Big O hits it on jObs

223,000 notice all the OOOO's?  That's what Obama is all about when it comes to creating jObs.  5.3% unemployment.  We are now back on track to where we were before Bush and his cronies drove us in the ditch.  The only downfall is that participation rate is at the lowest levels we have seen since the Reagan era.

All in all, gOOd jOb!!

http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/02/news/economy/us-jobs-report-june-223000/index.html

Dr. Jones wrote:223,000 notice all the OOOO's?  That's what Obama is all about when it comes to creating jObs.  5.3% unemployment.  We are now back on track to where we were before Bush and his cronies drove us in the ditch.  The only downfall is that participation rate is at the lowest levels we have seen since the Reagan era.

All in all, gOOd jOb!!

http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/02/news/economy/us-jobs-report-june-223000/index.html

Same old lies and bullshitte by the left, different day.

You're an idiot.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/record-93626000-americans-not-labor-force-participation-rate-declines-626

A record 93,626,000 Americans 16 or older did not participate in the nation’s labor force in June, as the labor force participation rate dropped to 62.6 percent, a 38-year low, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

BladeRunner wrote:You're an idiot.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/record-93626000-americans-not-labor-force-participation-rate-declines-626

A record 93,626,000 Americans 16 or older did not participate in the nation’s labor force in June, as the labor force participation rate dropped to 62.6 percent, a 38-year low, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

It is the same old liberal crap, create welfare to buy votes and you end up with fewer people looking for a job.  In the minds of a dumbass liberal, they just hit the "Daily Double".  

I hate liberalism and the people who advance it.

Jammer wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:You're an idiot.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/record-93626000-americans-not-labor-force-participation-rate-declines-626

A record 93,626,000 Americans 16 or older did not participate in the nation’s labor force in June, as the labor force participation rate dropped to 62.6 percent, a 38-year low, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

It is the same old liberal crap, create welfare to buy votes and you end up with fewer people looking for a job.  In the minds of a dumbass liberal, they just hit the "Daily Double".  

I hate liberalism and the people who advance it.

Corollary #234 to Axiom 67:  There is often talk of Social Security running out of money to scare the workers who paid in to panic and follow a political agenda but there is never any mention of funds running out to provide food stamps and other "freebies" to those who think they are entitled to being provided for by working folks!

BladeRunner wrote:You're an idiot.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/record-93626000-americans-not-labor-force-participation-rate-declines-626

A record 93,626,000 Americans 16 or older did not participate in the nation’s labor force in June, as the labor force participation rate dropped to 62.6 percent, a 38-year low, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Hmm, 38 year low.... doesn't that put it right in the middle of Jimmy Carter's term ??

Seems like the ol peanut farmer and MT suit HMWAIC have something in common other than both being ineffective.

Enjoy and educate yourselves...

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/06/30/david_stockman_shock_blog_the_real_unemployment_rate_is_42_9

Skeptical wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:You're an idiot.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/record-93626000-americans-not-labor-force-participation-rate-declines-626

A record 93,626,000 Americans 16 or older did not participate in the nation’s labor force in June, as the labor force participation rate dropped to 62.6 percent, a 38-year low, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Hmm, 38 year low.... doesn't that put it right in the middle of Jimmy Carter's term ??

Seems like the ol peanut farmer and MT suit HMWAIC have something in common other than both being ineffective.

I am well aware that the math puts it just before Reagan took office.  Participation rates in the lower sixties persisted well into Reagan's presidency.  Hence the "Reagan era".  The point is that these levels are not as unusual as you would like them to be.  Sorry for the inconvenience.  The truth is that the participation rate hasn't changed +/- much more than 3.5% since the Reagan era.

The participation rate, aside from a short stint where it chopped sideways during Bush's presidency, has followed the same trend down since the late nineties.  Long before Obama. With the unemployment rate reaching 5% one would have to ask if these people have really given up hope of finding a job as Obama's critics claim, or are they simply not looking, as the trend would suggest.  At some point the hopelessness mantra is going to start looking pretty silly.

There are approximately 210 million people in this country between the ages of 18 and 65...working years (unless you are a liberal). Currently, 95 million people are unemployed or under employed in this country. Without using special liberal math...that's 45%. You going to believe the media or math?

Darth Cheney wrote:There are approximately 210 million people in this country between the ages of 18 and 65...working years (unless you are a liberal). Currently, 95 million people are unemployed or under employed in this country. Without using special liberal math...that's 45%. You going to believe the media or math?

B-b-b-b-u-u-u-t-t-t-t, 5.3% sounds so much better for the MT suit HMWAIC!

Darth Cheney wrote:There are approximately 210 million people in this country between the ages of 18 and 65...working years (unless you are a liberal). Currently, 95 million people are unemployed or under employed in this country. Without using special liberal math...that's 45%. You going to believe the media or math?

I'm going to use the standards that have been in place for decades. I don't tend to get my "facts" from taking heads like Limbaugh.

(attempting to imitate Mr. Welk)

Turn-a on the bubble-a machine-a.. ah-one, ah-two, ah-three ... all together now ...

D - E - N - I -A - L,   D - E - N - I -A - L

Dr. Jones wrote:223,000 notice all the OOOO's?  That's what Obama is all about when it comes to creating jObs.  5.3% unemployment.  We are now back on track to where we were before Bush and his cronies drove us in the ditch.  The only downfall is that participation rate is at the lowest levels we have seen since the Reagan era.

All in all, gOOd jOb!!

http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/02/news/economy/us-jobs-report-june-223000/index.html

I just love it when Mr Green Jeans tries to talk economics. If you want incisive economic analysis then nobody can beat the boys at Zero Hedge. In plain English they eviscerate the clueless one at 1600 Pennsylvania and his latest pack of lies.

"We are now 29 quarters from the pre-crisis peak and total non-farm labor hours utilized by the US economy are no higher than they were in Q4 2007. In other words, if you use a common unit of measure—–labor hours rather than job slots which treat coal-miners and part-time pizza delivery boys alike—–there have been no new units of employment at all. Our teleprompter reading President is actually tooting his own horn about recycled hours and “born again” jobs and doesn’t even know it."

And:

"There is no mystery as to how the White House and Wall Street celebrate year after year of “jobs growth” when the long-term trend of full-time, family-supporting employment levels is heading south. Its called “trickle-down economics”, and not of the good kind, either.

What is happening is that the Keynesian money printers at the Fed are fueling serial financial bubbles. This generates a temporary lift in the discretionary incomes of the top 10% of households, which own 85% of the financial assets, and the next 10-20% which feed off the their winnings. Accordingly, the leisure and hospitality sectors boom, creating a lot of job slots for bar tenders, waiters, bellhops, etc.

I call this the “bread and circuses economy”, but it has two problems. Most of these slots generate only about 26 hours per week and $14 per hour. That’s about $19,000 on an annual basis, and means these slots constitute 40% jobs compared to the breadwinner category at about $50,000 per year. Besides that, a soon as the financial bubble goes bust, these jobs quickly disappear."

Low paying, part time jobs. Thanks 'Bama, you worthless turd.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-07-03/barack-obama-tells-another-whopper-he-did-not-create-128-million-jobs

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:223,000 notice all the OOOO's?  That's what Obama is all about when it comes to creating jObs.  5.3% unemployment.  We are now back on track to where we were before Bush and his cronies drove us in the ditch.  The only downfall is that participation rate is at the lowest levels we have seen since the Reagan era.

All in all, gOOd jOb!!

http://money.cnn.com/2015/07/02/news/economy/us-jobs-report-june-223000/index.html

I just love it when Mr Green Jeans tries to talk economics. If you want incisive economic analysis then nobody can beat the boys at Zero Hedge. In plain English they eviscerate the clueless one at 1600 Pennsylvania and his latest pack of lies.

"We are now 29 quarters from the pre-crisis peak and total non-farm labor hours utilized by the US economy are no higher than they were in Q4 2007. In other words, if you use a common unit of measure—–labor hours rather than job slots which treat coal-miners and part-time pizza delivery boys alike—–there have been no new units of employment at all. Our teleprompter reading President is actually tooting his own horn about recycled hours and “born again”  jobs and doesn’t even know it."

And:

"There is no mystery as to how the White House and Wall Street celebrate year after year of “jobs growth” when the long-term trend of full-time, family-supporting employment levels is heading south. Its called “trickle-down economics”, and not of the good kind, either.

What is happening is that the Keynesian money printers at the Fed are fueling serial financial bubbles. This generates a temporary lift in the discretionary incomes of the top 10% of households, which own 85% of the financial assets, and the next 10-20% which feed off the their winnings. Accordingly, the leisure and hospitality sectors boom, creating a lot of job slots for bar tenders, waiters, bellhops, etc.

I call this the “bread and circuses economy”, but it has two problems. Most of these slots generate only about 26 hours per week and $14 per hour. That’s about $19,000 on an annual basis, and means these slots constitute 40% jobs compared to the breadwinner category at about $50,000 per year. Besides that, a soon as the financial bubble goes bust, these jobs quickly disappear."

Low paying, part time jobs. Thanks 'Bama, you worthless turd.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-07-03/barack-obama-tells-another-whopper-he-did-not-create-128-million-jobs

As usual, what an interesting choice of articles.  It's always fun to see where people get their ideologies from.  Maybe you should step up the quality of your reading a bit.  Surely nobody can beat the boys at Zero Hedge, mainly because nobody knows who they are.  Incisive economic analysis from people who post anonymously on the interweb??? Boy that's rich....

Then there's the guy from whom they cut and pasted this article, David Stockman.  He's a real colorful character.  He started out serving a few terms in the House until Reagan became so entranced with his economic prowess that he tapped him to head up writing his budget.  They had a nice relationship until he started bashing Reaganomics in an interview with 'The Atlantic' and let the cat out of the bag that Reagan's supply side economics were just a re-branding of the same old trickle-down philosophy conservatives had been pushing for years.  Without the re-branding though, according to him, it would have never passed.  Sounds familiar.  He also called the ReaganERTA of 1981 a "trojan horse" used to knock down the upper end tax rates.

After Reagan "took him to the wood shed" due to his transgressions, he decided Washington was a little too warm and fuzzy for him, so he took his expertise to Wall Street.  After mixed success there he started his own trading firm and later became CEO of Collins & Aikman, a manufacturing company.  He ended up running that company into the ground at the height of Bush's easy credit economic bubble, right when manufacturing should have been booming.  He was later indicted for fraud because of all the investor money he lost, which was never perused. He was sued and fined by the SEC instead for some illegal accounting practices.

He then went on to writing.  He wrote a book bashing capitalism in America, which was hailed in one review as a "confusing read".  He then started a blog called David Stockman's Contra Corner so he could tell the world all he knows.  Which is where he turned his turrets to Obama.  Sorry if I don't read the article you posted, but it's probably better that way.  Then I would be forced also to believe all of those horrible things he said about Reagan and capitalism.

Dr. Jones wrote:
As usual, what an interesting choice of articles.  It's always fun to see where people get their ideologies from.  Maybe you should step up the quality of your reading a bit.  Surely nobody can beat the boys at Zero Hedge, mainly because nobody knows who they are.  Incisive economic analysis from people who post anonymously on the interweb??? Boy that's rich....

Then there's the guy they cut and pasted this article from, David Stockman.  He's a real colorful character.  He started out serving a few terms in the House until Reagan became so entranced with his economic prowess that he tapped him to head up writing his budget for his "supply side economics".  They had a nice relationship until he started bashing Reaganomics in an interview with 'The Atlantic' and let the cat out of the bag that Reagan's supply side economics were just a re-branding of the same old trickle-down philosophy conservatives had been pushing for years.  Without the re-branding though, according to him, it would have never passed.  Sounds familiar.  He also called ERTA of 1981 a "trojan horse" used to knock down the upper end tax rates.

After Reagan "took him to the wood shed" due to his transgressions, he decided Washington was a little too warm and fuzzy for him, so he took his expertise to Wall Street.  After mixed success there he started his own trading firm and became CEO of Collins & Aikman.  He ended up running that company into the ground at the height of Bush's easy credit economic bubble.  He was later indicted for fraud because of all the money he lost for investors, but ended up settling on civil cases.

He then went on to writing.  He wrote a book bashing capitalism in America, which was hailed in one review as a "confusing read".  He then started a blog called David Stockman's Contra Corner so he could tell the world all he knows.  Which is where he turned his turrets to Obama.  Sorry if I don't read the article you posted, but it's probably better that way.  Then I would be forced also to believe all of those horrible things he said about Reagan and capitalism.

Yeah, we get it.  Facts and the truth are painful for jackoff liberals like you.  Why don't you go whine to someone who gives a shite.  May I suggest a welfare line full of dumbass lazy liberals waiting for their next handout from Obama.

Jammer wrote:
Yeah, we get it.  Facts and the truth are painful for jackoff liberals like you.  Why don't you go whine to someone who gives a shite.  May I suggest a welfare line full of dumbass lazy liberals waiting for their next handout from Obama.

How do you know DJ isn't in line and using his Obama phone to text??

Skeptical wrote:

Jammer wrote:    
Yeah, we get it.  Facts and the truth are painful for jackoff liberals like you.  Why don't you go whine to someone who gives a shite.  May I suggest a welfare line full of dumbass lazy liberals waiting for their next handout from Obama.

How do you know DJ isn't in line and using his Obama phone to text??

You're right, I don't know.  However, I would doubt it.  You see old DJ appears to be a liberal elitist in "his own mind".  Therefore, he probably "has people" who wait in those lines for him.

And you ask, "Why do you think DJ believes he is a liberal elitist?".  Well, since he is no doctor of any sorts and he uses the DR. title rather than going by his correct name of Jackoff Jones, I think it is rather self explanatory.

Stock market up BIG TIME today.

Shortie's Ex wrote:Stock market up BIG TIME today.

And just a few days ago it cratered because of Greece's impending collapse. The only reason the stock market is doing well (it certainly isn't because of our country's anemic GDP) is because money is cheap. Why invest it in bonds and cds paying almost zero interest when there's at least a bettor's chance of a decent ROI in the stock market? Also keep in mind that companies are involved in an historical stock buy back. While buying back their own stock not only boosts their stock prices they aren't even risking their own cash piles to buy it back instead borrowing it at almost zero interest. And any interest they do pay is tax deductible. Win, win, win, win. The stock market is a house of cards and when the Euro collapses because of Greece or Italy or Portugal look out because there will be crap hitting the fan in historic proportions.

Shortie's Ex wrote:Stock market up BIG TIME today.

And just what difference does that make to a dumbass liberal? Conservatives accept personal responsibility and invest in the stock market while liberals use their EBT cards and invest in dildos. Therefore it is obvious that a dumbass liberal doesn't have a clue what makes the stock market go up or down. They only worry about recharging their EBT card and making sure their dildo goes up and down.

Ahem....

The labor forces participation rate continues to emit that giant sucking sound registering a 38 year low with just 62.4% of the labor force working or looking for work.

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:You're an idiot.

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/record-93626000-americans-not-labor-force-participation-rate-declines-626

A record 93,626,000 Americans 16 or older did not participate in the nation’s labor force in June, as the labor force participation rate dropped to 62.6 percent, a 38-year low, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Hmm, 38 year low.... doesn't that put it right in the middle of Jimmy Carter's term ??

Seems like the ol peanut farmer and MT suit HMWAIC have something in common other than both being ineffective.

I am well aware that the math puts it just before Reagan took office.  Participation rates in the lower sixties persisted well into Reagan's presidency.  Hence the "Reagan era".  The point is that these levels are not as unusual as you would like them to be.  Sorry for the inconvenience.  The truth is that the participation rate hasn't changed +/- much more than 3.5% since the Reagan era.

The participation rate, aside from a short stint where it chopped sideways during Bush's presidency, has followed the same trend down since the late nineties.  Long before Obama. With the unemployment rate reaching 5% one would have to ask if these people have really given up hope of finding a job as Obama's critics claim, or are they simply not looking, as the trend would suggest.  At some point the hopelessness mantra is going to start looking pretty silly.

Been there,  done that.  You're going to have to try harder.

America has near record 5.6 million job openings
http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/09/news/economy/america-5-6-million-record-job-openings/

A little more insight to the legitimacy of the jobless rate, which finally dropped below 5%.

Dr. Jones wrote:America has near record 5.6 million job openings
http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/09/news/economy/america-5-6-million-record-job-openings/

A little more insight to the legitimacy of the jobless rate, which finally dropped below 5%.

That's great!!! I can't wait for public assistance to now drop. I mean it should go down right?