No Cruz Endorsement for the Donald

Thank you.

Cruz in 2020.

Crikers! Jonah Hill is Eric Trump's doppelganger. Only with better teeth.

Tom Brokaw is stumbling over his words, foaming at the corners of his mouth and suffering from some type of apoplectic fit that Cruz didn't endorse Trump in his convention speech. He's even waving around the stupid pledge that Cruz did sign but Trump rescinded back in March. What a hoot!

Cruz 2020

Jeebus, Mike Pence must be close to setting some kind of record for dragging out an acceptance speech.

Fcuk can't somebody shut up Nicole Wallace? Every Liberal's go to Girl for a Conservative Voice, but gawd almighty she is totally brainless/clueless. Why anybody pays her money for her commentary is beyond me.

He did give a good acceptance speech a person might after being selected as a Presidential candidate of the party.  Only thing .. he was not the person selected as the nominee of the party!  So, is there anybody actually thinking Cruz would endorse anybody but ....................himself?

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Thank you.

Cruz in 2020.

Oh Gomezz I think it more likely to be Trump Jr 2024. After Hillary !

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Thank you.

Cruz in 2020.

Oh Gomezz I think it more likely to be Trump Jr 2024.  After Hillary !

If elected, Hillary will do her best Jimmy Carter imitation. She'll make history by being the first President not having a security clearance.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Thank you.

Cruz in 2020.

He's gonna be the Tommy Tippy doll of the Rep party. He'll be the most over used political joke in history.

#1 Ted Cruz can have his day in the sun making his little statement,  but his shiit is just as weak as Trump'supporters.

#2 If he's so concerned about people attacking his wife then he belongs to the wrong party, and more importantly needs to start by reconsidering his own stance on a woman's reproductive rights.

I never heard the speech at all but CNN'S Jake Tapper sure gave it high marks. Must not have been bad.

Cruz booed for not endorsing Trump
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/07/21/rnc-convention-ted-cruz-booed.cnn

Dr. Jones wrote:I never heard the speech at all but CNN'S Jake Tapper sure gave it high marks.  Must not have been bad.

Cruz booed for not endorsing Trump
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/07/21/rnc-convention-ted-cruz-booed.cnn

That's old news.

It might be interesting for people to restudy the history of Rome.

http://www.ancient.eu/Roman_Republic/

There are some very interesting data points such as:
* Once a Republic was established, Rome became incredibly powerful and prosperous
* The Republic thrived for several centuries
*  The foundation for their empire was religion and family
* Rome was a refuge for those seeking a better life
* As time went on, the Senate (Congress) lost much of its authority
* Problems developed including:
.   - Fighting many wars
.   - Spending problems
.   - Class warfare between the haves and have nots
.   - Immigration issues
.   - Demands to grant citizenship to EVERYONE
* Tyrannical emperors emerged

The end of Rome, the end of the story.  Some of this seems like it happened just yesterday, not 2000 years ago.

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:I never heard the speech at all but CNN'S Jake Tapper sure gave it high marks.  Must not have been bad.

Cruz booed for not endorsing Trump
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/07/21/rnc-convention-ted-cruz-booed.cnn

That's old news.

That CNN anchors are fair and balanced?

Dr. Jones wrote:

That CNN anchors are fair and balanced?

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

That CNN anchors are fair and balanced?

                     

Not really sure what you're getting at then.

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

That CNN anchors are fair and balanced?

                     

Not really sure what you're getting at then.

DUH, it is old news that anything remotely anti Trump would be given high marks by CNN