Cost of ObamaCare subsidies has increased dramatically

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/08/administration-quietly-announces-relaxed-standards-for-obamacare-subsidies/

More people on the government dole.

Our country is now a utopia for those accepting government aid for everything in their lives...

The Department of Health and Human Services quietly announced Friday it was tweaking the rules requiring those seeking federal aid for insurance coverage to prove they actually need the help

see they have already fixed it. Nothing to see here, move along.        

Freedom Forever wrote:

The Department of Health and Human Services quietly announced Friday it was tweaking the rules requiring those seeking federal aid for insurance coverage to prove they actually need the help

see they have already fixed it. Nothing to see here, move along.        

Does anybody else wonder why Obama is STILL going around trying to sell ObamaCare to the American people?

It's the law of the land, why does he continue to go around and campaign for it?

You know, because according to St. John the Thornton over at GPLV, our health care costs are going down. That alone is evidence that it is selling itself........

Yeah, that last statement was pure  

BladeRunner wrote:

Does anybody else wonder why Obama is STILL going around trying to sell ObamaCare to the American people?

It's the law of the land, why does he continue to go around and campaign for it?

You know, because according to St. John the Thornton over at GPLV, our health care costs are going down. That alone is evidence that it is selling itself........

Yeah, that last statement was pure  

The MT suit has never stopped campaigning.  This plan is so bad they have to delay it a year, in order to survive the mid terms.

BladeRunner wrote:http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/09/another-day-another-obamacare-glitch-this-one-involves-smokers/

I expect that will be an easy fix on the software.
Do you disagree with smokers paying higher premiums? Why? They do now with nearly all major insurers.

Because a DA poster who visits here tol us everyone loves Obamacare and all the great things it has already done and will do...why are these federal employees objecting to share in Obamacare's benefits?

http://washingtonexaminer.com/irs-employee-union-we-dont-want-obamacare/article/2533520?custom_click=rss

Darth Cheney wrote:Because a DA poster who visits here tol us everyone loves Obamacare and all the great things it has already done and will do...why are these federal employees objecting to share in Obamacare's benefits?

http://washingtonexaminer.com/irs-employee-union-we-dont-want-obamacare/article/2533520?custom_click=rss

Since you value my opinion so much, Darth - I give you my thoughts - - -
I suspect that they are objecting because they like their current plan. Actually, their current plan is nearly exactly the same as what was originally proposed for the PPACA.

We all could have had access to that plan. Unfortunately, the republicans in congress fought it. Consequently, we got the compromise (essentially, the republican plan from the 90's). That is not as good as the plan most federal employees and congress have now, but it is the plan that became law.

The NTEU is objecting because of that downgrade. I suspect that future revisions to the ACA will re-instate the plan similar to what they have now. Congress will see it's benefits, even though some will cry "socialism". IMO, the single-payer plan is inevitable.

RedWhiteBlue wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:Because a DA poster who visits here tol us everyone loves Obamacare and all the great things it has already done and will do...why are these federal employees objecting to share in Obamacare's benefits?

http://washingtonexaminer.com/irs-employee-union-we-dont-want-obamacare/article/2533520?custom_click=rss

Since you value my opinion so much, Darth - I give you my thoughts - - -
I suspect that they are objecting because they like their current plan. Actually, their current plan is nearly exactly the same as what was originally proposed for the PPACA.

We all could have had access to that plan. Unfortunately, the republicans in congress fought it. Consequently, we got the compromise (essentially, the republican plan from the 90's). That is not as good as the plan most federal employees and congress have now, but it is the plan that became law.

The NTEU is objecting because of that downgrade. I suspect that future revisions to the ACA will re-instate the plan similar to what they have now. Congress will see it's benefits, even though some will cry "socialism". IMO, the single-payer plan is inevitable.

Compromise... another revisionist lying liberal. There wasn't any compromise...in fact the republicans had zero input on the Obamacare legislation and it passed with 100% democrat support. Even given those facts, you pull "it was the republicans fault of some lame ass compromise"...you are as despicable as the POS in the White House. F'n poser/hack.

Darth Cheney wrote:

RedWhiteBlue wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:Because a DA poster who visits here tol us everyone loves Obamacare and all the great things it has already done and will do...why are these federal employees objecting to share in Obamacare's benefits?

http://washingtonexaminer.com/irs-employee-union-we-dont-want-obamacare/article/2533520?custom_click=rss

Since you value my opinion so much, Darth - I give you my thoughts - - -
I suspect that they are objecting because they like their current plan. Actually, their current plan is nearly exactly the same as what was originally proposed for the PPACA.

We all could have had access to that plan. Unfortunately, the republicans in congress fought it. Consequently, we got the compromise (essentially, the republican plan from the 90's). That is not as good as the plan most federal employees and congress have now, but it is the plan that became law.

The NTEU is objecting because of that downgrade. I suspect that future revisions to the ACA will re-instate the plan similar to what they have now. Congress will see it's benefits, even though some will cry "socialism". IMO, the single-payer plan is inevitable.

Compromise... another revisionist lying liberal. There wasn't any compromise...in fact the republicans had zero input on the Obamacare legislation and it passed with 100% democrat support. Even given those facts, you pull "it was the republicans fault of some lame ass compromise"...you are as despicable as the POS in the White House. F'n poser/hack.

 Seems I recall the MT suit What am supposed to be in charge making the comment during meeting of congressional members to  some of who disagreed with the PPCA  ..."The election is over and I won." (or something very similar)

Darth Cheney wrote:

RedWhiteBlue wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:Because a DA poster who visits here tol us everyone loves Obamacare and all the great things it has already done and will do...why are these federal employees objecting to share in Obamacare's benefits?

http://washingtonexaminer.com/irs-employee-union-we-dont-want-obamacare/article/2533520?custom_click=rss

Since you value my opinion so much, Darth - I give you my thoughts - - -
I suspect that they are objecting because they like their current plan. Actually, their current plan is nearly exactly the same as what was originally proposed for the PPACA.

We all could have had access to that plan. Unfortunately, the republicans in congress fought it. Consequently, we got the compromise (essentially, the republican plan from the 90's). That is not as good as the plan most federal employees and congress have now, but it is the plan that became law.

The NTEU is objecting because of that downgrade. I suspect that future revisions to the ACA will re-instate the plan similar to what they have now. Congress will see it's benefits, even though some will cry "socialism". IMO, the single-payer plan is inevitable.

Compromise... another revisionist lying liberal. There wasn't any compromise...in fact the republicans had zero input on the Obamacare legislation and it passed with 100% democrat support. Even given those facts, you pull "it was the republicans fault of some lame ass compromise"...you are as despicable as the POS in the White House. F'n poser/hack.

What? "it passed with 100% democrat support." by Darth

WRONG !!!
---- Sure like to see you try and wiggle out of that one Darth.
Here's just a few (just in our area, lots more):
Herseth Sandlin voted NO (SD Dem)
Pomeroy voted NO  (ND Dem)
Peterson voted NO & Walz voted NO  (MN Dems)
Loebsack voted NO (IA Dem)

- - - - - -
Someone's fault? Doesn't apply.
Relevant: You asked why the NTEU objects to it. I gave you my opinion, as to why. What is yours? Do you prefer the plan the IRS/other gov't workers/congress has now? I would have guessed that you thought that current plan is too 'socialistic'. Not?

RedWhiteBlue wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:

RedWhiteBlue wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:Because a DA poster who visits here tol us everyone loves Obamacare and all the great things it has already done and will do...why are these federal employees objecting to share in Obamacare's benefits?

http://washingtonexaminer.com/irs-employee-union-we-dont-want-obamacare/article/2533520?custom_click=rss

Since you value my opinion so much, Darth - I give you my thoughts - - -
I suspect that they are objecting because they like their current plan. Actually, their current plan is nearly exactly the same as what was originally proposed for the PPACA.

We all could have had access to that plan. Unfortunately, the republicans in congress fought it. Consequently, we got the compromise (essentially, the republican plan from the 90's). That is not as good as the plan most federal employees and congress have now, but it is the plan that became law.

The NTEU is objecting because of that downgrade. I suspect that future revisions to the ACA will re-instate the plan similar to what they have now. Congress will see it's benefits, even though some will cry "socialism". IMO, the single-payer plan is inevitable.

Compromise... another revisionist lying liberal. There wasn't any compromise...in fact the republicans had zero input on the Obamacare legislation and it passed with 100% democrat support. Even given those facts, you pull "it was the republicans fault of some lame ass compromise"...you are as despicable as the POS in the White House. F'n poser/hack.

What? "it passed with 100% democrat support." by Darth

WRONG !!!
---- Sure like to see you try and wiggle out of that one Darth.
Here's just a few (just in our area, lots more):
Herseth Sandlin voted NO (SD Dem)
Pomeroy voted NO  (ND Dem)
Peterson voted NO & Walz voted NO  (MN Dems)
Loebsack voted NO (IA Dem)

- - - - - -
Someone's fault? Doesn't apply.
Relevant: You asked why the NTEU objects to it. I gave you my opinion, as to why. What is yours? Do you prefer the plan the IRS/other gov't workers/congress has now? I would have guessed that you thought that current plan is too 'socialistic'. Not?

I do believe that Darth meant that each and every yes vote on BarryCare was provided by the democRATs. IE No R votes.

Skeptical wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:

RedWhiteBlue wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:Because a DA poster who visits here tol us everyone loves Obamacare and all the great things it has already done and will do...why are these federal employees objecting to share in Obamacare's benefits?

http://washingtonexaminer.com/irs-employee-union-we-dont-want-obamacare/article/2533520?custom_click=rss

Since you value my opinion so much, Darth - I give you my thoughts - - -
I suspect that they are objecting because they like their current plan. Actually, their current plan is nearly exactly the same as what was originally proposed for the PPACA.

We all could have had access to that plan. Unfortunately, the republicans in congress fought it. Consequently, we got the compromise (essentially, the republican plan from the 90's). That is not as good as the plan most federal employees and congress have now, but it is the plan that became law.

The NTEU is objecting because of that downgrade. I suspect that future revisions to the ACA will re-instate the plan similar to what they have now. Congress will see it's benefits, even though some will cry "socialism". IMO, the single-payer plan is inevitable.

Compromise... another revisionist lying liberal. There wasn't any compromise...in fact the republicans had zero input on the Obamacare legislation and it passed with 100% democrat support. Even given those facts, you pull "it was the republicans fault of some lame ass compromise"...you are as despicable as the POS in the White House. F'n poser/hack.

 Seems I recall the MT suit What am supposed to be in charge making the comment during meeting of congressional members to  some of who disagreed with the PPCA  ..."The election is over and I won." (or something very similar)

What? You're in America, speak our language.

Liberal wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:

RedWhiteBlue wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:Because a DA poster who visits here tol us everyone loves Obamacare and all the great things it has already done and will do...why are these federal employees objecting to share in Obamacare's benefits?

http://washingtonexaminer.com/irs-employee-union-we-dont-want-obamacare/article/2533520?custom_click=rss

Since you value my opinion so much, Darth - I give you my thoughts - - -
I suspect that they are objecting because they like their current plan. Actually, their current plan is nearly exactly the same as what was originally proposed for the PPACA.

We all could have had access to that plan. Unfortunately, the republicans in congress fought it. Consequently, we got the compromise (essentially, the republican plan from the 90's). That is not as good as the plan most federal employees and congress have now, but it is the plan that became law.

The NTEU is objecting because of that downgrade. I suspect that future revisions to the ACA will re-instate the plan similar to what they have now. Congress will see it's benefits, even though some will cry "socialism". IMO, the single-payer plan is inevitable.

Compromise... another revisionist lying liberal. There wasn't any compromise...in fact the republicans had zero input on the Obamacare legislation and it passed with 100% democrat support. Even given those facts, you pull "it was the republicans fault of some lame ass compromise"...you are as despicable as the POS in the White House. F'n poser/hack.

 Seems I recall the MT suit What am supposed to be in charge making the comment during meeting of congressional members to  some of who disagreed with the PPCA  ..."The election is over and I won." (or something very similar)

What? You're in America, speak our language.

I am feeling sorry for you and providing the video below for you.

Skeptical wrote:Seems I recall the MT suit What am supposed to be in charge making the comment during meeting of congressional members to  some of who disagreed with the PPCA  ..."The election is over and I won." (or something very similar)

This might be easier for you to understand:

Seems I don't recall What am supposed to get of this video if thanks for share though,

Latest "FYI" item.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
Effective Jan 1, 2014, aspirin will be heavily taxed under Obamacare.
The only explanation given was that they are white and they work.
 
No other reason was given, but I thought you'd want to know about it.

Skeptical wrote:Latest "FYI" item.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 
Effective Jan 1, 2014, aspirin will be heavily taxed under Obamacare.
The only explanation given was that they are white and they work.
 
No other reason was given, but I thought you'd want to know about it.

 

Liberal wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:

RedWhiteBlue wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:Because a DA poster who visits here tol us everyone loves Obamacare and all the great things it has already done and will do...why are these federal employees objecting to share in Obamacare's benefits?

http://washingtonexaminer.com/irs-employee-union-we-dont-want-obamacare/article/2533520?custom_click=rss

Since you value my opinion so much, Darth - I g

ive you my thoughts - - -
I suspect that they are objecting because they like their current plan. Actually, their current plan is nearly exactly the same as what was originally proposed for the PPACA.

We all could have had access to that plan. Unfortunately, the republicans in congress fought it. Consequently, we got the compromise (essentially, the republican plan from the 90's). That is not as good as the plan most federal employees and congress have now, but it is the plan that became law.

The NTEU is objecting because of that downgrade. I suspect that future revisions to the ACA will re-instate the plan similar to what they have now. Congress will see it's benefits, even though some will cry "socialism". IMO, the single-payer plan is inevitable.

Compromise... another revisionist lying liberal. There wasn't any compromise...in fact the republicans had zero input on the Obamacare legislation and it passed with 100% democrat support. Even given those facts, you pull "it was the republicans fault of some lame ass compromise"...you are as despicable as the POS in the White House. F'n poser/hack.

 Seems I recall the MT suit What am supposed to be in charge making the comment during meeting of congressional members to  some of who disagreed with the PPCA  ..."The election is over and I won." (or something very similar)

What? You're in America, speak our language.

Keep deflecting jackass, you can't justify the obamination called obamacare so you go orgasmic thinking you really are clever.

FOTWIT