Re: What your neighbors may not know, but maybe should:

Darth Cheney Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:12 am

Again, liberals create the laws and feel good policies to line the pockets of the political class then when it all collapses blame everyone else. They truly speak with the tongue of Satan and not a word can be believed as truth.

Jammer Mon Dec 28, 2015 7:20 am

Darth Cheney wrote:Again, liberals create the laws and feel good policies to line the pockets of the political class then when it all collapses blame everyone else. They truly speak with the tongue of Satan and not a word can be believed as truth.

The amount of theft by the federal government in this country is astonishing. The sad things about this are that so many good conservatives do not see half of what is happening. If they did, they would be in open revolt against these evil liberals. But no, they live in harmony with the evil cretin living right down the street from them.

If a company commits a crime or is negligent in some manner that hurts the consumers, they should be severely fined. However, the money recovered in the criminal penalty must be directed to the people who were injured if they can be identified. In this example it would have been the investors who bought stock in these banks but saw their investments eroded. In cases where it is not able to quantify damages to a specific individual then the money must be deposited in the US Treasury to reduce the national debt and benefit the hard working taxpayers of this country. In no cases should this money be given to the cronies of the ruling class like what was done.

It is repulsive to see these useful idiots rush to the defense of the socialist elitists in this country. Just how utterly stupid can one be? But then again, the crumbs dribbled out to them by their ruling elitists is like a leash around their necks. In any event, they are delusional. Did you see the comment from Jackoff Jones where he claimed to be a financial genius because he ran a business of a million dollars? What a joke, a million dollars???? That is not a business, it is a hobby and besides that I will guarantee you that it was probably a fraction of that. He merely rounded it to the nearest million dollars for reporting purposes. What a fool.

In any event, there are always some treads of commonality that run through these progressive liberal sins. They always seem to:

Be in the name of the poor, the sick, the kids, the needy, the environment, etc.
There is always a demon they are attacking (oil companies, banks, the 1%, etc)
There is always a victim and who would have guessed it is always the liberals
And it is NEVER their fault
And finally the money, it always ends up in the hands of the evil liberals

Remember, only YOU can help prevent LIBERALISM in this country. Confront the evil cretins living down the street from you and tell them that good honest Americans have had ENOUGH of their sins.

Shortie's Ex Mon Dec 28, 2015 7:30 am

Please correct the name of this thread:

Chain e- mails which your neighbors may not have received, but maybe should:

Jammer Mon Dec 28, 2015 8:03 am

Shortie's Ex wrote:Please correct the name of this thread:

Chain e- mails which your neighbors may not have received, but maybe should:

Hey slut, the only correction needed is that YOU are now officially as stupid as Jackoff Jones. What is it with these progressive liberals? They all have IQs in the single digits.

Anyhow, YOU are now in the same category as Jackoff Jones. Conservatives are best served when they do not directly address useful idiots that have IQs less than an average rock. There is nothing that can be gained from talking directly to somebody who is so stupid that they have absolutely no means of comprehending what you are saying.

So take a hike slut. I am sure you and Jackoff Jones will find somebody naïve enough to talk to you. But it won't be me.

Dr. Evil Mon Dec 28, 2015 8:46 am

Jammer wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:Please correct the name of this thread:

Chain e- mails which your neighbors may not have received, but maybe should:

Hey slut, the only correction needed is that YOU are now officially as stupid as Jackoff Jones. What is it with these progressive liberals? They all have IQs in the single digits.

Anyhow, YOU are now in the same category as Jackoff Jones. Conservatives are best served when they do not directly address useful idiots that have IQs less than an average rock. There is nothing that can be gained from talking directly to somebody who is so stupid that they have absolutely no means of comprehending what you are saying.

So take a hike slut. I am sure you and Jackoff Jones will find somebody naïve enough to talk to you. But it won't be me.

Wow!! You kiss your sister with that mouth???

Where I come from people who run their mouth the way you do with absolutely nothing to back it up get their dick kicked in the dirt. How about you?

Jammer Mon Dec 28, 2015 9:24 am

Number 5 in a series of one million on

Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

My comment above about the traditional demons created by the evil progressive socialists got me thinking. In particular I remember a few months ago all of the chanting in the streets by the useful idiots of the socialist elitists about the evil 1% in this country who controlled 40% of the wealth.

I asked myself why are the useful idiots not concerned about the evil 0.2% that control over one third the wealth. It would seem that is a much bigger offense than the 1%. Oh wait, the 0.2% is THEM.

I am talking about our system of higher education in this country. I bet your neighbor doesn’t know that 0.2% of the universities in this country control one third of all the assets in the US higher education sector.

That’s right; colleges like Harvard, Yale and Dartmouth have endowments that dwarf the rest of the colleges in this country. Harvard alone has over $40 billion in assets. That is a staggering amount for a college. Why is 1% of the people owning 40% of the wealth in the private sector a problem, but a mere 0.2% of the colleges owning 33% of the assets in the education sector not a problem?

I guess the only answer can be that in the eyes of these evil cretins when a hard working American is successful and accumulates wealth, that is WRONG, but when a LIBERAL college that spews their liberal lies does it – NO PROBLEM.

I hate liberals – How about YOU?

Dr. Evil Mon Dec 28, 2015 10:51 am

Jammer wrote:
Number 5 in a series of one million on
Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

My comment above about the traditional demons created by the evil progressive socialists got me thinking. In particular I remember a few months ago all of the chanting in the streets by the useful idiots of the socialist elitists about the evil 1% in this country who controlled 40% of the wealth.

I asked myself why are the useful idiots not concerned about the evil 0.2% that control over one third the wealth. It would seem that is a much bigger offense than the 1%. Oh wait, the 0.2% is THEM.

I am talking about our system of higher education in this country. I bet your neighbor doesn’t know that 0.2% of the universities in this country control one third of all the assets in the US higher education sector.

That’s right; colleges like Harvard, Yale and Dartmouth have endowments that dwarf the rest of the colleges in this country. Harvard alone has over $40 billion in assets. That is a staggering amount for a college. Why is 1% of the people owning 40% of the wealth in the private sector a problem, but a mere 0.2% of the colleges owning 33% of the assets in the education sector not a problem?

I guess the only answer can be that in the eyes of these evil cretins when a hard working American is successful and accumulates wealth, that is WRONG, but when a LIBERAL college that spews their liberal lies does it – NO PROBLEM.

I hate liberals – How about YOU?

WTF are you talking about? Your little series of rants is starting to remind me of those stupid PP videos.

Shortie's Ex Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:23 am

Sticks and stones.

Shortie's Ex Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:34 am

Endowments and foundations are the way in which colleges and universities will sort into 'Survivors' and those who exit the higher education business over the next decade.

I am afraid state schools will continue to decline in this environment. That should make you giddy with glee.

Can't fault Harvard Yale and Dartmouth for trying to be certain that they will be among the survivors.

Shortie's Ex Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:35 am

But the true motive for Sub Rant 5. You are really paranoid that Bob Jones University, Liberty University and a couple of other places reliant upon religious fundamentalism might be among those who fall along the wayside.

Gomezz Adddams Mon Dec 28, 2015 12:12 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:
Jammer wrote:
Number 2 in a series of one million on
Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

Progressive liberals are parasites who benefit and live at the expense of its “host”. Progressive liberalism also known as socialism has never ever built anything. It has always identified an attractive opportunity and took it over. They then proceed to live off the wealth that was built by others until the money runs out just like in the old USSR. The Socialist States of Russia did not end because the parasites changed their ideology; they ran out of other peoples’ money.

These parasite progressive liberals not only suck a country dry, but they also identify and attack organizations. Above I referenced the McArthur Foundation where a hard working conservative left his money to charity without the proper safeguards to protect it from these parasitic progressive socialists like Jackoff Jones who now control it and use Mr. McArthur’s money for things he would never support.

There are hundreds of similar examples in this country besides the McArthur Foundation. I will give you just one more, the Anneberg Foundation. Take a look at Mr. Anneberg and who he was and what he believed in:

https://www.wharton.upenn.edu/125anniversaryissue/annenberg.html

Today his Anneberg Foundation is overrun by progressive liberals who misuse his money for things he would never ever support.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122212856075765367

But that is not my point today, it is merely one more data point leading up to what I want to talk about and that is the way progressive liberals not only use other peoples’ money against them but how they hide their true identities and intentions under the banner of “Charity”.

The slimy hypocritical liberals are always complaining about how corporations are allowed to donate to candidates and causes. They scream about corporations are being treated the same as people by the courts and the Constitution. They personally attack good people like Charles and David Koch. However, they never ever tell you about “The Funders Committee for Civic Participation”. Well I think that is something we should all learn about and more importantly tell our friends and relatives about. It is just one huge evil snake slithering thru the grass.

I would love to rant and rave about this scumbag organization. However, I am going to direct you to a link that tells their story much better than I ever could. Please take the time to read the following article and more importantly – TELL YOUR FRIENDS and RELATIVES.

http://capitalresearch.org/2015/10/partisan-donors-hiding-under-charitys-banner/

It is time to TAKE BACK THE NARRATIVE
Mr. Annenberg was actively running his own foundation until his death in 2002. If he had an issue with the way Obama was managing his money in the CAC, don't you think he would have said something?

To micromanage a program of the scale of the Annenberg Challenge would have been impossible as the Challenge took place in many cities not just Chicago. And it wouldn't have mattered as all the individual challenges failed just like in Chicago. Why? Because just throwing money at bloated Liberal public school systems that favor their own bureaucracies and teacher unions over children's educations has never and will never work. It was just one giant clown parade and yet the Clown in Chief still rejects any lessons that should have been learned from this debacle with an encore performance in his own "Race to the Top" except this time he pissed $4B of public money down the country's collective leg in a disastrous repeat of his and Ayers failure in Chicago.

Gomezz Adddams Mon Dec 28, 2015 12:36 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:I've never really spent much time looking into Bill Ayres. He's kind of a fascinating guy. He went from being dangerously rebellious to being a respectable leader in the education arena. It baffles me that someone with his past can rise to such prominence in this country today, but those were different times:

"OK, seriously, I was an asshole. People were hurt. I truly regret that. Mistakes were made; I won't deny that. But hindsight is 20-20. It's easy to sit here now and be judgmental. We aren't under the gun. There's no Vietnam war going on. My point is that the context of those times is impossible to re-create. That doesn't justify anything; it only means that there are no scientifically correct formulas from which to make the right decisions.

As he says, his actions can't be justified. People sometimes feel though, like they are pushed to their breaking point. I can't imagine the thought of young men being forced (drafted) by our government to go fight for someone else. It really suggests to me that the motives at the time were not all that pure, but I wouldn't know, I wasn't there. I don't know how I would have handled it.

The thing that really troubles me the most is that as I read about some of the terrible things he did and his frame of mind at the time, his hateful rhetoric really reminds me of what is going on today with our country's fight over Islam, guns, abortion, and racial tension with some police departments. I feel like we are on the verge of more widespread attacks like the ones he instigated if we don't change our rhetoric in this country. We've already seen it over the past few months against Planned Parenthood, since those heavily edited and sensationalized videos were released. We are on a dangerous path, and we need to change our ways.

I lived during those times. I remember the SDS and the Weathermen. They were violent Communist terrorists not only intent on ending the war in Vietnam, but in overthrowing the US government and instituting a Communist government.

One could protest the war, as I did, peacefully. One didn't need to build bombs to kill people to end the war like Ayers and his wife did. Thankfully they were incredibly incompetent at building bombs succeeding in only blowing themselves up.

The mentally deranged individual that shot up Planned Parenthood didn't even come close to what Ayers and his Gang that Couldn't Shoot Straight conspired and attempted in their serial bombings of government buildings and bank robberies to fund their agenda.

Jammer Mon Dec 28, 2015 1:04 pm

Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Jammer wrote:
Number 2 in a series of one million on
Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

Progressive liberals are parasites who benefit and live at the expense of its “host”. Progressive liberalism also known as socialism has never ever built anything. It has always identified an attractive opportunity and took it over. They then proceed to live off the wealth that was built by others until the money runs out just like in the old USSR. The Socialist States of Russia did not end because the parasites changed their ideology; they ran out of other peoples’ money.

These parasite progressive liberals not only suck a country dry, but they also identify and attack organizations. Above I referenced the McArthur Foundation where a hard working conservative left his money to charity without the proper safeguards to protect it from these parasitic progressive socialists like Jackoff Jones who now control it and use Mr. McArthur’s money for things he would never support.

There are hundreds of similar examples in this country besides the McArthur Foundation. I will give you just one more, the Anneberg Foundation. Take a look at Mr. Anneberg and who he was and what he believed in:

https://www.wharton.upenn.edu/125anniversaryissue/annenberg.html

Today his Anneberg Foundation is overrun by progressive liberals who misuse his money for things he would never ever support.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB122212856075765367

But that is not my point today, it is merely one more data point leading up to what I want to talk about and that is the way progressive liberals not only use other peoples’ money against them but how they hide their true identities and intentions under the banner of “Charity”.

The slimy hypocritical liberals are always complaining about how corporations are allowed to donate to candidates and causes. They scream about corporations are being treated the same as people by the courts and the Constitution. They personally attack good people like Charles and David Koch. However, they never ever tell you about “The Funders Committee for Civic Participation”. Well I think that is something we should all learn about and more importantly tell our friends and relatives about. It is just one huge evil snake slithering thru the grass.

I would love to rant and rave about this scumbag organization. However, I am going to direct you to a link that tells their story much better than I ever could. Please take the time to read the following article and more importantly – TELL YOUR FRIENDS and RELATIVES.

http://capitalresearch.org/2015/10/partisan-donors-hiding-under-charitys-banner/

It is time to TAKE BACK THE NARRATIVE
Mr. Annenberg was actively running his own foundation until his death in 2002. If he had an issue with the way Obama was managing his money in the CAC, don't you think he would have said something?

To micromanage a program of the scale of the Annenberg Challenge would have been impossible as the Challenge took place in many cities not just Chicago. And it wouldn't have mattered as all the individual challenges failed just like in Chicago. Why? Because just throwing money at bloated Liberal public school systems that favor their own bureaucracies and teacher unions over children's educations has never and will never work. It was just one giant clown parade and yet the Clown in Chief still rejects any lessons that should have been learned from this debacle with an encore performance in his own "Race to the Top" except this time he pissed $4B of public money down the country's collective leg in a disastrous repeat of his and Ayers failure in Chicago.

While you are correct Gomez, Annenberg was into his late 80's at the time. In addition the foundation was a fraction of this guy's empire, so even if he had the mental capacity or the energy he was not running this foundation at any level outside of picking some people to do it for him. And I am sure that is where he went wrong.

Spend a few days in any retirement center and watch the people who are almost 90 years old. Almost every time there is a decision to be made, a family member is the one who ultimately makes the choice even if mom or dad thinks they pulled the trigger.

Mr. Annenberg probably made several bad choices beginning with setting his foundation up too late in life. Those types of decisions are best made at a younger age when a person's decision making capabilities are sharper. It is obvious that he put his trust in people to carry out his wishers rather than a codified structural system that was compelled to follow his wishes. And finally like way too many people he chose people closest to him (children) to run things. It is always a much better decision to choose someone who is close to you in your ideology and values that you explicitly trust. Rarely do problems happen then.

On another front, I wonder why you spend so much time responding to Jackoff Jones' comments. The cretin is a total moron. There are a million examples, but I will give just one. The other day when both you and I challenged him on his understanding of finance he came back both times that we needed to take up the issue with some poor little old lady that ran some trinket store. The moron thought we were talking about how SHE ran her business.

My God, if a person can't even connect 2 dots and understand what the issue is that he is responding to, why do you waste your time with him. When 2 people are communicating in public and there are bystanders watching, human nature often compels them to make some assessments. Well when one of the people talking is am intelligent well educated individual and the other is a total moron and the discussion continues there can only be two conclusions. One is that both of those talking are intelligent people or both are morons. Don't let the biggest moron in the western hemisphere drag you down to his level.

Dr. Evil Mon Dec 28, 2015 1:09 pm

Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:I've never really spent much time looking into Bill Ayres. He's kind of a fascinating guy. He went from being dangerously rebellious to being a respectable leader in the education arena. It baffles me that someone with his past can rise to such prominence in this country today, but those were different times:

"OK, seriously, I was an asshole. People were hurt. I truly regret that. Mistakes were made; I won't deny that. But hindsight is 20-20. It's easy to sit here now and be judgmental. We aren't under the gun. There's no Vietnam war going on. My point is that the context of those times is impossible to re-create. That doesn't justify anything; it only means that there are no scientifically correct formulas from which to make the right decisions.

As he says, his actions can't be justified. People sometimes feel though, like they are pushed to their breaking point. I can't imagine the thought of young men being forced (drafted) by our government to go fight for someone else. It really suggests to me that the motives at the time were not all that pure, but I wouldn't know, I wasn't there. I don't know how I would have handled it.

The thing that really troubles me the most is that as I read about some of the terrible things he did and his frame of mind at the time, his hateful rhetoric really reminds me of what is going on today with our country's fight over Islam, guns, abortion, and racial tension with some police departments. I feel like we are on the verge of more widespread attacks like the ones he instigated if we don't change our rhetoric in this country. We've already seen it over the past few months against Planned Parenthood, since those heavily edited and sensationalized videos were released. We are on a dangerous path, and we need to change our ways.

I lived during those times. I remember the SDS and the Weathermen. They were violent Communist terrorists not only intent on ending the war in Vietnam, but in overthrowing the US government and instituting a Communist government.

One could protest the war, as I did, peacefully. One didn't need to build bombs to kill people to end the war like Ayers and his wife did. Thankfully they were incredibly incompetent at building bombs succeeding in only blowing themselves up.

The mentally deranged individual that shot up Planned Parenthood didn't even come close to what Ayers and his Gang that Couldn't Shoot Straight conspired and attempted in their serial bombings of government buildings and bank robberies to fund their agenda.

Oh please.... Sensationalize much?? The buffoon that shot up the PP center in Colorado Springs squeaked out three kills with a quarter of a brain. Bill Ayres actually had a brain on his shoulders. He didn't kill anyone because he had no intentions of doing so.

Jammer Mon Dec 28, 2015 8:41 pm

Hey Gomez, after our little exchange above on the management of foundations and having it follow the donor's wishes, I did a little digging. The following link takes you to an article about how Margaret Cargill set up her foundation. From what I read, it is one of the better approaches. She did it early, got her wishes and intentions in writing and more importantly hired somebody she could trust to carry out her wishes rather than just defaulting to a family member.

http://capitalresearch.org/2015/08/more-than-a-portrait-on-the-wall-preserving-donor-intent-at-the-margaret-a-cargill-philanthropies/

I thought it was interesting reading and thought you might also enjoy.

Dr. Evil Mon Dec 28, 2015 9:33 pm

Jammer wrote:Hey Gomez, after our little exchange above on the management of foundations and having it follow the donor's wishes, I did a little digging. The following link takes you to an article about how Margaret Cargill set up her foundation. From what I read, it is one of the better approaches. She did it early, got her wishes and intentions in writing and more importantly hired somebody she could trust to carry out her wishes rather than just defaulting to a family member.

http://capitalresearch.org/2015/08/more-than-a-portrait-on-the-wall-preserving-donor-intent-at-the-margaret-a-cargill-philanthropies/

I thought it was interesting reading and thought you might also enjoy.

Ahhh yes, hire someone you can trust to head up the operation. What a novel idea. You mean like when Annenberg hired long time friend Vartan Gregorian to direct funds for the majority of his $500M challenge? A challenge that Gregorian himself described as "scrupulously nonpartisan". Not to mention the fact that it was launched from the Clinton White House.

Jammer Tue Dec 29, 2015 9:14 am

Number 6 in a series of one million on

Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

Here is what AARP says they are:

AARP wrote:AARP is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, with a membership of more than 37 million, that helps people turn their goals and dreams into real possibilities, strengthens communities and fights for the issues that matter most to families such as healthcare, employment security and retirement planning.

But AARP is far from that. What they really are is a huge insurance company and far left leaning activist group masquerading as a nonpartisan, nonprofit, tax exempt organization and associated charitable foundation. They are a sham.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2012/09/22/the-aarps-2-8-billion-reasons-for-supporting-obamacares-cuts-to-medicare/

AARP was one of the most vocal activist groups for the passage of Obamacare. They are also a conduit for getting funds to ACORN type groups to support socialist democrat candidates. The AARP Foundation recently received a $3 million grant from the federal government or should I say American taxpayers. This grant came from what is called the Social Innovation fund which is a community organizing slush fund that Obama uses to enrich his far left leaning friends.

AARP has received $1 BILLION in grants over the past years. What is an organization that makes untold billions from the sale of insurance and other items to unsuspecting senior citizens, PAYS NO TAXES, lobbies for far left leaning policies and actively supporting democrat candidates doing getting $1 BILLION in US taxpayer money on the side? This is unconscionable well unless you are a progressive socialist like the evil cretin Jackoff Jones.

Cancel your AARP membership and tell your friends and relatives to do the same.

Jammer Tue Dec 29, 2015 7:41 pm

Number 7 in a series of one million on

Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

Are you a hard working American and have you ever wondered what Obama and the progressive liberals think about you? No need to wonder any longer, just take a look at Obama’s very own words that he has spoken since becoming president.

If you are successful in the private sector, you are one of society’s LOTTERY winners.
If you own a business, you didn’t build it. Somebody else made that happen.
Government employees are the LEADERS of today’s progress and the INNOVATORS of tomorrow’s breakthroughs.

Perhaps your hard working friends and relatives would be interested in knowing just what their liberal neighbors think of them.

In any event, I guess that is why progressive liberals believe in deficit spending and borrowing money we don’t have to pay for it. They consider it an INVESTMENT in the future of the country. The more government employees we have the brighter our future.

Dr. Evil Wed Dec 30, 2015 1:14 pm

Jammer wrote:
Number 7 in a series of one million on
Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

Are you a hard working American and have you ever wondered what Obama and the progressive liberals think about you? No need to wonder any longer, just take a look at Obama’s very own words that he has spoken since becoming president.

If you are successful in the private sector, you are one of society’s LOTTERY winners.
If you own a business, you didn’t build it. Somebody else made that happen.
Government employees are the LEADERS of today’s progress and the INNOVATORS of tomorrow’s breakthroughs.

Perhaps your hard working friends and relatives would be interested in knowing just what their liberal neighbors think of them.

In any event, I guess that is why progressive liberals believe in deficit spending and borrowing money we don’t have to pay for it. They consider it an INVESTMENT in the future of the country. The more government employees we have the brighter our future.

Lies, lies, and more lies. To lie the way you do to promote your own personal political agenda is extremely unpatriotic and bordering on treasonous.

The "lottery winners" comment was referring to people running hedge funds, which are all liberal according to you and lower than dog excrement. Not the "private sector" as you so eloquently mis-characterized it.

The "you didn't build it" line that is often used by worthless liars like yourself completely misrepresents his statements which were actually referring to general infrastructure that is essential to any business. You didn't build roads, you didn't build the Internet, you didn't build the justice system that protects your business. Not to mention your employees who actually do all the heavy lifting.

The "leaders" and "innovaters" he refers to are actually military personnel, teachers, firemen, policemen, et al. that serve, protect, and teach your dumb ass. You have an interesting way of showing gratitude.

Jammer Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:31 pm

Number 8 in a series of one million on

Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

I am sure everyone remembers the illegal targeting of conservative groups by the IRS during Obama’s first term in office. This illegal bullying by the IRS was one of the reasons the worst president in the history of this country was re-elected to a second term.

Do you remember the words of the lying liberal in the White House as he pretended to be a fair and impartial leader in the investigation of this criminal activity?

If, in fact, IRS personnel engaged in the kind of practices that have been reported on and were intentionally targeting conservative groups, then that is outrageous, and there is no place for it, and they have to be held fully accountable, because the IRS as an independent agency requires absolute integrity and people have to have confidence that they are applying the laws in a nonpartisan way. You should feel that way regardless of party.

Not only was there evidence to show criminal activity, but in 2013 Lois Lerner said:

However, in these cases, the way they did the centralization was not so fine. Instead of referring to the cases as advocacy cases, they actually used case names on this list. They used names like Tea Party or Patriots and they selected cases simply because the applications had those names in the title. That was wrong, that was absolutely incorrect, insensitive, and inappropriate — that’s not how we go about selecting cases for further review.

So now fast forward all these years and what has happened? Well first of all, Obama’s Department of Justice has not brought criminal charges against anyone. Nobody was prosecuted for their crimes. And if that isn’t bad enough, conservative groups are still being targeted and denied tax exempt status.

The Albuquerque TEA Party and the Ohio based Unite In Action are just two of the groups who continue to be unjustly discriminated against. The Albuquerque TEA Party’s application dates back to over 6 years ago. I will bet that your friends and relatives don't know this.

Dr. Evil Wed Dec 30, 2015 5:49 pm

Jammer wrote:
Number 8 in a series of one million on
Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

I am sure everyone remembers the illegal targeting of conservative groups by the IRS during Obama’s first term in office. This illegal bullying by the IRS was one of the reasons the worst president in the history of this country was re-elected to a second term.

Do you remember the words of the lying liberal in the White House as he pretended to be a fair and impartial leader in the investigation of this criminal activity?

If, in fact, IRS personnel engaged in the kind of practices that have been reported on and were intentionally targeting conservative groups, then that is outrageous, and there is no place for it, and they have to be held fully accountable, because the IRS as an independent agency requires absolute integrity and people have to have confidence that they are applying the laws in a nonpartisan way. You should feel that way regardless of party.

Not only was there evidence to show criminal activity, but in 2013 Lois Lerner said:

However, in these cases, the way they did the centralization was not so fine. Instead of referring to the cases as advocacy cases, they actually used case names on this list. They used names like Tea Party or Patriots and they selected cases simply because the applications had those names in the title. That was wrong, that was absolutely incorrect, insensitive, and inappropriate — that’s not how we go about selecting cases for further review.

So now fast forward all these years and what has happened? Well first of all, Obama’s Department of Justice has not brought criminal charges against anyone. Nobody was prosecuted for their crimes. And if that isn’t bad enough, conservative groups are still being targeted and denied tax exempt status.

The Albuquerque TEA Party and the Ohio based Unite In Action are just two of the groups who continue to be unjustly discriminated against. The Albuquerque TEA Party’s application dates back to over 6 years ago. I will bet that your friends and relatives don't know this.

This was more of a case of biased investigation on the part of congressional republicans than it was biased scrutiny on the part of the IRS. It's not the IRS's fault that groups trying to defraud the gubberment are predominantly conservative. Just like it's not the "liberal media's" fault that the truth doesn't favor conservatives. Just like it's not Snopes or Factcheck.org's fault that lies spread on the internet are predominantly conservative lies.

Shortie's Ex Wed Dec 30, 2015 11:02 pm

These chain emails are arriving at a fervent pace to close the year. I wonder if someone is trying to maximize an annual performance bonus opportunity.

Gomezz Adddams Thu Dec 31, 2015 12:29 am

Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:I've never really spent much time looking into Bill Ayres. He's kind of a fascinating guy. He went from being dangerously rebellious to being a respectable leader in the education arena. It baffles me that someone with his past can rise to such prominence in this country today, but those were different times:

"OK, seriously, I was an asshole. People were hurt. I truly regret that. Mistakes were made; I won't deny that. But hindsight is 20-20. It's easy to sit here now and be judgmental. We aren't under the gun. There's no Vietnam war going on. My point is that the context of those times is impossible to re-create. That doesn't justify anything; it only means that there are no scientifically correct formulas from which to make the right decisions.

As he says, his actions can't be justified. People sometimes feel though, like they are pushed to their breaking point. I can't imagine the thought of young men being forced (drafted) by our government to go fight for someone else. It really suggests to me that the motives at the time were not all that pure, but I wouldn't know, I wasn't there. I don't know how I would have handled it.

The thing that really troubles me the most is that as I read about some of the terrible things he did and his frame of mind at the time, his hateful rhetoric really reminds me of what is going on today with our country's fight over Islam, guns, abortion, and racial tension with some police departments. I feel like we are on the verge of more widespread attacks like the ones he instigated if we don't change our rhetoric in this country. We've already seen it over the past few months against Planned Parenthood, since those heavily edited and sensationalized videos were released. We are on a dangerous path, and we need to change our ways.

I lived during those times. I remember the SDS and the Weathermen. They were violent Communist terrorists not only intent on ending the war in Vietnam, but in overthrowing the US government and instituting a Communist government.

One could protest the war, as I did, peacefully. One didn't need to build bombs to kill people to end the war like Ayers and his wife did. Thankfully they were incredibly incompetent at building bombs succeeding in only blowing themselves up.

The mentally deranged individual that shot up Planned Parenthood didn't even come close to what Ayers and his Gang that Couldn't Shoot Straight conspired and attempted in their serial bombings of government buildings and bank robberies to fund their agenda.
Oh please.... Sensationalize much?? The buffoon that shot up the PP center in Colorado Springs squeaked out three kills with a quarter of a brain. Bill Ayres actually had a brain on his shoulders. He didn't kill anyone because he had no intentions of doing so.

That's pure bullshit. From a Vanity Fair article on the Weathermen:

Bill Ayers and others would always insist there were never any plans to harm people. The handful of Weathermen who crossed that line, Ayers claims, were rogues and outliers. This is a myth, pure and simple, designed to obscure what Weathermen actually planned. In the middle ranks, it was widely expected that Weathermen would become revolutionary murderers. "My image of what we were going to be was undiluted terrorist action," recalls a Weatherman named Jon Lerner. “I remember talking about putting a bomb on the [Chicago railroad] tracks at rush hour, to blow up people coming home from work. That’s what I was looking forward to.”

About the Berkley Hall of Justice bombing:

“We wanted to do it at a shift change, frankly, to maximize deaths,” says one of the Weatherman cadre who took part in the action that night. “They were cops, so anyone was fair game. Basically, it was seen as a successful action. But others, yeah, were angry that a policeman didn’t die. There was no one that was anti that. That was what we were trying to do.”

On planning for the Fort Dix bombing which ended in the bomb detonating while being built leveling a Greenwich Village townhouse:

On Thursday, March 5, Robbins chaired a final meeting in the townhouse kitchen, going over details and assignments for the attack. A new face was present: Diana Oughton, Ayers’s girlfriend, who had been transferred to join the group. If Oughton was uncomfortable with the plan—an attack that, if successful, would amount to mass murder—she showed no sign. Neither did anyone else at the table. In fact, according to Cathy Wilkerson, there was no talk whatsoever about the decision to actually kill people. Years later she admitted that she had viewed those they planned to kill only as an “abstraction.”

Fascinating read:

http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/03/weather-underground-bomb-guru-burrough-excerpt

Dr. Evil Thu Dec 31, 2015 8:30 am

Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:I've never really spent much time looking into Bill Ayres. He's kind of a fascinating guy. He went from being dangerously rebellious to being a respectable leader in the education arena. It baffles me that someone with his past can rise to such prominence in this country today, but those were different times:

"OK, seriously, I was an asshole. People were hurt. I truly regret that. Mistakes were made; I won't deny that. But hindsight is 20-20. It's easy to sit here now and be judgmental. We aren't under the gun. There's no Vietnam war going on. My point is that the context of those times is impossible to re-create. That doesn't justify anything; it only means that there are no scientifically correct formulas from which to make the right decisions.

As he says, his actions can't be justified. People sometimes feel though, like they are pushed to their breaking point. I can't imagine the thought of young men being forced (drafted) by our government to go fight for someone else. It really suggests to me that the motives at the time were not all that pure, but I wouldn't know, I wasn't there. I don't know how I would have handled it.

The thing that really troubles me the most is that as I read about some of the terrible things he did and his frame of mind at the time, his hateful rhetoric really reminds me of what is going on today with our country's fight over Islam, guns, abortion, and racial tension with some police departments. I feel like we are on the verge of more widespread attacks like the ones he instigated if we don't change our rhetoric in this country. We've already seen it over the past few months against Planned Parenthood, since those heavily edited and sensationalized videos were released. We are on a dangerous path, and we need to change our ways.

I lived during those times. I remember the SDS and the Weathermen. They were violent Communist terrorists not only intent on ending the war in Vietnam, but in overthrowing the US government and instituting a Communist government.

One could protest the war, as I did, peacefully. One didn't need to build bombs to kill people to end the war like Ayers and his wife did. Thankfully they were incredibly incompetent at building bombs succeeding in only blowing themselves up.

The mentally deranged individual that shot up Planned Parenthood didn't even come close to what Ayers and his Gang that Couldn't Shoot Straight conspired and attempted in their serial bombings of government buildings and bank robberies to fund their agenda.
Oh please.... Sensationalize much?? The buffoon that shot up the PP center in Colorado Springs squeaked out three kills with a quarter of a brain. Bill Ayres actually had a brain on his shoulders. He didn't kill anyone because he had no intentions of doing so.

That's pure bullshit. From a Vanity Fair article on the Weathermen:

Bill Ayers and others would always insist there were never any plans to harm people. The handful of Weathermen who crossed that line, Ayers claims, were rogues and outliers. This is a myth, pure and simple, designed to obscure what Weathermen actually planned. In the middle ranks, it was widely expected that Weathermen would become revolutionary murderers. "My image of what we were going to be was undiluted terrorist action," recalls a Weatherman named Jon Lerner. “I remember talking about putting a bomb on the [Chicago railroad] tracks at rush hour, to blow up people coming home from work. That’s what I was looking forward to.”

About the Berkley Hall of Justice bombing:

“We wanted to do it at a shift change, frankly, to maximize deaths,” says one of the Weatherman cadre who took part in the action that night. “They were cops, so anyone was fair game. Basically, it was seen as a successful action. But others, yeah, were angry that a policeman didn’t die. There was no one that was anti that. That was what we were trying to do.”

On planning for the Fort Dix bombing which ended in the bomb detonating while being built leveling a Greenwich Village townhouse:

On Thursday, March 5, Robbins chaired a final meeting in the townhouse kitchen, going over details and assignments for the attack. A new face was present: Diana Oughton, Ayers’s girlfriend, who had been transferred to join the group. If Oughton was uncomfortable with the plan—an attack that, if successful, would amount to mass murder—she showed no sign. Neither did anyone else at the table. In fact, according to Cathy Wilkerson, there was no talk whatsoever about the decision to actually kill people. Years later she admitted that she had viewed those they planned to kill only as an “abstraction.”

Fascinating read:

http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/03/weather-underground-bomb-guru-burrough-excerpt

OK, so I quit reading at the part where a bomb blew a woman's blouse off. I'm more into reading historical works than I am fantasy novels. Here's a question. Does this piece of fiction explain how Ayres and his supposed army of 100 radical, natural born killers who were grown men and women, supposedly carried out dozens of elaborately planned bombings, over seven years, couldn't hit one single intended target using heavy explosives?!?

Even Carrot Top put them to shame with his simple point and click style attack in a matter of less than fifteen minutes in a Colorado movie theatre, with deadly perfection.

Your argument is absurd.

Jammer Thu Dec 31, 2015 9:22 am

Number 9 in a series of one million on

Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

While Obama’s Department of Justice turns a blind eye to the illegal and criminal activities of the IRS in targeting conservative organizations, the IRS allows liberal tax exempt foundations to violate numerous laws and use their tax exempt funds illegally. None are more corrupt than the Clinton Foundation as well as the associated smaller foundations the Clintons control.

http://capitalresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/FW0515.pdf

It is time for Americans to demand that these corrupt and illegal progressive liberal foundations be audited and brought to justice.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/11/04/republican-national-committee-asks-irs-to-audit-clinton-foundation-charity/

And the only way this is going to happen is if we take a stand against these evil liberals and end their reign of terror and corruption in this country. You can help by pointing out these evil cretins who live in your neighborhood to your friends and family. These people do not deserve to live among honorable Americans. And most certainly we don't need to be electing the criminals who these useful idiots support.

Sponsored content