Re: What your neighbors may not know, but maybe should:

Skeptical Sat Feb 06, 2016 9:05 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:Here's a few interesting facts for those of you who are interested in the truth. Straight from the farm subsidy whistle blowers themselves. From '95-'12:

62% of farmers received no subsidies what so ever. Zero. None. Zilch.

Of the 38% that actually recieved subsidies, 80% averaged less than $600 a year.

How's that for livin' high on the government hog?!?

Sorry if that doesn't fit your "government teat" rhetoric.

http://farm.ewg.org/region.php?fips=00000

When you look at South Dakota data your claims don't hold true.

26 percent of farms in South Dakota did not collect subsidy payments - according to USDA

Which indicates 74 percent of farms in South Dakota DID collect subsidy payments.

Dr. Evil Sat Feb 06, 2016 9:15 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Here's a few interesting facts for those of you who are interested in the truth. Straight from the farm subsidy whistle blowers themselves. From '95-'12:

62% of farmers received no subsidies what so ever. Zero. None. Zilch.

Of the 38% that actually recieved subsidies, 80% averaged less than $600 a year.

How's that for livin' high on the government hog?!?

Sorry if that doesn't fit your "government teat" rhetoric.

http://farm.ewg.org/region.php?fips=00000

When you look at South Dakota data your claims don't hold true.

26 percent of farms in South Dakota did not collect subsidy payments - according to USDA

Which indicates 74 percent of farms in South Dakota DID collect subsidy payments.

80% of which receiving less than $1400 a year on average.
Which means a whopping 15% received a negligible amount of money. affraid

Skeptical Sat Feb 06, 2016 9:31 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Here's a few interesting facts for those of you who are interested in the truth. Straight from the farm subsidy whistle blowers themselves. From '95-'12:

62% of farmers received no subsidies what so ever. Zero. None. Zilch.

Of the 38% that actually recieved subsidies, 80% averaged less than $600 a year.

How's that for livin' high on the government hog?!?

Sorry if that doesn't fit your "government teat" rhetoric.

http://farm.ewg.org/region.php?fips=00000

When you look at South Dakota data your claims don't hold true.

26 percent of farms in South Dakota did not collect subsidy payments - according to USDA

Which indicates 74 percent of farms in South Dakota DID collect subsidy payments.
80% of which receiving less than $1400 a year on average.
Which means a whopping 15% received a negligible amount of money.

So that is why you ditched the farm and went on full time welfare ... you get more from the taxpayers this way !! bounce

Dr. Evil Sat Feb 06, 2016 9:36 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Here's a few interesting facts for those of you who are interested in the truth. Straight from the farm subsidy whistle blowers themselves. From '95-'12:

62% of farmers received no subsidies what so ever. Zero. None. Zilch.

Of the 38% that actually recieved subsidies, 80% averaged less than $600 a year.

How's that for livin' high on the government hog?!?

Sorry if that doesn't fit your "government teat" rhetoric.

http://farm.ewg.org/region.php?fips=00000

When you look at South Dakota data your claims don't hold true.

26 percent of farms in South Dakota did not collect subsidy payments - according to USDA

Which indicates 74 percent of farms in South Dakota DID collect subsidy payments.
80% of which receiving less than $1400 a year on average.
Which means a whopping 15% received a negligible amount of money.

So that is why you ditched the farm and went on full time welfare ... you get more from the taxpayers this way !!

???

Jammer Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:08 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Here's a few interesting facts for those of you who are interested in the truth. Straight from the farm subsidy whistle blowers themselves. From '95-'12:

62% of farmers received no subsidies what so ever. Zero. None. Zilch.

Of the 38% that actually recieved subsidies, 80% averaged less than $600 a year.

How's that for livin' high on the government hog?!?

Sorry if that doesn't fit your "government teat" rhetoric.

http://farm.ewg.org/region.php?fips=00000

When you look at South Dakota data your claims don't hold true.

26 percent of farms in South Dakota did not collect subsidy payments - according to USDA

Which indicates 74 percent of farms in South Dakota DID collect subsidy payments.
80% of which receiving less than $1400 a year on average.
Which means a whopping 15% received a negligible amount of money.

So that is why you ditched the farm and went on full time welfare ... you get more from the taxpayers this way !!

I think you misunderstood Jackoff Jones. What he is saying is that whenever democrats create a policy or program to benefit somebody they always TAKE CARE OF THE BIG BOYS. Whether it is banks(Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, etc.) or farmers, they screw the little guy and benefit the big boys who heavily donate to their campaigns.

What is a little difficult to understand is how any of these little guys who might be getting $1400 or even less be such complete idiots to support these corrupt progressive liberals. I guess it just explains how they got their name of USEFUL IDIOTS.

Darth Cheney Sun Feb 07, 2016 7:24 am

Dr. Jones wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Darth Cheney wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote: What's your point? There's plenty of working poor in this country.

Just curious, please tell how you define "poor".

An example:

Anyone who has to choose between feeding their children and purchasing healthcare.

And these same people surely don't smoke, drink, do drugs, gamble, etc....correct?

Healthcare is free you idiot it is called Obamacare remember?

Show me a single example of anyone who was denied healthcare in this nation in the last 40 years...anyone. Nobody has ever been denied healthcare only they have been expected to pay for the services afterwards according to their ability. That is what liberals fear...actual accountability.

You're an idiot.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100840148

Now we are getting down to the brass tacks...you don't think people should have to pay for their medical care. How about if we include farmers in that mix...I don't think people should have to pay for food. What about the construction industry, should people really be required to pay for their housing? The list goes on and on and on for a brainless liberal who can't seem to be able to put 2 and 2 together. Nobody forced anyone to receive expensive medical treatments. You don't want to pay the bill then don't go. I get so tired in the endless circular moronic exercises liberals go through. The problem with Socialism/Liberalism is eventually you run out of other people's money.
If you would spend less time arguing with your liberal straw man, maybe you would have some clue as to WTF is actually going on in this country. I've never said anything like that. I've said in the past that I believe health insurance should be like crop insurance. The federal government covers the rare catastrophic loss, and the insurance company is on the hook for the rest. If you take the catastrophic risk away from the insurance company the premiums should be much less.

Crop insurance is an example of yet another liberal handout. Can you tell me any other businesses are insured by the federal government for ridiculously low premiums funded by taxpayer dollars? How about Ag property valuations...what a joke. We will soon need to build reservations for the farmers just like the Native Americans. I hope you and your spawn are the first to be moved into your government utopia. You have been suckling at the government teet all your life and can't understand why everyone doesn't. It is called pride and self esteem.

I couldn't agree more. Farmers are way too dependant on the government, workers are way too dependant on those ag-related jobs, and food prices are waaay too low....

Spoken like someone who is receiving the government welfare paid by others...I expected no less from you.

Darth Cheney Sun Feb 07, 2016 7:32 am

Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Here's a few interesting facts for those of you who are interested in the truth. Straight from the farm subsidy whistle blowers themselves. From '95-'12:

62% of farmers received no subsidies what so ever. Zero. None. Zilch.

Of the 38% that actually recieved subsidies, 80% averaged less than $600 a year.

How's that for livin' high on the government hog?!?

Sorry if that doesn't fit your "government teat" rhetoric.

http://farm.ewg.org/region.php?fips=00000

When you look at South Dakota data your claims don't hold true.

26 percent of farms in South Dakota did not collect subsidy payments - according to USDA

Which indicates 74 percent of farms in South Dakota DID collect subsidy payments.
80% of which receiving less than $1400 a year on average.
Which means a whopping 15% received a negligible amount of money.

Why don't we take about land valuation and property taxes you leech? You see farmers get a special break when it comes to actually paying for government and hence their love of the democratic party. Farm land is taxed at ridiculously low rates unlike every other business in the country. The can't make it without endless government breaks and subsidies all the while condemning big business and big oil who actually does have to pay their fair share. Save your farm propaganda for someone who doesn't understand the truth. I also know several farm operators who receive hundreds of thousands of dollars every year in subsidies.

http://farm.ewg.org/index.php?key=nosign

Darth Cheney Sun Feb 07, 2016 7:33 am

Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Here's a few interesting facts for those of you who are interested in the truth. Straight from the farm subsidy whistle blowers themselves. From '95-'12:

62% of farmers received no subsidies what so ever. Zero. None. Zilch.

Of the 38% that actually recieved subsidies, 80% averaged less than $600 a year.

How's that for livin' high on the government hog?!?

Sorry if that doesn't fit your "government teat" rhetoric.

http://farm.ewg.org/region.php?fips=00000

When you look at South Dakota data your claims don't hold true.

26 percent of farms in South Dakota did not collect subsidy payments - according to USDA

Which indicates 74 percent of farms in South Dakota DID collect subsidy payments.
80% of which receiving less than $1400 a year on average.
Which means a whopping 15% received a negligible amount of money.

Shortie's Ex Sun Feb 07, 2016 9:26 am

psst Darth. Welding scholarships. With ~~golden~~ bronze handcuffs. To benefit the businesses of political cronies.

Jammer Sun Feb 07, 2016 11:16 am

Shortie's Ex wrote:psst Darth. Welding scholarships. With ~~golden~~ bronze handcuffs. To benefit the businesses of political cronies.

Don't you love when Sleazy Slut joins the discussion, it adds so much. Just think how wonderful it will be when she develops the skill to string 2 or more coherent sentences together. But until then, it is back to step 1 and working on developing that first coherent sentence. It seems like it might be awhile.

nightlight88 Mon Feb 08, 2016 9:40 am

Shortie's Ex wrote:psst Darth. Welding scholarships. With ~~golden~~ bronze handcuffs. To benefit the businesses of political cronies.

WTH are you talking about?

Shortie's Ex Mon Feb 08, 2016 11:55 am

nightlight88 wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:psst Darth. Welding scholarships. With ~~golden~~ bronze handcuffs. To benefit the businesses of political cronies.

WTH are you talking about?

https://justsayingit.forumotion.com/t1569-trail-king#16771

Shortie's Ex Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:02 pm

Sure gets quiet here on JSI when the topic of political cronyism in South Dakota is broached. No gov't teat. The Repub cronies in this state can't be troubled by the slow trickle of $'s from a teat. More appropriate symbol would be a ladle and a huge slop trough from which the cronies slurp.

nightlight88 Mon Feb 08, 2016 2:22 pm

Shortie's Ex wrote:
nightlight88 wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:psst Darth. Welding scholarships. With ~~golden~~ bronze handcuffs. To benefit the businesses of political cronies.

WTH are you talking about?

https://justsayingit.forumotion.com/t1569-trail-king#16771

How about just saying straight out what you are talking about instead of insinuating crap.

Jammer Mon Feb 08, 2016 7:02 pm

nightlight88 wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:
nightlight88 wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:psst Darth. Welding scholarships. With ~~golden~~ bronze handcuffs. To benefit the businesses of political cronies.

WTH are you talking about?

https://justsayingit.forumotion.com/t1569-trail-king#16771

How about just saying straight out what you are talking about instead of insinuating crap.

It is frustrating when these grade school graduates can't string 2 coherent sentences together. As near as I can tell from her cryptic writing, the Sleazy Slut is trying to pay somebody to play with her teat. Yeah right, good luck with that one.

Shortie's Ex Mon Feb 08, 2016 9:35 pm

The JSI bloviator in chief has difficulty comprehending crisp concise posts. Apparently got to have at least 500 words of run-on bloviation.

Jammer Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:55 am

Shortie's Ex wrote:The JSI bloviator in chief has difficulty comprehending crisp concise posts. Apparently got to have at least 500 words of run-on bloviation.

Incredible, regardless of how hard the sleazy slut tries she simply cannot string two grammatically correct sentences together. This raises the question of; “Is this a condemnation of our educational system or is it merely confirmation that both sexual perversion and liberalism are the result of mental illness”?

Jammer Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:48 pm

Number 33 in a series of one million on

Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

I bet you have a neighbor who has said to you that the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer in this country. In fact, they might even be so ~~stupid~~ bold to say that for that reason they are going to support Bernie Sanders who will turn this around.

Perhaps your neighbor should watch the video below. Unless they are a brain dead progressive socialist like Jackoff Jones, they will learn differently. Yes we all have evil cretins like Jackoff Jones living in our neighborhood, but we also have some neighbors who just haven’t been informed on some issues yet.

Dr. Evil Thu Feb 11, 2016 2:27 pm

Jammer wrote:
Number 33 in a series of one million on
Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

I bet you have a neighbor who has said to you that the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer in this country. In fact, they might even be so ~~stupid~~ bold to say that for that reason they are going to support Bernie Sanders who will turn this around.

Perhaps your neighbor should watch the video below. Unless they are a brain dead progressive socialist like Jackoff Jones, they will learn differently. Yes we all have evil cretins like Jackoff Jones living in our neighborhood, but we also have some neighbors who just haven’t been informed on some issues yet.

OMG that's funny!!! The poor may have more money, but that money doesn't stretch nearly as far because of increased costs. Which would actually mean they effectively have less money. $100 today isn't nearly what it was 30 years ago. Also the "data" in their graphs was from 25+ years ago. It looks like someone has been drinking the Koch. Rolling Eyes

I'm really glad you posted this video to support your stance on this because it proves you don't have a leg to stand on. You're going to have to try harder.

Jammer Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:08 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:
Jammer wrote:
Number 33 in a series of one million on
Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

I bet you have a neighbor who has said to you that the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer in this country. In fact, they might even be so ~~stupid~~ bold to say that for that reason they are going to support Bernie Sanders who will turn this around.

Perhaps your neighbor should watch the video below. Unless they are a brain dead progressive socialist like Jackoff Jones, they will learn differently. Yes we all have evil cretins like Jackoff Jones living in our neighborhood, but we also have some neighbors who just haven’t been informed on some issues yet.

OMG that's funny!!! The poor may have more money, but that money doesn't stretch nearly as far because of increased costs. Which would actually mean they effectively have less money. $100 today isn't nearly what it was 30 years ago. Also the "data" in their graphs was from 25+ years ago. It looks like someone has been drinking the Koch. I'm really glad you posted this video to support your stance on this because it proves you don't have a leg to stand on. You're going to have to try harder.

Says the moron who never passed 5th grade math. You really are clueless when it comes to numbers, but then again YOU ARE A SOCIALIST. The same dumbass who believes everything can be free if we only elect a socialist for president.

Go pound sand you fuching moron. Better yet go read some of your progressive bullshit that defines over time as the last 25 hours. You are so fuching pathetic.

For anyone who is analytical and wants to check on how inflation affects the numbers for the poor, it would take $3,201 in INFLATED dollars to buy the same amount of goods as the original $1263 in the example. However, the data showed that the income had increased to $27,745.

That is just one more data point on why nobody should ever listen to a word Jackoff Jones says as he is either the biggest lying sack of dogshit in the world or the biggest moron. It really doesn't matter which it is because the end result is the same.

I would bet that if the same comparison was made for the last 7 year period, that OBAMA's programs and policies have reversed that trend to the detriment of the poor. Yet these dumbasses keep voting for progressive liberals.

Jammer Fri Feb 12, 2016 7:24 pm

Number 34 in a series of one million on

Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

The tree hugging bitch that lives down the street is at it again. She was running all over the neighborhood telling our neighbors that she watched the demonrat debate last night and her heroes exposed the terrible Herbert Hoover for being a Republican that caused the depression and the brilliant demonrat FDR saved us.

Well that story has certainly become urban legend thanks to our corrupt progressive socialist educational system. If only the low information voters knew the real story. It is far different than what the revisionist liberals have rewritten into American folklore.

From the video: wrote: Historian Stephen Davies names three persistent myths about the Great Depression. Myth #1: Herbert Hoover was a laissez-faire president, and it was his lack of action that lead to an economic collapse. Davies argues that in fact, Hoover was a very interventionist president, and it was his intervening in the economy that made matters worse. Myth #2: The New Deal ended the Great Depression. Davies argues that the New Deal actually made matters worse. In other countries, the Great Depression ended much sooner and more quickly than it did in the United States. Myth #3: World War II ended the Great Depression. Davies explains that military production is not real wealth.; wars destroy wealth, they do not create wealth. In fact, examination of the historical data reveals that the U.S. economy did not really start to recover until after WWII was over.

Another great video to watch is the following which features one of the greatest Americans to have ever lived. It is so sad that we have let the evil cretins rewrite history. I think all conservatives need to make sure their friends, relatives and neighbors know the TRUTH and not the LIES told by progressive liberals.

I would imagine that the great philosopher Yogi Berra would probably shake his head and say "Deja Vu all over again".

Jammer Sat Feb 13, 2016 10:34 pm

Number 35 in a series of one million on

Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

I will bet that your neighbors probably don’t know that Maine now requires childless adults to work to get food stamps. When you tell them, they will probably wonder how that has worked out.

In the first three months after Maine’s work policy went into effect, its caseload of able-bodied adults without dependents plummeted by 80 percent, falling from 13,332 recipients in Dec. 2014 to 2,678 in March 2015.

http://dailysignal.com/2016/02/08/maine-required-childless-adults-to-work-to-get-food-stamps-heres-what-happened/?utm_source=heritagefoundation&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=saturday&mkt_tok=3RkMMJWWfF9wsRovsqnJZKXonjHpfsX67%2BstW6GxlMI%2F0ER3fOvrPUfGjI4ASMtrPK%2BTFAwTG5toziV8R7jHKM1t0sEQWBHm

It would appear that exercise has once again proven that nothing trumps natural law.

Gomezz Adddams Sat Feb 13, 2016 11:22 pm

The one thing that Milton Friedman devised while as an employee at the Treasury Department that always graveled my ass was he helped devise the federal withholding tax, helping to separate taxes from the tax refund who people seem to believe is manna from heaven.

"I have no apologies for it, but I really wish we hadn't found it necessary and I wish there were some way of abolishing withholding now." - Milton Friedman

Jammer Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:43 am

Gomezz Adddams wrote:The one thing that Milton Friedman devised while as an employee at the Treasury Department that always graveled my ass was he helped devise the federal withholding tax, helping to separate taxes from the tax refund who people seem to believe is manna from heaven.

"I have no apologies for it, but I really wish we hadn't found it necessary and I wish there were some way of abolishing withholding now." - Milton Friedman

That was an interesting comment. It would appear that you are not a big fan of Milton Friedman. I on the other hand greatly admired him and believe that he was by far the most ardent American supporter and advocate of Free Market Principles.

I would be interested in learning who you think were the Americans that did more for free market principles and what their most noteworthy accomplishments were that placed them ahead of Milton Friedman.

Jammer Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:40 pm

Number 36 in a series of one million on

Liberal sinners and the sins they commit

I bet your neighbors don't know that rampant voter fraud has once again begun in this country. The demonrats have their VOTE EARLY - VOTE OFTEN campaign bus on the road once again. These people are pure slime. Be sure to watch the video in the link, but have a barf bag nearby as it is disgusting. It is almost as bad as being in the same room as Jackoff Jones.

http://patriotupdate.com/must-see-video-possible-voter-fraud-caught-on-camera-in-new-hampshire/

Be sure to let you neighbors know what is going on. And also let them know the demonrats are working hard to get illegal immigrants registered to vote. And what most people don't know is that the demonrats have already been using illegal immigrants to shift electoral votes in their favor.

The Electoral College votes are based upon population and the US Census Bureau does NOT classify people by citizenship, so when they do their census counting these illegals count. As a result the demonrats are slowly and subtly shifting Electoral Votes from more rural conservative leaning states to the more urban demonrat laden states.

So even if the demonrats are not successful in getting all of their illegals registered to DIRECTLY vote in the upcoming election, they have already figured out how to get them to vote INDIRECTLY. These people are despicable scum.

Sponsored content