Pretty slow around here

nightlight88 wrote:

Shortie wrote:True Story:

Just because a forum has people who stick up for equal rights for the LBTG community, doesn't mean it's a "gay pride site."

And people who advocate for equal rights for the LBTG community are not necessarily gay.

**The only people who are adamantly anti-gay are either dumb or worried that dick tastes delicious.

(**Full disclosure: Totally paraphrased this stolen line from comedian Joe Rogan).

*sings* The more you knooooooow!

When a liberal or a sodomite says "true story", one better get ready to hear a BS story.

Good one, nightlight. You're a master of the burn.

nightlight88 wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Clicker wrote:Case in point is the USSR.  Their draconian overarching system of laws and intimidation kept the social scene there quite peaceful on the surface. This all changed when the USSR broke up.  The various factions resumed their old habits so quickly it was stunning.  Proof that even years and generations of political indoctrination and intimidation will not change belief systems.  Calling these mindsets childish is denial at its finest.  Liberals believe, not unlike the draconian actions of the Commies and Islamists, that belief systems can be changed by laws.  Not true.

Your knowledge of Soviet history is interesting. Stalin outlawed homosexuality making it punishable by five years of hard labor. Yeltsin legalized it after the Soviet union collapsed. Putin is bringing back the anti gay laws as part of his stated desire to return Russia to it's USSR style of government.

Which begs the question, which laws do you think are "draconian"? Stalin's laws regulating and criminalizing the most intimate details of a person's private life, Yeltsin's lack of such laws or Putin's efforts to stick the government's nose back into the bedrooms of it's citizens?

So called initmate parts of a person's private life are no longer that way.  Qu-eers need to go back into the closet.

Oh please. I 100% guarantee you are friends with a gay person and you don't even know it.

Just because they like butt sex doesn't mean you have to, nightlight. There's no need to be so judgy and dismissive. You need a hug or something.

nightlight88 wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Clicker wrote:Case in point is the USSR.  Their draconian overarching system of laws and intimidation kept the social scene there quite peaceful on the surface. This all changed when the USSR broke up.  The various factions resumed their old habits so quickly it was stunning.  Proof that even years and generations of political indoctrination and intimidation will not change belief systems.  Calling these mindsets childish is denial at its finest.  Liberals believe, not unlike the draconian actions of the Commies and Islamists, that belief systems can be changed by laws.  Not true.

Your knowledge of Soviet history is interesting. Stalin outlawed homosexuality making it punishable by five years of hard labor. Yeltsin legalized it after the Soviet union collapsed. Putin is bringing back the anti gay laws as part of his stated desire to return Russia to it's USSR style of government.

Which begs the question, which laws do you think are "draconian"? Stalin's laws regulating and criminalizing the most intimate details of a person's private life, Yeltsin's lack of such laws or Putin's efforts to stick the government's nose back into the bedrooms of it's citizens?

So called initmate parts of a person's life are no longer that way.  Qu-eers need to go back into the closet.

So your concept of governance aligns more with Stalin and Putin?

But I must say that your life must be so much more interesting than mine. I haven't witnessed the private moments of gay people but I have seen a few heterosexual couples copulating in public.

However, I will stand along side of you and condemn any and all public sex acts, there should be a law against sex in public.

Clicker wrote:

Paquette wrote:
Your knowledge of Soviet history is interesting. Stalin outlawed homosexuality making it punishable by five years of hard labor. Yeltsin legalized it after the Soviet union collapsed. Putin is bringing back the anti gay laws as part of his stated desire to return Russia to it's USSR style of government.

Which begs the question, which laws do you think are "draconian"? Stalin's laws regulating and criminalizing the most intimate details of a person's private life, Yeltsin's lack of such laws or Putin's efforts to stick the government's nose back into the bedrooms of it's citizens?

The comment is intended to hi-light the futility of iron fist laws that are intended to modify behaviour, not specific instances.  I picked on Russia because it is very hi-profile and shows the futility of trying to modify behaviour by laws.  The same thing has happened and continues to happen around the world as religious zealots displace dictators and democratic republics.  On the local front, here in the US the current regime is trying to outlaw guns by any means available but will fail miserably.  As BarryO said it so well in fustration, we will cling to our guns and religion, no matter what he does.

I'm sorry, I was under the mistaken impression that you were talking about the topic of this thread.

Skeptical wrote:

Liberal wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Liberal wrote:

Paquette wrote:Who is the admin here?

Whenever I've gotten banned or censored, I always get a note from the site's administrator. He even threatened to give out my personal address at one point.

Apparently you are referring to the time or times you were muted while on the Gay Pride Venue because I got threatened in the same way by the Admin or moderators over there when I got warnings

Why were you on a gay pride website?

Will wait two more days!
.

Oh goodie, today's the day. I can hardly wait for your big announcement.

Paquette wrote:

I'm sorry, I was under the mistaken impression that you were talking about the topic of this thread.

I was responding to your belief that certain behaviour is "childish" and should be grown out of. I think this is wrong, it takes cultural change to achieve change and is evolutionary in nature. Laws that attack that which many believe is a cultural or Constitutional right only serve to enrage and cause backlash. Laws and indoctrination have never been successful at causing permanent change. It's like a sinking boat, you need to stop the leak before bailing the boat to keep it from sinking. As I said before, my comments don't address a specific law or behaviour.

Clicker wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Clicker wrote:

Paquette wrote:
Your knowledge of Soviet history is interesting. Stalin outlawed homosexuality making it punishable by five years of hard labor. Yeltsin legalized it after the Soviet union collapsed. Putin is bringing back the anti gay laws as part of his stated desire to return Russia to it's USSR style of government.

Which begs the question, which laws do you think are "draconian"? Stalin's laws regulating and criminalizing the most intimate details of a person's private life, Yeltsin's lack of such laws or Putin's efforts to stick the government's nose back into the bedrooms of it's citizens?

The comment is intended to hi-light the futility of iron fist laws that are intended to modify behaviour, not specific instances.  I picked on Russia because it is very hi-profile and shows the futility of trying to modify behaviour by laws.  The same thing has happened and continues to happen around the world as religious zealots displace dictators and democratic republics.  On the local front, here in the US the current regime is trying to outlaw guns by any means available but will fail miserably.  As BarryO said it so well in fustration, we will cling to our guns and religion, no matter what he does.

I'm sorry, I was under the mistaken impression that you were talking about the topic of this thread.

Did you forget something?

Shortie wrote:True Story:

Just because a forum has people who stick up for equal rights for the LBTG community, doesn't mean it's a "gay pride site."

And people who advocate for equal rights for the LBTG community are not necessarily gay.

**The only people who are adamantly anti-gay are either dumb or worried that dick tastes delicious.

(**Full disclosure: Totally paraphrased this stolen line from comedian Joe Rogan).

*sings* The more you knooooooow!

That's it? That's your defense of same sex marriage? That in the end those who object to it are either stupid or homophobic? How small minded of you. Matches your physical stature.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Shortie wrote:True Story:

Just because a forum has people who stick up for equal rights for the LBTG community, doesn't mean it's a "gay pride site."

And people who advocate for equal rights for the LBTG community are not necessarily gay.

**The only people who are adamantly anti-gay are either dumb or worried that dick tastes delicious.

(**Full disclosure: Totally paraphrased this stolen line from comedian Joe Rogan).

*sings* The more you knooooooow!

That's it? That's your defense of same sex marriage? That in the end those who object to it are either stupid or homophobic?  How small minded of you. Matches your physical stature.

Personally, I don't think the individual people who hate homosexuals are dumb or homophobic. But the concept of hating homosexuals, in general, is stupid and homophobic.

I'd be interested in your thoughts on a "proclaimed" homosexual hater admitting to frequenting a gay pride website? Any thoughts on that?

Liberal wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Shortie wrote:True Story:

Just because a forum has people who stick up for equal rights for the LBTG community, doesn't mean it's a "gay pride site."

And people who advocate for equal rights for the LBTG community are not necessarily gay.

**The only people who are adamantly anti-gay are either dumb or worried that dick tastes delicious.

(**Full disclosure: Totally paraphrased this stolen line from comedian Joe Rogan).

*sings* The more you knooooooow!

That's it? That's your defense of same sex marriage? That in the end those who object to it are either stupid or homophobic?  How small minded of you. Matches your physical stature.

Personally, I don't think the individual people who hate homosexuals are dumb or homophobic. But the concept of hating homosexuals, in general, is stupid and homophobic.

I'd be interested in your thoughts on a "proclaimed" homosexual hater admitting to frequenting a gay pride website? Any thoughts on that?

The only thing you have left out in your post is accusing someone of being racist.

Shortie wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Clicker wrote:Case in point is the USSR.  Their draconian overarching system of laws and intimidation kept the social scene there quite peaceful on the surface. This all changed when the USSR broke up.  The various factions resumed their old habits so quickly it was stunning.  Proof that even years and generations of political indoctrination and intimidation will not change belief systems.  Calling these mindsets childish is denial at its finest.  Liberals believe, not unlike the draconian actions of the Commies and Islamists, that belief systems can be changed by laws.  Not true.

Your knowledge of Soviet history is interesting. Stalin outlawed homosexuality making it punishable by five years of hard labor. Yeltsin legalized it after the Soviet union collapsed. Putin is bringing back the anti gay laws as part of his stated desire to return Russia to it's USSR style of government.

Which begs the question, which laws do you think are "draconian"? Stalin's laws regulating and criminalizing the most intimate details of a person's private life, Yeltsin's lack of such laws or Putin's efforts to stick the government's nose back into the bedrooms of it's citizens?

So called initmate parts of a person's private life are no longer that way.  Qu-eers need to go back into the closet.

Oh please. I 100% guarantee you are friends with a gay person and you don't even know it.

Just because they like butt sex doesn't mean you have to, nightlight. There's no need to be so judgy and dismissive. You need a hug or something.

Oh Shortie we've already had this convo with the boys here on JSI. About the 'people you know'. Maybe even the 'person that you are' (I think at least one of these guys is gay, but afraid to reveal it to all the good ol' boys of JSI).

Good luck with giving the hug to nighltight88.

Shortie wrote:True Story:

Just because a forum has people who stick up for equal rights for the LBTG community, doesn't mean it's a "gay pride site."

And people who advocate for equal rights for the LBTG community are not necessarily gay.

**The only people who are adamantly anti-gay are either dumb or worried that dick tastes delicious.

(**Full disclosure: Totally paraphrased this stolen line from comedian Joe Rogan).

*sings* The more you knooooooow!

Dick ? Delicious ? The only worrying that these fella's need to overcome is how to please a lady. No clue. Only objectification. You just go ahead and be all nice to them and let them objectify you.

Hey fellas cunni really does taste like honey.

Liberal wrote:

Shortie wrote:True Story:

Just because a forum has people who stick up for equal rights for the LBTG community, doesn't mean it's a "gay pride site."

And people who advocate for equal rights for the LBTG community are not necessarily gay.

**The only people who are adamantly anti-gay are either dumb or worried that dick tastes delicious.

(**Full disclosure: Totally paraphrased this stolen line from comedian Joe Rogan).

*sings* The more you knooooooow!

Just out of curiosity, do penises all have the same taste in general like vaginas do? Obviously, I'd imagine, like vaginas, that grooming plays a big role but I was just wondering in a general sense.

Thanks!

There is a question which hasn't been answered. Anyone ? Boys ?

Liberal wrote:

Shortie wrote:True Story:

Just because a forum has people who stick up for equal rights for the LBTG community, doesn't mean it's a "gay pride site."

And people who advocate for equal rights for the LBTG community are not necessarily gay.

**The only people who are adamantly anti-gay are either dumb or worried that dick tastes delicious.

(**Full disclosure: Totally paraphrased this stolen line from comedian Joe Rogan).

*sings* The more you knooooooow!

Just out of curiosity, do penises all have the same taste in general like vaginas do? Obviously, I'd imagine, like vaginas, that grooming plays a big role but I was just wondering in a general sense.

Thanks!

Oh Liberal I think you already know the answer to this about the v'yaa'yaa but diet prolly more important than grooming or hygiene unless there is complete filth. Love indian food but don't like the intimacy results. Same with asparagus.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Shortie wrote:True Story:

Just because a forum has people who stick up for equal rights for the LBTG community, doesn't mean it's a "gay pride site."

And people who advocate for equal rights for the LBTG community are not necessarily gay.

**The only people who are adamantly anti-gay are either dumb or worried that dick tastes delicious.

(**Full disclosure: Totally paraphrased this stolen line from comedian Joe Rogan).

*sings* The more you knooooooow!

That's it? That's your defense of same sex marriage? That in the end those who object to it are either stupid or homophobic?  How small minded of you. Matches your physical stature.

Oh, hell no. That's just the tip, darling.

Liberal wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Shortie wrote:True Story:

Just because a forum has people who stick up for equal rights for the LBTG community, doesn't mean it's a "gay pride site."

And people who advocate for equal rights for the LBTG community are not necessarily gay.

**The only people who are adamantly anti-gay are either dumb or worried that dick tastes delicious.

(**Full disclosure: Totally paraphrased this stolen line from comedian Joe Rogan).

*sings* The more you knooooooow!

That's it? That's your defense of same sex marriage? That in the end those who object to it are either stupid or homophobic?  How small minded of you. Matches your physical stature.

Personally, I don't think the individual people who hate homosexuals are dumb or homophobic. But the concept of hating homosexuals, in general, is stupid and homophobic.

I'd be interested in your thoughts on a "proclaimed" homosexual hater admitting to frequenting a gay pride website? Any thoughts on that?

I just really like that Joe Rogan quote. But no, people who are anti-homosexuality aren't dumb. They are, however, ignorant. They think there is something to dislike, but there's simply not. They were raised to believe it, so they have decided that all homosexuals are bad, instead of judging people on a person-by-person basis. They were also raised to give a f*ck what other people do in their bedrooms, which is so strange to me. Everybody has a certain level of depravity in their sex lives, and it's not anyone else's concern as long as no one involved is being harmed. Especially since depravity means a lot of different things to a lot of different people!

As far as your other question, Great Plains Voices, or GVP, was just a forum, just like this one. There just happened to be a lot of people there who were gay rights advocates, so these fellas decided it was a gay pride site. Which is cool. No big deal. It doesn't even exist anymore, so I don't know why they bring it up so much.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perversion

And there is a variant of the word for the person who practices prevision.

Jammer wrote:http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perversion

And there is a variant of the word for the person who practices prevision.

Um...a pervert?

What equals perversion?

*whispers* Is it the butt sex?

Because if so, there's a f*ck ton of perverts out there, and whole lot of them are straight.

And it's also a moot point because it's none of our business who likes to what what, up the butt anyway.

Shortie wrote:

Jammer wrote:http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perversion

And there is a variant of the word for the person who practices prevision.

Um...a pervert?

What equals perversion?

*whispers* Is it the butt sex?

Because if so, there's a f*ck ton of perverts out there, and whole lot of them are straight.

And it's also a moot point because it's none of our business who likes to what what, up the butt anyway.

Obviously spoken by one of the so-called "ton of them".

Oh oh, somebody is wearing "space panties" .

Jammer wrote:

Shortie wrote:

Jammer wrote:http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perversion

And there is a variant of the word for the person who practices prevision.

Um...a pervert?

What equals perversion?

*whispers* Is it the butt sex?

Because if so, there's a f*ck ton of perverts out there, and whole lot of them are straight.

And it's also a moot point because it's none of our business who likes to what what, up the butt anyway.

Obviously spoken by one of the so-called "ton of them".

Says the guy who didn't say he WASN'T one of the so-called "ton of them!" Which obviously means YOU'RE totally into it! Not necessarily with dudes, but with your wife or girlfriend, or your mom, or whomever you prefer to have intimate time with.

(See I can make irrational sweeping judgements as well! You're teaching me so much, Jammer! Thank you!)

Skeptical wrote:
Oh oh, somebody is wearing "space panties" .

Space panties?

Just like an SR-71 Blackbird !!

Shortie wrote:

Jammer wrote:http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perversion

And there is a variant of the word for the person who practices prevision.

Um...a pervert?

What equals perversion?

*whispers* Is it the butt sex?

Because if so, there's a f*ck ton of perverts out there, and whole lot of them are straight.

And it's also a moot point because it's none of our business who likes to what what, up the butt anyway.

You keep believing honey...maybe they would rather be with a man and use you in a pinch.

Nothin says love then taking it up the azz, /liberal

Darth Cheney wrote:

Shortie wrote:

Jammer wrote:http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perversion

And there is a variant of the word for the person who practices prevision.

Um...a pervert?

What equals perversion?

*whispers* Is it the butt sex?

Because if so, there's a f*ck ton of perverts out there, and whole lot of them are straight.

And it's also a moot point because it's none of our business who likes to what what, up the butt anyway.

You keep believing honey...maybe they would rather be with a man and use you in a pinch.

Nothin says love then taking it up the azz, /liberal

Most homosexuals are losers, unsuccessful people that have never been able to accomplish anything in their lives.  87% of all homosexuals have consciously resorted to homosexuality because they were unable to secure a partnership with a person of the opposite sex.  The whole thing about being born that way is merely a cover-up for the real reason.