What your neighbors may not know, but maybe should:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:Question for you Jammer. Let's say you're driving in rural South Dakota and the fuel pump in your car breaks. The only auto parts store in town is owned and operated by a Liberal. The nearest conservative auto parts store in over 50 miles away. What do you do?

A) Breakdown and buy the part from the Liberal
B) Call someone to pick you put and waste two hours getting the part from the conservative
C) Pray to God to send you down an angel to fix your car
D) Its a stupid question because I haven't step out of my bunker since 2001

LOL Mr Jammer deflects again.  Indeed a real dilemma Ham Flower?  


These guys don't do very well with multiple choice questions.  Can I help you Mr Jammer ?  Without any further discussion of "bunker" it appears that D) is not the correct answer.


So is it A) ?
             B) ?
             C) ?

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:Question for you Jammer. Let's say you're driving in rural South Dakota and the fuel pump in your car breaks. The only auto parts store in town is owned and operated by a Liberal. The nearest conservative auto parts store in over 50 miles away. What do you do?

A) Breakdown and buy the part from the Liberal
B) Call someone to pick you put and waste two hours getting the part from the conservative
C) Pray to God to send you down an angel to fix your car
D) Its a stupid question because I haven't step out of my bunker since 2001

I don't think the local Fix-Em-Up™ parts store would have a fuel pump for my Jaguar XJ.

Oh Gomezz I feel your pain.  It is real difficult to locate parts for our Subaru as we get out around the frontier. We have enjoyed lube service at Ham Flower?'s shop on a couple of occasions as we've travelled west.  Thankfully we have a great dealer locally.

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:Question for you Jammer. Let's say you're driving in rural South Dakota and the fuel pump in your car breaks. The only auto parts store in town is owned and operated by a Liberal. The nearest conservative auto parts store in over 50 miles away. What do you do?

A) Breakdown and buy the part from the Liberal
B) Call someone to pick you put and waste two hours getting the part from the conservative
C) Pray to God to send you down an angel to fix your car
D) Its a stupid question because I haven't step out of my bunker since 2001

LOL Mr Jammer deflects again.  Indeed a real dilemma Ham Flower?  


These guys don't do very well with multiple choice questions.  Can I help you Mr Jammer ?  Without any further discussion of "bunker" it appears that D) is not the correct answer.


So is it A) ?
             B) ?
             C) ?

Hey Butt Hole, what's the deal.  You can't answer the question and need to send Sleazy Slut in for you to spew some of her mindless rants?  I don't know which one of you is the most disgusting, I guess it is a little like last night's Iowa democrat caucus between Socialist Sanders and Heinous Hillary - A DEAD HEAT.

LIBERALISM IS PURE EVIL AND LIBERALS ARE JUST PLAIN DISGUSTING

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:Question for you Jammer. Let's say you're driving in rural South Dakota and the fuel pump in your car breaks. The only auto parts store in town is owned and operated by a Liberal. The nearest conservative auto parts store in over 50 miles away. What do you do?

A) Breakdown and buy the part from the Liberal
B) Call someone to pick you put and waste two hours getting the part from the conservative
C) Pray to God to send you down an angel to fix your car
D) Its a stupid question because I haven't step out of my bunker since 2001

LOL Mr Jammer deflects again.  Indeed a real dilemma Ham Flower?  


These guys don't do very well with multiple choice questions.  Can I help you Mr Jammer ?  Without any further discussion of "bunker" it appears that D) is not the correct answer.


So is it A) ?
             B) ?
             C) ?

Hey Butt Hole, what's the deal.  You can't answer the question and need to send Sleazy Slut in for you to spew some of her mindless rants?  I don't know which one of you is the most disgusting, I guess it is a little like last night's Iowa democrat caucus between Socialist Sanders and Heinous Hillary - A DEAD HEAT.

LIBERALISM IS PURE EVIL AND LIBERALS ARE JUST PLAIN DISGUSTING

Such cute alliteration.  But it is not accurate.  I'm very much monogamous.

But yah.  We get it.  You have no respect for women.

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:Question for you Jammer. Let's say you're driving in rural South Dakota and the fuel pump in your car breaks. The only auto parts store in town is owned and operated by a Liberal. The nearest conservative auto parts store in over 50 miles away. What do you do?

A) Breakdown and buy the part from the Liberal
B) Call someone to pick you put and waste two hours getting the part from the conservative
C) Pray to God to send you down an angel to fix your car
D) Its a stupid question because I haven't step out of my bunker since 2001

LOL Mr Jammer deflects again.  Indeed a real dilemma Ham Flower?  


These guys don't do very well with multiple choice questions.  Can I help you Mr Jammer ?  Without any further discussion of "bunker" it appears that D) is not the correct answer.


So is it A) ?
             B) ?
             C) ?

Hey Butt Hole, what's the deal.  You can't answer the question and need to send Sleazy Slut in for you to spew some of her mindless rants?  I don't know which one of you is the most disgusting, I guess it is a little like last night's Iowa democrat caucus between Socialist Sanders and Heinous Hillary - A DEAD HEAT.

LIBERALISM IS PURE EVIL AND LIBERALS ARE JUST PLAIN DISGUSTING

Such cute alliteration.  But it is not accurate.  I'm very much monogamous.

But yah.  We get it.  You have no respect for women.

Sleazy Slut, YOU ARE NO WOMAN.

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:Question for you Jammer. Let's say you're driving in rural South Dakota and the fuel pump in your car breaks. The only auto parts store in town is owned and operated by a Liberal. The nearest conservative auto parts store in over 50 miles away. What do you do?

A) Breakdown and buy the part from the Liberal
B) Call someone to pick you put and waste two hours getting the part from the conservative
C) Pray to God to send you down an angel to fix your car
D) Its a stupid question because I haven't step out of my bunker since 2001

LOL Mr Jammer deflects again.  Indeed a real dilemma Ham Flower?  


These guys don't do very well with multiple choice questions.  Can I help you Mr Jammer ?  Without any further discussion of "bunker" it appears that D) is not the correct answer.


So is it A) ?
             B) ?
             C) ?

Hey Butt Hole, what's the deal.  You can't answer the question and need to send Sleazy Slut in for you to spew some of her mindless rants?  I don't know which one of you is the most disgusting, I guess it is a little like last night's Iowa democrat caucus between Socialist Sanders and Heinous Hillary - A DEAD HEAT.

LIBERALISM IS PURE EVIL AND LIBERALS ARE JUST PLAIN DISGUSTING

Such cute alliteration.  But it is not accurate.  I'm very much monogamous.

But yah.  We get it.  You have no respect for women.

Sleazy Slut, YOU ARE NO WOMAN.

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:Question for you Jammer. Let's say you're driving in rural South Dakota and the fuel pump in your car breaks. The only auto parts store in town is owned and operated by a Liberal. The nearest conservative auto parts store in over 50 miles away. What do you do?

A) Breakdown and buy the part from the Liberal
B) Call someone to pick you put and waste two hours getting the part from the conservative
C) Pray to God to send you down an angel to fix your car
D) Its a stupid question because I haven't step out of my bunker since 2001

LOL Mr Jammer deflects again.  Indeed a real dilemma Ham Flower?  


These guys don't do very well with multiple choice questions.  Can I help you Mr Jammer ?  Without any further discussion of "bunker" it appears that D) is not the correct answer.


So is it A) ?
             B) ?
             C) ?

Hey Butt Hole, what's the deal.  You can't answer the question and need to send Sleazy Slut in for you to spew some of her mindless rants?  I don't know which one of you is the most disgusting, I guess it is a little like last night's Iowa democrat caucus between Socialist Sanders and Heinous Hillary - A DEAD HEAT.

LIBERALISM IS PURE EVIL AND LIBERALS ARE JUST PLAIN DISGUSTING

Such cute alliteration.  But it is not accurate.  I'm very much monogamous.

But yah.  We get it.  You have no respect for women.

Sleazy Slut, YOU ARE NO WOMAN.

I hope that you someday invite the Lord into your life.  There's so much hate in you.

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:Question for you Jammer. Let's say you're driving in rural South Dakota and the fuel pump in your car breaks. The only auto parts store in town is owned and operated by a Liberal. The nearest conservative auto parts store in over 50 miles away. What do you do?

A) Breakdown and buy the part from the Liberal
B) Call someone to pick you put and waste two hours getting the part from the conservative
C) Pray to God to send you down an angel to fix your car
D) Its a stupid question because I haven't step out of my bunker since 2001

LOL Mr Jammer deflects again.  Indeed a real dilemma Ham Flower?  


These guys don't do very well with multiple choice questions.  Can I help you Mr Jammer ?  Without any further discussion of "bunker" it appears that D) is not the correct answer.


So is it A) ?
             B) ?
             C) ?

Hey Butt Hole, what's the deal.  You can't answer the question and need to send Sleazy Slut in for you to spew some of her mindless rants?  I don't know which one of you is the most disgusting, I guess it is a little like last night's Iowa democrat caucus between Socialist Sanders and Heinous Hillary - A DEAD HEAT.

LIBERALISM IS PURE EVIL AND LIBERALS ARE JUST PLAIN DISGUSTING

Such cute alliteration.  But it is not accurate.  I'm very much monogamous.

But yah.  We get it.  You have no respect for women.

Sleazy Slut, YOU ARE NO WOMAN.

A woman.  I am.  Most assuredly.  

Are you like those knuckle dragging mouth breathing SD legislators Roger Hunt, Al Novstrup and Fred Deutsch ?  Have to do a pee-pee check to be certain ?

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Ham Flower? wrote:Question for you Jammer. Let's say you're driving in rural South Dakota and the fuel pump in your car breaks. The only auto parts store in town is owned and operated by a Liberal. The nearest conservative auto parts store in over 50 miles away. What do you do?

A) Breakdown and buy the part from the Liberal
B) Call someone to pick you put and waste two hours getting the part from the conservative
C) Pray to God to send you down an angel to fix your car
D) Its a stupid question because I haven't step out of my bunker since 2001

LOL Mr Jammer deflects again.  Indeed a real dilemma Ham Flower?  


These guys don't do very well with multiple choice questions.  Can I help you Mr Jammer ?  Without any further discussion of "bunker" it appears that D) is not the correct answer.


So is it A) ?
             B) ?
             C) ?

Hey Butt Hole, what's the deal.  You can't answer the question and need to send Sleazy Slut in for you to spew some of her mindless rants?  I don't know which one of you is the most disgusting, I guess it is a little like last night's Iowa democrat caucus between Socialist Sanders and Heinous Hillary - A DEAD HEAT.

LIBERALISM IS PURE EVIL AND LIBERALS ARE JUST PLAIN DISGUSTING

Such cute alliteration.  But it is not accurate.  I'm very much monogamous.

But yah.  We get it.  You have no respect for women.

Sleazy Slut, YOU ARE NO WOMAN.

I hope that you someday invite the Lord into your life.  There's so much hate in you.

Oh Dr Jones make note that Mr Jammer found need to criticize you for the sins which he attributes to you rather than acknowledge his own shortfalls.  And the rest of the faux faithful of JSI simply stand idly by.

Jammer wrote:

OUCH, a stinging rebuke by the confessed baby killer, acknowledged supporter of sexual perversion and self-acclaimed promoter of government sponsored theft.  

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

OUCH, a stinging rebuke by the confessed baby killer, acknowledged supporter of sexual perversion and self-acclaimed promoter of government sponsored theft.  

#1.  The Bible does not define the beginning of life. 

#2.  The Bible makes no claim as to which particular sexual acts are acceptable in the eyes of the Lord.

#3.  What government sponsored theft are you referring to?

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

OUCH, a stinging rebuke by the confessed baby killer, acknowledged supporter of sexual perversion and self-acclaimed promoter of government sponsored theft.  

#1.  The Bible does not define the beginning of life. 

#2.  The Bible makes no claim as to which particular sexual acts are acceptable in the eyes of the Lord.

#3.  What government sponsored theft are you referring to?

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

OUCH, a stinging rebuke by the confessed baby killer, acknowledged supporter of sexual perversion and self-acclaimed promoter of government sponsored theft.  

#1.  The Bible does not define the beginning of life. 

#2.  The Bible makes no claim as to which particular sexual acts are acceptable in the eyes of the Lord.

#3.  What government sponsored theft are you referring to?

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

OUCH, a stinging rebuke by the confessed baby killer, acknowledged supporter of sexual perversion and self-acclaimed promoter of government sponsored theft.  

#1.  The Bible does not define the beginning of life. 

#2.  The Bible makes no claim as to which particular sexual acts are acceptable in the eyes of the Lord.

#3.  What government sponsored theft are you referring to?

Most likely progressive taxation (income tax). In the Social Contract all government authority arises from the consent of the governed. Certain Rights are surrendered by the People in return for protection by the government of their life, liberty and properties. Citizens can only surrender rights which they possess. When the government assumes powers (rights that the citizens do not hold or could not hold such as theft/robbery) then under Natural Law the government is ruling arbitrarily (tyranny). Under Natural Law, taxation should be apportioned among the population equally. With direct taxation this is an impossibility since the tax base is uneven per person. The Framers understood this and wrote it into the Constitution (Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 - "No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.") While the 16th Amendment made it legal for the government to do this, it didn't make it moral. Hence taxation = theft. Class dismissed.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

OUCH, a stinging rebuke by the confessed baby killer, acknowledged supporter of sexual perversion and self-acclaimed promoter of government sponsored theft.  

#1.  The Bible does not define the beginning of life. 

#2.  The Bible makes no claim as to which particular sexual acts are acceptable in the eyes of the Lord.

#3.  What government sponsored theft are you referring to?

"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I have appointed you a prophet to the nations." - Jeremiah 1:5

Are you saying that life begins before conception?  There's also the "formed" part that adds more confusion.   You will remember that Adam was also "formed" from dust, but was not a living soul until he breathed life through his nostrils.  Wouldn't that suggest that life begins when you take your first breath?

"For whom He foreknew He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the first-born among many brethren." - Romans 8:29

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

OUCH, a stinging rebuke by the confessed baby killer, acknowledged supporter of sexual perversion and self-acclaimed promoter of government sponsored theft.  

#1.  The Bible does not define the beginning of life. 

#2.  The Bible makes no claim as to which particular sexual acts are acceptable in the eyes of the Lord.

#3.  What government sponsored theft are you referring to?

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it [is] abomination" - Leviticus 18:22

"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood [shall be] upon them." - Leviticus 20:13

"And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet." - Romans 1:27

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

OUCH, a stinging rebuke by the confessed baby killer, acknowledged supporter of sexual perversion and self-acclaimed promoter of government sponsored theft.  

#1.  The Bible does not define the beginning of life. 

#2.  The Bible makes no claim as to which particular sexual acts are acceptable in the eyes of the Lord.

#3.  What government sponsored theft are you referring to?

Most likely progressive taxation (income tax). In the Social Contract all government authority arises from the consent of the governed. Certain Rights are surrendered by the People in return for protection by the government of their life, liberty and properties. Citizens can only surrender rights which they possess. When the government assumes powers (rights that the citizens do not hold or could not hold such as theft/robbery) then under Natural Law the government is ruling arbitrarily (tyranny). Under Natural Law, taxation should be apportioned among the population equally. With direct taxation this is an impossibility since the tax base is uneven per person. The Framers understood this and wrote it into the Constitution (Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 - "No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.") While the 16th Amendment made it legal for the government to do this, it didn't make it moral. Hence taxation = theft. Class dismissed.

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

OUCH, a stinging rebuke by the confessed baby killer, acknowledged supporter of sexual perversion and self-acclaimed promoter of government sponsored theft.  

#1.  The Bible does not define the beginning of life. 

#2.  The Bible makes no claim as to which particular sexual acts are acceptable in the eyes of the Lord.

#3.  What government sponsored theft are you referring to?

Most likely progressive taxation (income tax). In the Social Contract all government authority arises from the consent of the governed. Certain Rights are surrendered by the People in return for protection by the government of their life, liberty and properties. Citizens can only surrender rights which they possess. When the government assumes powers (rights that the citizens do not hold or could not hold such as theft/robbery) then under Natural Law the government is ruling arbitrarily (tyranny). Under Natural Law, taxation should be apportioned among the population equally. With direct taxation this is an impossibility since the tax base is uneven per person. The Framers understood this and wrote it into the Constitution (Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 - "No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.") While the 16th Amendment made it legal for the government to do this, it didn't make it moral. Hence taxation = theft. Class dismissed.

In the context of the original statement, the Bible not only states time and time again that taxes need to be payed, but it is also supports the type of wealth redistribution that many so called "Christians" so venomously attack.  Class dismissed??  

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Jammer wrote:

OUCH, a stinging rebuke by the confessed baby killer, acknowledged supporter of sexual perversion and self-acclaimed promoter of government sponsored theft.  

#1.  The Bible does not define the beginning of life. 

#2.  The Bible makes no claim as to which particular sexual acts are acceptable in the eyes of the Lord.

#3.  What government sponsored theft are you referring to?

Most likely progressive taxation (income tax). In the Social Contract all government authority arises from the consent of the governed. Certain Rights are surrendered by the People in return for protection by the government of their life, liberty and properties. Citizens can only surrender rights which they possess. When the government assumes powers (rights that the citizens do not hold or could not hold such as theft/robbery) then under Natural Law the government is ruling arbitrarily (tyranny). Under Natural Law, taxation should be apportioned among the population equally. With direct taxation this is an impossibility since the tax base is uneven per person. The Framers understood this and wrote it into the Constitution (Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 - "No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.") While the 16th Amendment made it legal for the government to do this, it didn't make it moral. Hence taxation = theft. Class dismissed.

In the context of the original statement, the Bible not only states time and time again that taxes need to be payed, but it is also supports the type of wealth redistribution that many so called "Christians" so venomously attack.  Class dismissed??  

Read Minister Jonathan Mayhew's “A Discourse Concerning Unlimited Submission and Non-Resistance to the Higher Powers.”.
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/discourse-concerning-unlimited-submission-and-non-resistance-to-the-higher-powers/

While long and a bit of a slog the gist is that God does not govern arbitrarily. That a monarch is limited by Natural law and reason.  Since God does not rule arbitrarily like a  tyrant, so can't a monarch. Disobedience then is lawful and moral if it is against monarchs who “enjoin things that are inconsistent with the demands of God.” This is the justification for the end of the Divine Right of Kings.

While there maybe some dispute as to whether Mayhew coined the term "No taxation without representation is tyranny", there is no doubt that his collective sermons said as much. Schooled yet again Fcukstik.

Darth Cheney wrote:God tells us to work and not depend on the hard work of others you slug. No matter how you try and twist it you are a leech upon society and always have been...repent!

Deuteronomy 24:14-15

14 Do not take advantage of a hired worker who is poor and needy, whether that worker is a fellow Israelite or a foreigner residing in one of your towns. 15 Pay them their wages each day before sunset, because they are poor and are counting on it. Otherwise they may cry to the Lord against you, and you will be guilty of sin.

Dr. Jones wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:God tells us to work and not depend on the hard work of others you slug. No matter how you try and twist it you are a leech upon society and always have been...repent!

Then there's this:

Deuteronomy 24:14-15

14 Do not take advantage of a hired worker who is poor and needy, whether that worker is a fellow Israelite or a foreigner residing in one of your towns. 15 Pay them their wages each day before sunset, because they are poor and are counting on it. Otherwise they may cry to the Lord against you, and you will be guilty of sin.

Darth Cheney wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:God tells us to work and not depend on the hard work of others you slug. No matter how you try and twist it you are a leech upon society and always have been...repent!

Then there's this:

Deuteronomy 24:14-15

14 Do not take advantage of a hired worker who is poor and needy, whether that worker is a fellow Israelite or a foreigner residing in one of your towns. 15 Pay them their wages each day before sunset, because they are poor and are counting on it. Otherwise they may cry to the Lord against you, and you will be guilty of sin.

Note: "hired worker" not liberal slug