HomeExamples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
+9
Just Braying It
sodaknomad
Shortie's Ex
Darth Cheney
Freedom Forever
Skeptical
nightlight88
Twinkies
BladeRunner
13 posters
Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4 
Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
BladeRunner Tue Apr 23, 2013 8:45 am
BladeRunner- Posts : 1922
Join date : 2012-12-21
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
BladeRunner Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:00 am
People like pse are the reason Obama is in office. Unfortunately there seems to be more of him than you.
What does pse have to do with the OP?
In fact, what does Obama have to do with the OP?
Off topic, much?
BladeRunner- Posts : 1922
Join date : 2012-12-21
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Twinkies Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:07 am
trollololololololoooololololol
Twinkies- Posts : 389
Join date : 2013-03-19
Age : 79
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
BladeRunner Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:08 am
Twinkies wrote:trollololololololoooololololol
Have a look at yourself
BladeRunner- Posts : 1922
Join date : 2012-12-21
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
nightlight88 Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:31 am
BladeRunner wrote:Twinkies wrote:trollololololololoooololololol
Have a look at yourself
Good old 'twinges up the leg' is one of the first to whine about a poster not adding to the topic but she is one of the worst offenders.
nightlight88- Posts : 1680
Join date : 2012-12-25
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Twinkies Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:36 am
Hey I just learn from the best my best pal nightlight!! When are you bringing the beers over again? Ill supply the Cigars!nightlight88 wrote:
Good old 'twinges up the leg' is one of the first to whine about a poster not adding to the topic but she is one of the worst offenders.
Twinkies- Posts : 389
Join date : 2013-03-19
Age : 79
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
BladeRunner Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:59 am
Isn't it great, Twinks, that you can do what you're doing here and not have a hammer come down on you?
Enjoy yourself. Now if someone says something you don't like, I must give you a fair warning...
There is no "REPORT" button with which to bicker to the mods here, however.
You'll just have to put your man pants on and take it.
Glad to have you here! Regardless of what some others say about you, I think you do add interesting input from an opposing view.
Enjoy yourself. Now if someone says something you don't like, I must give you a fair warning...
There is no "REPORT" button with which to bicker to the mods here, however.
You'll just have to put your man pants on and take it.
Glad to have you here! Regardless of what some others say about you, I think you do add interesting input from an opposing view.
BladeRunner- Posts : 1922
Join date : 2012-12-21
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Skeptical Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:29 am
At present the one interesting input I want to see from Twinks are the answers to the questions he/she/it so strongly tries to avoid..
I am sure he/she/it recalls these from the "Kerry on Benghazi" thread.
Who were the culprits and what full measure of justice did they receive from the US for their actions?
Or is it just possible Hillary was the ring leader by saying, "What difference does it make now" after many months had elapsed with no action and this will the official stance in matters such as the like of Benghazi and/or Boston?.
I am sure he/she/it recalls these from the "Kerry on Benghazi" thread.
Who were the culprits and what full measure of justice did they receive from the US for their actions?
Or is it just possible Hillary was the ring leader by saying, "What difference does it make now" after many months had elapsed with no action and this will the official stance in matters such as the like of Benghazi and/or Boston?.
Skeptical- Posts : 2932
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : Right here
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Twinkies Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:06 pm
I dont need to report someone every time I disagree with them. Im an adult, not a cry baby.BladeRunner wrote:Isn't it great, Twinks, that you can do what you're doing here and not have a hammer come down on you?
Enjoy yourself. Now if someone says something you don't like, I must give you a fair warning...
There is no "REPORT" button with which to bicker to the mods here, however.
You'll just have to put your man pants on and take it.
Glad to have you here! Regardless of what some others say about you, I think you do add interesting input from an opposing view.
Twinkies- Posts : 389
Join date : 2013-03-19
Age : 79
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Twinkies Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:08 pm
Do you even really know what happened in Benghazi? Sometimes in war things dont always happen as planned and people die. Are we going to make a big deal out of every time mistakes happen and US people die? Do you really want to set that precedence?Skeptical wrote:At present the one interesting input I want to see from Twinks are the answers to the questions he/she/it so strongly tries to avoid..
I am sure he/she/it recalls these from the "Kerry on Benghazi" thread.
Who were the culprits and what full measure of justice did they receive from the US for their actions?
Or is it just possible Hillary was the ring leader by saying, "What difference does it make now" after many months had elapsed with no action and this will the official stance in matters such as the like of Benghazi and/or Boston?.
Twinkies- Posts : 389
Join date : 2013-03-19
Age : 79
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
BladeRunner Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:43 pm
Twinkies wrote:I dont need to report someone every time I disagree with them. Im an adult, not a cry baby.BladeRunner wrote:Isn't it great, Twinks, that you can do what you're doing here and not have a hammer come down on you?
Enjoy yourself. Now if someone says something you don't like, I must give you a fair warning...
There is no "REPORT" button with which to bicker to the mods here, however.
You'll just have to put your man pants on and take it.
Glad to have you here! Regardless of what some others say about you, I think you do add interesting input from an opposing view.
Then maybe you should act like it?
BladeRunner- Posts : 1922
Join date : 2012-12-21
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
BladeRunner Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:45 pm
Twinkies wrote:
Do you even really know what happened in Benghazi? Sometimes in war things dont always happen as planned and people die. Are we going to make a big deal out of every time mistakes happen and US people die? Do you really want to set that precedence?
Did OBAMA even know what happened in Benghazi when he made the statement that those responsible would be held accountable?
But then, you really don't care if he is held responsible for his broken promises, are you?
BladeRunner- Posts : 1922
Join date : 2012-12-21
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Twinkies Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:45 pm
BladeRunner wrote:
Then maybe you should act like it?
Twinkies- Posts : 389
Join date : 2013-03-19
Age : 79
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Freedom Forever Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:47 pm
Twinkies wrote:Do you even really know what happened in Benghazi? Sometimes in war things dont always happen as planned and people die. Are we going to make a big deal out of every time mistakes happen and US people die? Do you really want to set that precedence?Skeptical wrote:At present the one interesting input I want to see from Twinks are the answers to the questions he/she/it so strongly tries to avoid..
I am sure he/she/it recalls these from the "Kerry on Benghazi" thread.
Who were the culprits and what full measure of justice did they receive from the US for their actions?
Or is it just possible Hillary was the ring leader by saying, "What difference does it make now" after many months had elapsed with no action and this will the official stance in matters such as the like of Benghazi and/or Boston?.
So, what happened?
Freedom Forever- Posts : 1123
Join date : 2013-01-14
Location : Yur Mom's House
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Twinkies Tue Apr 23, 2013 12:52 pm
I have no idea. And I never will. You either.Freedom Forever wrote:Twinkies wrote:Do you even really know what happened in Benghazi? Sometimes in war things dont always happen as planned and people die. Are we going to make a big deal out of every time mistakes happen and US people die? Do you really want to set that precedence?Skeptical wrote:At present the one interesting input I want to see from Twinks are the answers to the questions he/she/it so strongly tries to avoid..
I am sure he/she/it recalls these from the "Kerry on Benghazi" thread.
Who were the culprits and what full measure of justice did they receive from the US for their actions?
Or is it just possible Hillary was the ring leader by saying, "What difference does it make now" after many months had elapsed with no action and this will the official stance in matters such as the like of Benghazi and/or Boston?.
So, what happened?
Twinkies- Posts : 389
Join date : 2013-03-19
Age : 79
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
BladeRunner Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:01 pm
Twinkies wrote:I have no idea. And I never will. You either.Freedom Forever wrote:Twinkies wrote:Do you even really know what happened in Benghazi? Sometimes in war things dont always happen as planned and people die. Are we going to make a big deal out of every time mistakes happen and US people die? Do you really want to set that precedence?Skeptical wrote:At present the one interesting input I want to see from Twinks are the answers to the questions he/she/it so strongly tries to avoid..
I am sure he/she/it recalls these from the "Kerry on Benghazi" thread.
Who were the culprits and what full measure of justice did they receive from the US for their actions?
Or is it just possible Hillary was the ring leader by saying, "What difference does it make now" after many months had elapsed with no action and this will the official stance in matters such as the like of Benghazi and/or Boston?.
So, what happened?
And that's why we should just stop investigating it. There are bigger fish to fry.
In fact, all cold cases should be stopped immediately. The statute of limitations on any crimes shall now and forever be... 3 months. That will do it. If no evidence is found before the 3 month waiting period, case closed.
BladeRunner- Posts : 1922
Join date : 2012-12-21
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Skeptical Tue Apr 23, 2013 1:26 pm
I have no idea. And I never will. You either.
There we are folks,Twinks again showing loyalty to the MT suit in the Wh and his stooges by going back back to the tried and true Hillarysentiment, "What difference does it make now anyway" or Ketchup Kerry, ""We Got A Lot More Important Things To Move On to"
Skeptical- Posts : 2932
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : Right here
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Twinkies Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:25 pm
Do you think you know everything that went on during Bush's term or Regan's? Sometimes stuff is with held from the american public. Sometimes for valid points sometimes not. But do you really want the military/CIA to start deciding if they will do a mission on weather or not the public will find out about it.Skeptical wrote:I have no idea. And I never will. You either.
There we are folks,Twinks again showing loyalty to the MT suit in the Wh and his stooges by going back back to the tried and true Hillarysentiment, "What difference does it make now anyway" or Ketchup Kerry, ""We Got A Lot More Important Things To Move On to"
Twinkies- Posts : 389
Join date : 2013-03-19
Age : 79
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Darth Cheney Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:41 pm
Twinkies wrote:Do you think you know everything that went on during Bush's term or Regan's? Sometimes stuff is with held from the american public. Sometimes for valid points sometimes not. But do you really want the military/CIA to start deciding if they will do a mission on weather or not the public will find out about it.Skeptical wrote:I have no idea. And I never will. You either.
There we are folks,Twinks again showing loyalty to the MT suit in the Wh and his stooges by going back back to the tried and true Hillarysentiment, "What difference does it make now anyway" or Ketchup Kerry, ""We Got A Lot More Important Things To Move On to"
The SS would have never been able to get as much done in Germany under those rules that is for sure.
I have a question...why are liberals so f'n stupid?
Darth Cheney- Posts : 3557
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : SE SD
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
BladeRunner Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:42 pm
Twinkies wrote:Do you think you know everything that went on during Bush's term or Regan's? Sometimes stuff is with held from the american public. Sometimes for valid points sometimes not. But do you really want the military/CIA to start deciding if they will do a mission on weather or not the public will find out about it.Skeptical wrote:I have no idea. And I never will. You either.
There we are folks,Twinks again showing loyalty to the MT suit in the Wh and his stooges by going back back to the tried and true Hillarysentiment, "What difference does it make now anyway" or Ketchup Kerry, ""We Got A Lot More Important Things To Move On to"
What would the "weather" have to do with it?
BladeRunner- Posts : 1922
Join date : 2012-12-21
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Twinkies Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:48 pm
Why do CONservatives make a deal out of the smallest things?BladeRunner wrote:Twinkies wrote:Do you think you know everything that went on during Bush's term or Regan's? Sometimes stuff is with held from the american public. Sometimes for valid points sometimes not. But do you really want the military/CIA to start deciding if they will do a mission on weather or not the public will find out about it.Skeptical wrote:I have no idea. And I never will. You either.
There we are folks,Twinks again showing loyalty to the MT suit in the Wh and his stooges by going back back to the tried and true Hillarysentiment, "What difference does it make now anyway" or Ketchup Kerry, ""We Got A Lot More Important Things To Move On to"
What would the "weather" have to do with it?
Twinkies- Posts : 389
Join date : 2013-03-19
Age : 79
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
nightlight88 Tue Apr 23, 2013 2:52 pm
BladeRunner wrote:Twinkies wrote:Do you think you know everything that went on during Bush's term or Regan's? Sometimes stuff is with held from the american public. Sometimes for valid points sometimes not. But do you really want the military/CIA to start deciding if they will do a mission on weather or not the public will find out about it.Skeptical wrote:I have no idea. And I never will. You either.
There we are folks,Twinks again showing loyalty to the MT suit in the Wh and his stooges by going back back to the tried and true Hillarysentiment, "What difference does it make now anyway" or Ketchup Kerry, ""We Got A Lot More Important Things To Move On to"
What would the "weather" have to do with it?
Well, hell, don't you know that Bush was in control of the weather and brought the power of his office down upon the poor, black inhabitants of New Orleans with the Katrina hurricane?
nightlight88- Posts : 1680
Join date : 2012-12-25
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Twinkies Tue Apr 23, 2013 3:02 pm
nightlight88 wrote:BladeRunner wrote:Twinkies wrote:Do you think you know everything that went on during Bush's term or Regan's? Sometimes stuff is with held from the american public. Sometimes for valid points sometimes not. But do you really want the military/CIA to start deciding if they will do a mission on weather or not the public will find out about it.Skeptical wrote:I have no idea. And I never will. You either.
There we are folks,Twinks again showing loyalty to the MT suit in the Wh and his stooges by going back back to the tried and true Hillarysentiment, "What difference does it make now anyway" or Ketchup Kerry, ""We Got A Lot More Important Things To Move On to"
What would the "weather" have to do with it?
Well, hell, don't you know that Bush was in control of the weather and brought the power of his office down upon the poor, black inhabitants of New Orleans with the Katrina hurricane?
Thats true. I read it on Info Wars.
Twinkies- Posts : 389
Join date : 2013-03-19
Age : 79
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Freedom Forever Tue Apr 23, 2013 5:36 pm
Twinkies wrote:I have no idea. And I never will. You either.Freedom Forever wrote:Twinkies wrote:Do you even really know what happened in Benghazi? Sometimes in war things dont always happen as planned and people die. Are we going to make a big deal out of every time mistakes happen and US people die? Do you really want to set that precedence?Skeptical wrote:At present the one interesting input I want to see from Twinks are the answers to the questions he/she/it so strongly tries to avoid..
I am sure he/she/it recalls these from the "Kerry on Benghazi" thread.
Who were the culprits and what full measure of justice did they receive from the US for their actions?
Or is it just possible Hillary was the ring leader by saying, "What difference does it make now" after many months had elapsed with no action and this will the official stance in matters such as the like of Benghazi and/or Boston?.
So, what happened?
Probably best to let sleeping dogs lye.
Freedom Forever- Posts : 1123
Join date : 2013-01-14
Location : Yur Mom's House
Re: Examples of talking about the poster and not the topic--against GPLV Rules
Skeptical Tue Apr 23, 2013 6:45 pm
Twinkies wrote:Why do CONservatives make a deal out of the smallest things?BladeRunner wrote:Twinkies wrote:Do you think you know everything that went on during Bush's term or Regan's? Sometimes stuff is with held from the american public. Sometimes for valid points sometimes not. But do you really want the military/CIA to start deciding if they will do a mission on weather or not the public will find out about it.Skeptical wrote:I have no idea. And I never will. You either.
There we are folks,Twinks again showing loyalty to the MT suit in the Wh and his stooges by going back back to the tried and true Hillarysentiment, "What difference does it make now anyway" or Ketchup Kerry, ""We Got A Lot More Important Things To Move On to"
What would the "weather" have to do with it?
If wanting to know what is being done to bring to justice those who killed four and wounded many others in Benghazi or who is responsible for and what action being taken to those responsible for Fast and Furious as "worrying about the smallest things" as you say it then you are in sad shape.
Skeptical- Posts : 2932
Join date : 2012-12-26
Location : Right here
Sponsored content
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics» Another example of GPLV libs attacking a poster rather than discuss the topic
» Apparently it's OK for Mods at GPLV to go off topic
» Rules do not apply to everyone at GPLV
» Mass Shooting media isn't talking about.
» Just another 'what do you think' topic
» Apparently it's OK for Mods at GPLV to go off topic
» Rules do not apply to everyone at GPLV
» Mass Shooting media isn't talking about.
» Just another 'what do you think' topic
Page 1 of 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|