Global Warming Hoax

nightlight88 wrote:With the internationa Global Warming Hoaxters meeting, maybe the true believers of this nonsense can give us some facts about how the world is doomed because of global warming climate change.

Facts only please, not BS from money grubbing activists.

Poll: Democrats say climate change a bigger threat than ISIS

Skeptical wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:With the internationa Global Warming Hoaxters meeting, maybe the true believers of this nonsense can give us some facts about how the world is doomed because of global warming climate change.

Facts only please, not BS from money grubbing activists.

IIRC the latest politically correct term for this scam is "CLIMATE DISRUPTION"  

Allied to this .. the libs fear this made up hoax more than the real and evolving terrorist\ISIS\Al Queda\Hama\Hezbollah threat.

Poll: Democrats say climate change a bigger threat than ISIS

http://theweek.com/speedreads/index/267318/speedreads-poll-democrats-say-climate-change-a-bigger-threat-than-isis

nightlight88 wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:With the internationa Global Warming Hoaxters meeting, maybe the true believers of this nonsense can give us some facts about how the world is doomed because of global warming climate change.

Facts only please, not BS from money grubbing activists.

IIRC the latest politically correct term for this scam is "CLIMATE DISRUPTION"  

Allied to this .. the libs fear this made up hoax more than the real and evolving terrorist\ISIS\Al Queda\Hama\Hezbollah threat.

Poll: Democrats say climate change a bigger threat than ISIS

http://theweek.com/speedreads/index/267318/speedreads-poll-democrats-say-climate-change-a-bigger-threat-than-isis

Silly me, here I thought some brave liberal tree hugger would stop by and try to defend this global warming BS

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Damn! And I just took delivery on my latest global warming climate change disruption prepper kit complete with two life jackets and rubber raft. Damn! If I had only seen this earlier.

O man of the city tear down thy house, build a ship; abandon wealth, seek after life; scorn possessions, save thy life. Bring up the seed of all kinds of living things into the ship which thou shalt build. Let its dimensions be well measured.

Darth Cheney wrote:Maybe Jonathan Gruber was correct:

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/11/17/what-the-mainstream-media-wont-tell-you-about-global-warming/#comments

4-- There is not ONE climate computer model that has accurately connected CO2 to climate change. In fact CO2 is at its highest levels in 13,000 years and the earth hasn’t warmed in almost 18 years. Approximately 12,750 years ago before big cars and coal plants CO2 levels were higher than today. And during some past ice ages levels were up to 20x today’s levels.

7-- You are more likely to see the tooth fairy or a unicorn than a 97% consensus of scientists believing that there is man-made global warming. The number is a convenient fraud. Investigative journalists at Popular Technology reported the 97% Study falsely classifies scientists’ papers, according to the scientists that published them.  A more extensive examination of the Cook study reported that out of the nearly 12,000 scientific papers Cook’s team evaluated, only 65 endorsed Cook’s alarmist position. That is less than 0.97%. How did they come up with 97%? Well out of all the scientists who had a definite opinion, 97% agreed there was global warming and it was the fault of mankind. And how did the Cook folks determine which scientists believed what? They didn’t ask, they read papers written by these scientists and came up with their own opinion.

8-- I changed my mind…this past February, Patrick Moore, a Canadian ecologist, and the co-founder of Greenpeace, the militant environmental group told members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee

“There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100 years.”

BladeRunner wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:Maybe Jonathan Gruber was correct:

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/11/17/what-the-mainstream-media-wont-tell-you-about-global-warming/#comments

I especially like #4, #7, and #8 in that list:

4-- There is not ONE climate computer model that has accurately connected CO2 to climate change. In fact CO2 is at its highest levels in 13,000 years and the earth hasn’t warmed in almost 18 years. Approximately 12,750 years ago before big cars and coal plants CO2 levels were higher than today. And during some past ice ages levels were up to 20x today’s levels.

7-- You are more likely to see the tooth fairy or a unicorn than a 97% consensus of scientists believing that there is man-made global warming. The number is a convenient fraud. Investigative journalists at Popular Technology reported the 97% Study falsely classifies scientists’ papers, according to the scientists that published them.  A more extensive examination of the Cook study reported that out of the nearly 12,000 scientific papers Cook’s team evaluated, only 65 endorsed Cook’s alarmist position. That is less than 0.97%. How did they come up with 97%? Well out of all the scientists who had a definite opinion, 97% agreed there was global warming and it was the fault of mankind. And how did the Cook folks determine which scientists believed what? They didn’t ask, they read papers written by these scientists and came up with their own opinion.

8-- I changed my mind…this past February, Patrick Moore, a Canadian ecologist, and the co-founder of Greenpeace, the militant environmental group told members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee

“There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth’s atmosphere over the past 100 years.”

Shortie's Lover wrote:Loved hearing Jerry Brown call out Ted Cruz on this topic.  Gov Brown is living the real effects of climate change in Cali.

Shortie's Lover wrote:Loved hearing Jerry Brown call out Ted Cruz on this topic.  Gov Brown is living the real effects of climate change in Cali.

Natural weather patterns, not man-made global warming, are causing the historic drought parching California, says a study out Monday from federal scientists.

The study notes that this ridge — which has resulted in decreased rain and snowfall since 2011 — is almost opposite to what computer models predict would result from human-caused climate change.

The NOAA report says midwinter precipitation is projected to increase because of human-caused climate change over most of the state. Seager said a low-pressure system, not a high-pressure system, would probably form off the California coast because of climate change.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Shortie's Lover wrote:Loved hearing Jerry Brown call out Ted Cruz on this topic.  Gov Brown is living the real effects of climate change in Cali.

Regardless of what Governor "Moonbeam" claims, the California drought hasn't been caused by climate change/global warming. In fact global warming computer modeling predicts thatCalifornia should be seeing an increase in moisture not a decrease.  

Natural weather patterns, not man-made global warming, are causing the historic drought parching California, says a study out Monday from federal scientists.

And

The study notes that this ridge — which has resulted in decreased rain and snowfall since 2011 — is almost opposite to what computer models predict would result from human-caused climate change.

The NOAA report says midwinter precipitation is projected to increase because of human-caused climate change over most of the state. Seager said a low-pressure system, not a high-pressure system, would probably form off the California coast because of climate change.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2014/12/08/california-drought-cause-noaa/20095869/

This is so typical of you global warming alarmists. They/you scold the skeptics when they use normal weather events as proof that there is no global warming but then flip and flop and infer the same trying to prove your "settled science".

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Shortie's Lover wrote:Loved hearing Jerry Brown call out Ted Cruz on this topic.  Gov Brown is living the real effects of climate change in Cali.

Regardless of what Governor "Moonbeam" claims, the California drought hasn't been caused by climate change/global warming. In fact global warming computer modeling predicts thatCalifornia should be seeing an increase in moisture not a decrease.  

Natural weather patterns, not man-made global warming, are causing the historic drought parching California, says a study out Monday from federal scientists.

And

The study notes that this ridge — which has resulted in decreased rain and snowfall since 2011 — is almost opposite to what computer models predict would result from human-caused climate change.

The NOAA report says midwinter precipitation is projected to increase because of human-caused climate change over most of the state. Seager said a low-pressure system, not a high-pressure system, would probably form off the California coast because of climate change.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2014/12/08/california-drought-cause-noaa/20095869/

This is so typical of you global warming alarmists. They/you scold the skeptics when they use normal weather events as proof that there is no global warming but then flip and flop and infer the same trying to prove your "settled science".

Paquette wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Shortie's Lover wrote:Loved hearing Jerry Brown call out Ted Cruz on this topic.  Gov Brown is living the real effects of climate change in Cali.

Regardless of what Governor "Moonbeam" claims, the California drought hasn't been caused by climate change/global warming. In fact global warming computer modeling predicts thatCalifornia should be seeing an increase in moisture not a decrease.  

Natural weather patterns, not man-made global warming, are causing the historic drought parching California, says a study out Monday from federal scientists.

And

The study notes that this ridge — which has resulted in decreased rain and snowfall since 2011 — is almost opposite to what computer models predict would result from human-caused climate change.

The NOAA report says midwinter precipitation is projected to increase because of human-caused climate change over most of the state. Seager said a low-pressure system, not a high-pressure system, would probably form off the California coast because of climate change.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2014/12/08/california-drought-cause-noaa/20095869/

This is so typical of you global warming alarmists. They/you scold the skeptics when they use normal weather events as proof that there is no global warming but then flip and flop and infer the same trying to prove your "settled science".

And you believe the lame stream media and the very scientists that are pushing the climate change hoax? How in the world can you believe this study when they're lying to you about AGW?  

nightlight88 wrote:The continual drum beat of the warmists that "the science is settled" or "the debate is over" is nothing but bullshit.

HOw about you tell us all, with a straight face, that you believe that computer models, designed by people who have a real stake in the global warming scam, can predict anything about the climate?

Paquette wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:The continual drum beat of the warmists that "the science is settled" or "the debate is over" is nothing but bullshit.

HOw about you tell us all, with a straight face, that you believe that computer models, designed by people who have a real stake in the global warming scam, can predict anything about the climate?

That's exactly what I was trying to tell Gomezz after he dragged out the warmists and their computer models. He must be one of those Scientologists.

Paquette wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:The continual drum beat of the warmists that "the science is settled" or "the debate is over" is nothing but bullshit.

HOw about you tell us all, with a straight face, that you believe that computer models, designed by people who have a real stake in the global warming scam, can predict anything about the climate?

That's exactly what I was trying to tell Gomezz after he dragged out the warmists and their computer models. He must be one of those Scientologists.

Jammer wrote:

Paquette wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:The continual drum beat of the warmists that "the science is settled" or "the debate is over" is nothing but bullshit.

HOw about you tell us all, with a straight face, that you believe that computer models, designed by people who have a real stake in the global warming scam, can predict anything about the climate?

That's exactly what I was trying to tell Gomezz after he dragged out the warmists and their computer models. He must be one of those Scientologists.

And just what would a God denier like you know about it?

nightlight88 wrote:This thread is about the global warming hoax, no sense in deflecting.

Since you believe the computer models completed by those who have an agenda, I understand why you want to get off that topic.

Skeptical wrote:
Money can buy a lot of things, things such as food, clothes, cars, concert/event tickets politicians and yes, scientists for those wanting to push an agenda.

Follow the money !