones wrote:Yes, obviously a very stupid move by a very stupid person.  Do you really want to get into a conversation about indoctrination, by way of song, of impressionable young minds at our schools?

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Yes, obviously a very stupid move by a very stupid person.  Do you really want to get into a conversation about indoctrination, by way of song, of impressionable young minds at our schools?

I can provide more if you wish, to show the racists doing their thing.

Oh yes and Negros can be racist.

Dr. Jones wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Yes, obviously a very stupid move by a very stupid person.  Do you really want to get into a conversation about indoctrination, by way of song, of impressionable young minds at our schools?

I can provide more if you wish, to show the racists doing their thing.

Oh yes and Negros can be racist.

Pulling the race card?  Wow.  I didn't see that coming.

Of course black people can be racist.  What's your point?

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Yes, obviously a very stupid move by a very stupid person.  Do you really want to get into a conversation about indoctrination, by way of song, of impressionable young minds at our schools?

I can provide more if you wish, to show the racists doing their thing.

Oh yes and Negros can be racist.

Pulling the race card?  Wow.  I didn't see that coming.

Of course black people can be racist.  What's your point?

If you think that Negros can be racist you are going against the liberal dogma of only white christians are racist.  And what race card did I play?  Conservatives don't have race cards.  Unless you are talking about Nascar.

Dr. Jones wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Yes, obviously a very stupid move by a very stupid person.  Do you really want to get into a conversation about indoctrination, by way of song, of impressionable young minds at our schools?

I can provide more if you wish, to show the racists doing their thing.

Oh yes and Negros can be racist.

Pulling the race card?  Wow.  I didn't see that coming.

Of course black people can be racist.  What's your point?

If you think that Negros can be racist you are going against the liberal dogma of only white christians are racist.  And what race card did I play?  Conservatives don't have race cards.  Unless you are talking about Nascar.

B.S.  Conservatives throw the race card like they throw $100's at hookers while trying to claim they are on some sort of moral high ground.  You were the one who brought up race, as usual.  

nightlight88 wrote:        Nope, its the Left's standard operating procedure.  Disagree with Obama = racism.

Time after time after time.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:
According to your link Obama's job disapproval rating is 50%.

!) When the President (or for that matter any incumbent's) approval rating drops below 50% it is not considered a good thing.

2) When a President's (or for that matter any incumbent's) disapproval numbers are larger than his approval numbers it is not considered a good thing.

Time to hit the reset button Nicci.