Sanders or the Pope?

Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

Yawn, yet another crappy CNN article. Got a 10/10. The Jesuits in Latin America are believers in Liberation Theology, a twisted exegesis of the Bible and is nothing more than Marxism dressed up in the regalia of the Catholic Church. Reverend Wright, Obama's minister, preached Black Liberation Theology while the Empty Suit sat in the pews for 20 some years and claimed he didn't know what Wright was talking about. Liberation Theology has been condemned by the Vatican as being incompatible with human rights and liberty.

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Matthew 25:31-46

Try reading what it actually says instead of what you want it to say.

Ham Flower? wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Matthew 25:31-46

Try reading what it actually says instead of what you want it to say.

LOL, funny how you take those verses out of context and not include verses 14-30.

Try reading what THAT actually says instead of what you want to say (or include in your post).

BladeRunner wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Matthew 25:31-46

Try reading what it actually says instead of what you want it to say.

LOL, funny how you take those verses out of context and not include verses 14-30.

Try reading what THAT actually says instead of what you want to say (or include in your post).

Yeah, I've read that. I don't think it means what you think it means. Actually, I'm pretty sure it's opposite of what you think.

Ham Flower? wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Matthew 25:31-46

Try reading what it actually says instead of what you want it to say.

Almost forgot to thank you Dr. Jones for your response.

IMHO, 2 Thessalonians 3, especially Verse 10 comes closer to the criteria I suggested .

For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.

Now, please provide the reference to the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for.

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Who supports this?

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Who supports this?

What is...The Democrat Party!

Darth Cheney wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Who supports this?

What is...The Democrat Party!

Who in the Democratic Party supports that?

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Who supports this?

Thanks for your previous response as Ham Flower?

Hey, that falls under the socialism scheme of things so come on ..show us what the Bible dictates about the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for.

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Who supports this?

Thanks for your previous response as Ham Flower?

Hey, that falls under the socialism scheme of things so come on ..show us what the Bible dictates about the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for.

What socialism scheme of things?   Bernie is the only self-described socialist in this country with any sort of relevant following, and he doesn't support that.  So exactly what is it that you are talking about?

Skeptical wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Matthew 25:31-46

Try reading what it actually says instead of what you want it to say.

Almost forgot to thank you Dr. Jones for your response.

IMHO, 2 Thessalonians 3, especially Verse 10 comes closer to the criteria I suggested .

For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.

Now, please provide the reference to the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for.

I just did. Apparently you weren't able to comprehend it.

Skeptical wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Matthew 25:31-46

Try reading what it actually says instead of what you want it to say.

Almost forgot to thank you Dr. Jones for your response.

IMHO, 2 Thessalonians 3, especially Verse 10 comes closer to the criteria I suggested .

For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.

Now, please provide the reference to the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for.

Next you should try reading Matthew 14:13-21. 5,000 people were fed without any mention of work. You really should study your Bible more.

I wonder how many of the "Christians" on this forum even understand what the Parable of the Good Samaritan means?

Ham Flower? wrote:I wonder how many of the "Christians" on this forum even understand what the Parable of the Good Samaritan means?

Well it certainly doesn't mean having the FEDERAL government take care of people who won't provide for themselves with TAXPAYER dollars.

BladeRunner wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Oh my, my, my....  This is a tough one.   That darn bible and all its socialist teachings.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2016/04/us/bernie-sanders-pope-who-said-it/

What are those socialist teachings in the Bible ??? (you know, those specifically saying the able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for)

Matthew 25:31-46

Try reading what it actually says instead of what you want it to say.

LOL, funny how you take those verses out of context and not include verses 14-30.

Try reading what THAT actually says instead of what you want to say (or include in your post).

This reads like a scene from "The Godfather" or "Good Fella's".  Simply paying vigorish to the mob boss.

[quote="Jammer"]

Ham Flower? wrote:I wonder how many of the "Christians" on this forum even understand what the Parable of the Good Samaritan means?

Well it certainly doesn't mean having the FEDERAL government take care of people who won't provide for themselves with TAXPAYER dollars.
[/quote

And it doesn't mean those able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for by others who do work,.

Rather than finding meaning of scripture, is it always more typical for you guys to stew and brood about everything that a passage doesn't mean ?

Shortie's Ex wrote:Rather than finding meaning of scripture, is it always more typical for you guys to stew and brood about everything that a passage doesn't mean ?

What it MEANS is something that hypocritical progressive socialists will never accept.  It means that when people are in need, it is the responsibility of PEOPLE to help them, NOT the government.  

That is what was done in this country and done quite well up until the progressive liberals began fundamentally changing America.  Just in the last 50 years the federal government has spent over $22 trillion dollars on LBJ's WAR ON POVERTY.  That is way more money than we have spent on ALL wars combined.  And what has been the result?  The percentage of people living in poverty has stayed the same since the mid 60's and the total number of people living in poverty has soared.  Nice job assholes.

And if that wasn't bad enough, the division between the very rich and the very poor has never been greater.  But what should we expect when LIBERAL programs and policies prevent people from working - YES PREVENTS.  If a person earns too much, they will lose their free democrat handouts.  

And then the progressive liberals DEMEAN the stock market ridiculing the lower middle class into NOT investing their modest savings thus preventing them from enjoying the prosperity that many Americans have enjoyed as a result of the benefits of personal investing.

Skeptical wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:I wonder how many of the "Christians" on this forum even understand what the Parable of the Good Samaritan means?

Well it certainly doesn't mean having the FEDERAL government take care of people who won't provide for themselves with TAXPAYER dollars.

And it doesn't mean those able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for by others who do work,.

[/quote]
You asked for a verse and I gave you one. Read your Bible, all of this stuff is in there.

Shortie's Ex wrote:Rather than finding meaning of scripture, is it always more typical for you guys to stew and brood about everything that a passage doesn't mean ?

That's funny, isn't it. The teachings of Jesus are pretty simple and straight forward, yet Christians spend more time interpreting them to their own convenient needs than actually trying to follow them.

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:Rather than finding meaning of scripture, is it always more typical for you guys to stew and brood about everything that a passage doesn't mean ?

What it MEANS is something that hypocritical progressive socialists will never accept.  It means that when people are in need, it is the responsibility of PEOPLE to help them, NOT the government.  

That is what was done in this country and done quite well up until the progressive liberals began fundamentally changing America.  Just in the last 50 years the federal government has spent over $22 trillion dollars on LBJ's WAR ON POVERTY.  That is way more money than we have spent on ALL wars combined.  And what has been the result?  The percentage of people living in poverty has stayed the same since the mid 60's and the total number of people living in poverty has soared.  Nice job assholes.

And if that wasn't bad enough, the division between the very rich and the very poor has never been greater.  But what should we expect when LIBERAL programs and policies prevent people from working - YES PREVENTS.  If a person earns too much, they will lose their free democrat handouts.  

And then the progressive liberals DEMEAN the stock market ridiculing the lower middle class into NOT investing their modest savings thus preventing them from enjoying the prosperity that many Americans have enjoyed as a result of the benefits of personal investing.

  Progressive liberals are evil cretins.    

The government is the people.

Skeptical wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:I wonder how many of the "Christians" on this forum even understand what the Parable of the Good Samaritan means?

Well it certainly doesn't mean having the FEDERAL government take care of people who won't provide for themselves with TAXPAYER dollars.
[/quote

And it doesn't mean those able bodied lazy who refuse to work have a right to be provided for by others who do work,.

Who says it does?  You keep your straw man on a short leash, don't you.

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:Rather than finding meaning of scripture, is it always more typical for you guys to stew and brood about everything that a passage doesn't mean ?

What it MEANS is something that hypocritical progressive socialists will never accept.  It means that when people are in need, it is the responsibility of PEOPLE to help them, NOT the government.  

That is what was done in this country and done quite well up until the progressive liberals began fundamentally changing America.  Just in the last 50 years the federal government has spent over $22 trillion dollars on LBJ's WAR ON POVERTY.  That is way more money than we have spent on ALL wars combined.  And what has been the result?  The percentage of people living in poverty has stayed the same since the mid 60's and the total number of people living in poverty has soared.  Nice job assholes.

And if that wasn't bad enough, the division between the very rich and the very poor has never been greater.  But what should we expect when LIBERAL programs and policies prevent people from working - YES PREVENTS.  If a person earns too much, they will lose their free democrat handouts.  

And then the progressive liberals DEMEAN the stock market ridiculing the lower middle class into NOT investing their modest savings thus preventing them from enjoying the prosperity that many Americans have enjoyed as a result of the benefits of personal investing.

  Progressive liberals are evil cretins.    

The government is the people.

There you have it...the delusional thought process that has created the mess we now face. You have to be the most misinformed person I have ever experienced.