Re: There is no difference between a democrat and a socialist

Skeptical Sun Aug 09, 2015 12:31 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:Obamacare carries a $10,000 deductible on the lower end policies essentially making the "insurance" worthless in all but the rarest of circumstances. High cost plus high deductible and liberals think they have achieved utopia. Granted, half of the societal slugs won't have to pay any premiums but they are receiving zero coverage until that $ 10k deductible is met. Math is hard for stupid people.

Bullshit. You need to adjust your spam filter on your email. Or stop watching Faux News.

http://www.healthpocket.com/individual-health-insurance/bronze-health-plans#.VcdQs58o7qA

See Garfield, that's how that works. I didn't believe his BS statement so I found a source to debunk it. Watch and learn.

What did you debunk?

An individual Bronze policy is $6600 deductible. Not $10000. It's also cost shared 60/40 until the deductible is met. Not "off the top" as he suggests. Pretty standard policy.

Right here you fukcing dolt.

You do realize BEGINNING usually means the point in time or space at which something starts, don't you? In this case you did not mention 60/40 in your so called debunk BEGINNING post.

Darth did not mention the 60/40 and you did not address it in your BEGINNING post in rebuttal you lying SOS. You only mentioned it later on.

Dr. Evil Sun Aug 09, 2015 12:36 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:Obamacare carries a $10,000 deductible on the lower end policies essentially making the "insurance" worthless in all but the rarest of circumstances. High cost plus high deductible and liberals think they have achieved utopia. Granted, half of the societal slugs won't have to pay any premiums but they are receiving zero coverage until that $ 10k deductible is met. Math is hard for stupid people.

Bullshit. You need to adjust your spam filter on your email. Or stop watching Faux News.

http://www.healthpocket.com/individual-health-insurance/bronze-health-plans#.VcdQs58o7qA

See Garfield, that's how that works. I didn't believe his BS statement so I found a source to debunk it. Watch and learn.

What did you debunk?

An individual Bronze policy is $6600 deductible. Not $10000. It's also cost shared 60/40 until the deductible is met. Not "off the top" as he suggests. Pretty standard policy.

Right here you fukcing dolt.

You do realize BEGINNING usually means the point in time or space at which something starts, don't you? In this case you did not mention 60/40 in your so called debunk BEGINNING post.

Darth did not mention the 60/40 and you did not address it in your BEGINNING post in rebuttal you lying SOS. You only mentioned it later on.

Don't waste my time you fukcing idiot.

Skeptical Sun Aug 09, 2015 12:48 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:Obamacare carries a $10,000 deductible on the lower end policies essentially making the "insurance" worthless in all but the rarest of circumstances. High cost plus high deductible and liberals think they have achieved utopia. Granted, half of the societal slugs won't have to pay any premiums but they are receiving zero coverage until that $ 10k deductible is met. Math is hard for stupid people.

Bullshit. You need to adjust your spam filter on your email. Or stop watching Faux News.

http://www.healthpocket.com/individual-health-insurance/bronze-health-plans#.VcdQs58o7qA

See Garfield, that's how that works. I didn't believe his BS statement so I found a source to debunk it. Watch and learn.

What did you debunk?

An individual Bronze policy is $6600 deductible. Not $10000. It's also cost shared 60/40 until the deductible is met. Not "off the top" as he suggests. Pretty standard policy.

Right here you fukcing dolt.

You do realize BEGINNING usually means the point in time or space at which something starts, don't you? In this case you did not mention 60/40 in your so called debunk BEGINNING post.

Darth did not mention the 60/40 and you did not address it in your BEGINNING post in rebuttal you lying SOS. You only mentioned it later on.

Don't waste my time you fukcing idiot.

You forgot to answer, "Why do you think it is the responsibility of others to provide for you?"

BTW, your response is typical for a lying ass progressive liberal when wrong.

Dr. Evil Sun Aug 09, 2015 12:56 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:Obamacare carries a $10,000 deductible on the lower end policies essentially making the "insurance" worthless in all but the rarest of circumstances. High cost plus high deductible and liberals think they have achieved utopia. Granted, half of the societal slugs won't have to pay any premiums but they are receiving zero coverage until that $ 10k deductible is met. Math is hard for stupid people.

Bullshit. You need to adjust your spam filter on your email. Or stop watching Faux News.

http://www.healthpocket.com/individual-health-insurance/bronze-health-plans#.VcdQs58o7qA

See Garfield, that's how that works. I didn't believe his BS statement so I found a source to debunk it. Watch and learn.

What did you debunk?

An individual Bronze policy is $6600 deductible. Not $10000. It's also cost shared 60/40 until the deductible is met. Not "off the top" as he suggests. Pretty standard policy.

Right here you fukcing dolt.

You do realize BEGINNING usually means the point in time or space at which something starts, don't you? In this case you did not mention 60/40 in your so called debunk BEGINNING post.

Darth did not mention the 60/40 and you did not address it in your BEGINNING post in rebuttal you lying SOS. You only mentioned it later on.

Don't waste my time you fukcing idiot.

Your response is typical for a lying ass progressive liberal when wrong.

Wrong about what? Supply proof.

Skeptical Sun Aug 09, 2015 12:58 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:Obamacare carries a $10,000 deductible on the lower end policies essentially making the "insurance" worthless in all but the rarest of circumstances. High cost plus high deductible and liberals think they have achieved utopia. Granted, half of the societal slugs won't have to pay any premiums but they are receiving zero coverage until that $ 10k deductible is met. Math is hard for stupid people.

Bullshit. You need to adjust your spam filter on your email. Or stop watching Faux News.

http://www.healthpocket.com/individual-health-insurance/bronze-health-plans#.VcdQs58o7qA

See Garfield, that's how that works. I didn't believe his BS statement so I found a source to debunk it. Watch and learn.

What did you debunk?

An individual Bronze policy is $6600 deductible. Not $10000. It's also cost shared 60/40 until the deductible is met. Not "off the top" as he suggests. Pretty standard policy.

Right here you fukcing dolt.

You do realize BEGINNING usually means the point in time or space at which something starts, don't you? In this case you did not mention 60/40 in your so called debunk BEGINNING post.

Darth did not mention the 60/40 and you did not address it in your BEGINNING post in rebuttal you lying SOS. You only mentioned it later on.

Don't waste my time you fukcing idiot.

Your response is typical for a lying ass progressive liberal when wrong.

Wrong about what? Supply proof.

Why do you think it is the responsibility of others to provide for you?

Jammer Sun Aug 09, 2015 12:58 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:Obamacare carries a $10,000 deductible on the lower end policies essentially making the "insurance" worthless in all but the rarest of circumstances. High cost plus high deductible and liberals think they have achieved utopia. Granted, half of the societal slugs won't have to pay any premiums but they are receiving zero coverage until that $ 10k deductible is met. Math is hard for stupid people.

Bullshit. You need to adjust your spam filter on your email. Or stop watching Faux News.

http://www.healthpocket.com/individual-health-insurance/bronze-health-plans#.VcdQs58o7qA

See Garfield, that's how that works. I didn't believe his BS statement so I found a source to debunk it. Watch and learn.

What did you debunk?

An individual Bronze policy is $6600 deductible. Not $10000. It's also cost shared 60/40 until the deductible is met. Not "off the top" as he suggests. Pretty standard policy.

Right here you fukcing dolt.

You do realize BEGINNING usually means the point in time or space at which something starts, don't you? In this case you did not mention 60/40 in your so called debunk BEGINNING post.

Darth did not mention the 60/40 and you did not address it in your BEGINNING post in rebuttal you lying SOS. You only mentioned it later on.

Skeptical, ole buddy, don’t let this lying piece of dogshit hoodwink you. I went and looked at his stupid link and he is totally misrepresenting the plan on how it works. Just like he tried to insinuate that the Founders believed in socialism, he is pulling the same crap here.

So double check everything before you think you are wrong. It is the lying sack of dogshit that is wrong, but many on here are not surprised.

Jammer Sun Aug 09, 2015 1:01 pm

Has anyone else noticed that this jackoff jones guy besides being a pathological liar seems to have a real violent streak in him and has some serious anger management issues?

Dr. Evil Sun Aug 09, 2015 1:29 pm

Jammer wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:Obamacare carries a $10,000 deductible on the lower end policies essentially making the "insurance" worthless in all but the rarest of circumstances. High cost plus high deductible and liberals think they have achieved utopia. Granted, half of the societal slugs won't have to pay any premiums but they are receiving zero coverage until that $ 10k deductible is met. Math is hard for stupid people.

Bullshit. You need to adjust your spam filter on your email. Or stop watching Faux News.

http://www.healthpocket.com/individual-health-insurance/bronze-health-plans#.VcdQs58o7qA

See Garfield, that's how that works. I didn't believe his BS statement so I found a source to debunk it. Watch and learn.

What did you debunk?

An individual Bronze policy is $6600 deductible. Not $10000. It's also cost shared 60/40 until the deductible is met. Not "off the top" as he suggests. Pretty standard policy.

Right here you fukcing dolt.

You do realize BEGINNING usually means the point in time or space at which something starts, don't you? In this case you did not mention 60/40 in your so called debunk BEGINNING post.

Darth did not mention the 60/40 and you did not address it in your BEGINNING post in rebuttal you lying SOS. You only mentioned it later on.

Skeptical, ole buddy, don’t let this lying piece of dogshit hoodwink you. I went and looked at his stupid link and he is totally misrepresenting the plan on how it works. Just like he tried to insinuate that the Founders believed in socialism, he is pulling the same crap here.

So double check everything before you think you are wrong. It is the lying sack of dogshit that is wrong, but many on here are not surprised.

You going to cite some examples it just keep running your mouth?

Dr. Evil Sun Aug 09, 2015 1:31 pm

Jammer wrote:Has anyone else noticed that this jackoff jones guy besides being a pathological liar seems to have a real violent streak in him and has some serious anger management issues?

Anger issues?!?!? From a guy that breathes fire and brimstone with every post???? lol!

Dr. Evil Sun Aug 09, 2015 2:03 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:Obamacare carries a $10,000 deductible on the lower end policies essentially making the "insurance" worthless in all but the rarest of circumstances. High cost plus high deductible and liberals think they have achieved utopia. Granted, half of the societal slugs won't have to pay any premiums but they are receiving zero coverage until that $ 10k deductible is met. Math is hard for stupid people.

Bullshit. You need to adjust your spam filter on your email. Or stop watching Faux News.

http://www.healthpocket.com/individual-health-insurance/bronze-health-plans#.VcdQs58o7qA

See Garfield, that's how that works. I didn't believe his BS statement so I found a source to debunk it. Watch and learn.

What did you debunk?

An individual Bronze policy is $6600 deductible. Not $10000. It's also cost shared 60/40 until the deductible is met. Not "off the top" as he suggests. Pretty standard policy.

Right here you fukcing dolt.

You do realize BEGINNING usually means the point in time or space at which something starts, don't you? In this case you did not mention 60/40 in your so called debunk BEGINNING post.

Darth did not mention the 60/40 and you did not address it in your BEGINNING post in rebuttal you lying SOS. You only mentioned it later on.

Don't waste my time you fukcing idiot.

Your response is typical for a lying ass progressive liberal when wrong.

Wrong about what? Supply proof.

Why do you think it is the responsibility of others to provide for you?

If I were a worthless POS I would jack you around for moving the goal posts, or some other deterrent freak show. But I have more integrity than that, so I will simply answer your question.

I don't expect others to provide for me. Not by a long shot. Like our forefathers I expect a man to be compensated fairly and proportionally for a days work in furthering his bosses business. Productivity is great. Businesses are making money. And yet wages are stagnant. This is precisely what this great country's founders warned us about. I don't mind paying for my necessities either, such as healthcare, but would much rather pay a non-profit than a for profit price gouger.

Gomezz Adddams Sun Aug 09, 2015 2:41 pm

Wow. For a Pulitzer Prize recipient, David Cay Johnston takes quite a bit of liberty in his use of the Jefferson, Adams, Hamilton and Madison quotes. His removing the quotes from their historical context only serves to reveal how weak his original premise is. Also his recounting of the history behind the 1792 cod fishing bill and it's ramifications are tortured beyond reason.

1) The fishing and whaling industry's use of sharesmen in the 1700 and 1800s was common place. Nothing new here

2) The use of the subsidy was actually a diversion of a drawback in a salt tariff on imported salt used to cure the cod and was originally paid to merchants engaged in exporting cod. Note that interference in free trade with a tariff creates unintended consequences by increasing costs of production and in effect transfers the salt tariff to an export (it's bad economic policy to place tariffs on your exports). In reality the tariff should have been completely dropped however this would have run counter to Hamilton's mercantilist National School economic philosphy.

3) This is hardly what could be called Socialism. It is however Mercantilist, which is not surprising since that was the guiding economic principle of Hamilton and the US up until the 1930s when it was replaced by FDR socialism.

4) In light of the author's extravagant use of Founder's quotes (in particular Madison) to bolster his argument, he fails to mention that Madison argued against the 1792 bill in the House of Representatives. Madsion argues that this bille exceeds the powers of Congress.

Jammer Sun Aug 09, 2015 2:44 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:Obamacare carries a $10,000 deductible on the lower end policies essentially making the "insurance" worthless in all but the rarest of circumstances. High cost plus high deductible and liberals think they have achieved utopia. Granted, half of the societal slugs won't have to pay any premiums but they are receiving zero coverage until that $ 10k deductible is met. Math is hard for stupid people.

Bullshit. You need to adjust your spam filter on your email. Or stop watching Faux News.

http://www.healthpocket.com/individual-health-insurance/bronze-health-plans#.VcdQs58o7qA

See Garfield, that's how that works. I didn't believe his BS statement so I found a source to debunk it. Watch and learn.

What did you debunk?

An individual Bronze policy is $6600 deductible. Not $10000. It's also cost shared 60/40 until the deductible is met. Not "off the top" as he suggests. Pretty standard policy.

Right here you fukcing dolt.

You do realize BEGINNING usually means the point in time or space at which something starts, don't you? In this case you did not mention 60/40 in your so called debunk BEGINNING post.

Darth did not mention the 60/40 and you did not address it in your BEGINNING post in rebuttal you lying SOS. You only mentioned it later on.

Don't waste my time you fukcing idiot.

Your response is typical for a lying ass progressive liberal when wrong.

Wrong about what? Supply proof.

Why do you think it is the responsibility of others to provide for you?

If I were a worthless POS I would jack you around for moving the goal posts, or some other deterrent freak show. But I have more integrity than that, so I will simply answer your question.

I don't expect others to provide for me. Not by a long shot. Like our forefathers I expect a man to be compensated fairly and proportionally for a days work in furthering his bosses business. Productivity is great. Businesses are making money. And yet wages are stagnant. This is precisely what this great country's founders warned us about. I don't mind paying for my necessities either, such as healthcare, but would much rather pay a non-profit than a for profit price gouger.

What a lying sack of dogshit. Will the lying ever stop? Dumb question, I am sorry we know the answer on that one.

And then get this, the dumbass would sooner pay a non-profit. The sack of dogshit doesn’t even realize that these non-profit hospitals make as much if not more profit, they just don’t pay taxes – ANY TAXES. They are just one more liberal off shoot of crony capitalism brought to us by bleeding heart liberals.

Consider how much money Sanford has spent building non healthcare facilities not just in Sioux Falls but around the country. Plus all of the money they have spent on needless self promotion advertising and very expensive naming rights. And if that isn’t enough, take a look at the IRS reports and count all the zeros. Also recognize that they have multiple entities. That makes one hell of a lot of zeros to add up. Non-profit, yeah only in the mind of a dumbass liberal.

http://990finder.foundationcenter.org/990results.aspx?990_type=&fn=sanford&st=SD&zp=&ei=&fy=&action=Find

And then did you see that the lying sack of dogshit tried to insinuate that the Founding Fathers warned us about stagnant wages. WRONG again jackoff. It was just the opposite, they warned us about the dangers of government welfare programs creating an entire class of lazy deadbeats like jackoff jones who will always whine for more free stuff under some false pretense. These people would be pathetic if they weren't so evil.

BTW, did you notice that the liberal loon seems even more angry today than normal. Not a good day to be on the road if he is.

Darth Cheney Sun Aug 09, 2015 2:49 pm

If I were a worthless POS I would jack you around for moving the goal posts, or some other deterrent freak show. Don't sell yourself short...you are a POS

But I have more integrity than that, so I will simply answer your question. You are utterly devoid of integrity.

Like our forefathers I expect a man to be compensated fairly and proportionally for a days work in furthering his bosses business. Where do they talk about being fairly compensated? You are confusing Marx's writings with the Founding Father's.

Businesses are making money. The vast majority of business's fail...business's don't make money because you say so.

And yet wages are stagnant. Because we have a Marxist in the White House who is issuing 100's of crippling Executive Orders daily

This is precisely what this great country's founders warned us about. They warned us about Socialism/Communism, the very thing you hold as the answer.

I don't mind paying for my necessities either, such as healthcare, but would much rather pay a non-profit than a for profit price gouger. Avera is non-profit...you would think they would have an easy time competing against Sanford....

Jammer Sun Aug 09, 2015 2:53 pm

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Wow. For a Pulitzer Prize recipient, David Cay Johnston takes quite a bit of liberty in his use of the Jefferson, Adams, Hamilton and Madison quotes. His removing the quotes from their historical context only serves to reveal how weak his original premise is. Also his recounting of the history behind the 1792 cod fishing bill and it's ramifications are tortured beyond reason.

1) The fishing and whaling industry's use of sharesmen in the 1700 and 1800s was common place. Nothing new here

2) The use of the subsidy was actually a diversion of a drawback in a salt tariff on imported salt used to cure the cod and was paid to merchants engaged in exporting cod. Note that interference in free trade with a tariff creates unintended consequences by increasing costs of production and in effect transfers the salt tariff to an export (it's bad economic policy to place tariffs on your exports). In reality the tariff should have been completely dropped however this would have run counter to Hamilton's mercantilist National School economic philosphy.

3) This is hardly what could be called Socialism. It is however Mercantilist, which is not surprising since that was the guiding economic principle of Hamilton and the US up until the 1930s when it was replaced by FDR socialism.

4) In light of the author's extravagant use of Founder's quotes (in particular Madison) to bolster his argument, he fails to mention that Madison argued against the 1792 bill in the House of Representatives. Madsion argues that this bille exceeds the powers of Congress.

Profit sharing is essentially a bonus/commission for performance but on a group wide basis rather than an individual basis. It has ZERO to do with socialism. The liberal lie has no legs whatsoever beyond that simple fact. Lying liberals will fabricate whatever they can think of to sell their evil agenda.

Skeptical Sun Aug 09, 2015 2:55 pm

Jammer wrote: BTW, did you notice that the liberal loon seems even more angry today than normal. Not a good day to be on the road if he is.

I think he is still shaking in his boots after saying this to you earlier

I would love to see you try. You better be ready to bring it...

Jammer Sun Aug 09, 2015 2:56 pm

Here you go jackoff:

http://works.bepress.com/george_nation/1/

Not everybody agrees with you on nonprofits. You are a worthless piece of dogshit.

Jammer Sun Aug 09, 2015 2:58 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Jammer wrote: BTW, did you notice that the liberal loon seems even more angry today than normal. Not a good day to be on the road if he is.

I think he is still shaking in his boots after saying this to you earlier
I would love to see you try. You better be ready to bring it...

He is at the bottom of the barrel of evil liberals and I am not sure if he is worth wasting spit on.

I think the shaking in his boots that you witnessed was him trying to get the turd to drop out of his underwear when he shite his pants.

Jammer Sun Aug 09, 2015 3:33 pm

Jackoof's article wrote:The founders, despite decades of rancorous disagreements about almost every other aspect of their grand experiment, agreed that America would survive and thrive only if there was widespread ownership of land and businesses.

Think about the situation we have today. Many Americans do not own land or businesses, but why. The single biggest reason is the progressive liberal welfare system. If the lazy deadbeats actually owned something and worked for a living, they would not qualify for the FREE stuff. And yes it is threatening America’s survival as these deadbeats have learned how to VOTE themselves more money from the US TREASURY.

Again from the article wrote:The second president, John Adams, feared "monopolies of land" would destroy the nation

And just who is the biggest land owner in America? The FEDERAL GOVERNEMNT And once again thanks to progressive liberal policies which changed how our country dealt with new states admitted to the Union. Take a look at the western states that were added later under progressive liberal policies. This land is neither in private hands and on the tax rolls nor is it owned by the states.

There is no difference between a democrat and a socialist - Page 5 Ytiuiozqsdvzwa7yja1n

There is no difference between a democrat and a socialist - Page 5 Ytiuiozqsdvzwa7yja1n

Dr. Evil Sun Aug 09, 2015 5:16 pm

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Wow. For a Pulitzer Prize recipient, David Cay Johnston takes quite a bit of liberty in his use of the Jefferson, Adams, Hamilton and Madison quotes. His removing the quotes from their historical context only serves to reveal how weak his original premise is. Also his recounting of the history behind the 1792 cod fishing bill and it's ramifications are tortured beyond reason.

Really?

1) The fishing and whaling industry's use of sharesmen in the 1700 and 1800s was common place. Nothing new here

And yet it shows the sentiment of the time.

2) The use of the subsidy was actually a diversion of a drawback in a salt tariff on imported salt used to cure the cod and was originally paid to merchants engaged in exporting cod. Note that interference in free trade with a tariff creates unintended consequences by increasing costs of production and in effect transfers the salt tariff to an export (it's bad economic policy to place tariffs on your exports). In reality the tariff should have been completely dropped however this would have run counter to Hamilton's mercantilist National School economic philosphy.

3) This is hardly what could be called Socialism. It is however Mercantilist, which is not surprising since that was the guiding economic principle of Hamilton and the US up until the 1930s when it was replaced by FDR socialism.

Although I don't disagree with the Mercantilistic sentiment that only accounts for the government guided conserted efforts to promote exports for the colonies. However that doesn't account for the concern for equality expressed by many of our leaders of the time. One thing is for certain. They did not practice the type of laissez faire Capitalism touted by modern day Conservatives.

4) In light of the author's extravagant use of Founder's quotes (in particular Madison) to bolster his argument, he fails to mention that Madison argued against the 1792 bill in the House of Representatives. Madsion argues that this bille exceeds the powers of Congress.

Which bill is that?

Dr. Evil Sun Aug 09, 2015 5:19 pm

Jammer wrote:
Jackoof's article wrote:The founders, despite decades of rancorous disagreements about almost every other aspect of their grand experiment, agreed that America would survive and thrive only if there was widespread ownership of land and businesses.

Think about the situation we have today. Many Americans do not own land or businesses, but why. The single biggest reason is the progressive liberal welfare system. If the lazy deadbeats actually owned something and worked for a living, they would not qualify for the FREE stuff. And yes it is threatening America’s survival as these deadbeats have learned how to VOTE themselves more money from the US TREASURY.

Again from the article wrote:The second president, John Adams, feared "monopolies of land" would destroy the nation

And just who is the biggest land owner in America? The FEDERAL GOVERNEMNT And once again thanks to progressive liberal policies which changed how our country dealt with new states admitted to the Union. Take a look at the western states that were added later under progressive liberal policies. This land is neither in private hands and on the tax rolls nor is it owned by the states.

Ever heard of a topographical map? It may be worth your time to look at one of the US.

There is no difference between a democrat and a socialist - Page 5 2146437292

There is no difference between a democrat and a socialist - Page 5 2146437292

ALERT: Autocorrect error has been detected. ALERT: Incident has been isolated and corrected, wait for the all clear to renter post so as not to hurt your precious little eyes and GET A LIFE!!! That is all..

Skeptical Sun Aug 09, 2015 5:32 pm

Dr. Jones wrote: Ever heard of a typographical map? It may be worth your time to look at one of the US.

Is that anything like the everyday typographical error??

Dr. Evil Sun Aug 09, 2015 5:33 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote: Ever heard of a typographical map? It may be worth your time to look at one of the US.

Is that anything like the everyday typographical error??

Sure is.

Jammer Sun Aug 09, 2015 5:36 pm

Jackoff Jones wrote:Ever heard of a typographical map? It may be worth your time to look at one of the US.

No dick head, I have not heard of a typographical map. But I do know that almost every western state is very anxious to claim the land that rightfully belongs to them. It is unconstitutional for the federal government to keep this land.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/18104-western-states-want-feds-to-surrender-federal-land

Skeptical Sun Aug 09, 2015 5:39 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote: Ever heard of a typographical map? It may be worth your time to look at one of the US.

Is that anything like the everyday typographical error??

Sure is.

Please link to a typographical map so the forum readers may look at a typographical map.

Dr. Evil Sun Aug 09, 2015 5:42 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote: Ever heard of a typographical map? It may be worth your time to look at one of the US.

Is that anything like the everyday typographical error??

Sure is.

Please link to a typographical map so the forum readers may look at a typographical map.

Do you ever plan on having a rational thought or are you just going to keep pouncing on these stupid little nuances?

Sponsored content