Name that liberal sin

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Other than a non-belief in a supernatural being...

Do you believe in a "supernatural being"?

Shortie's Lover wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Shortie's Lover wrote:So all you boys will be OK with the Siouxland Freethinkers to erect a non-governmental-type of statue at the County Government Center to honor their beliefs.

Other than a non-belief in a supernatural being, maybe you can elucidate on these "beliefs" that the Freethinkers share.  And why a non-governmental statue? I would assume Freethinkers would be more concerned about it being secular rather than non-governmental. And why a statue? Wouldn't a sculpture suffice? Maybe a bust? How about a doormat?

Gomezz you will have to take up the governemnt / non governement thing with nightlight88.  nightlight88 indicated that these were not governement monuments.

AFA the type. I would guess that statues, sculptures and busts would be OK.  Plaques, no.  And certainly not door mats.

Nightlight mentioned that they were not government monuments in response to Liberal's lies that somehow the placing of a religious display in the public square is tantamount to a governmental approval and/or ownership of that display.

And how would like such a display of non-belief to appear? Maybe a bronzed open book of Harry Potter? No, wait, Harry was a supernatural wizard and Freethinkers don't believe in the supernatural.

Paquette wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Other than a non-belief in a supernatural being...

Do you believe in a "supernatural being"?

Why is that important? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Other than a non-belief in a supernatural being...

Do you believe in a "supernatural being"?

Why is that important? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

If you don't want to answer, I understand. It's just that other people's faith seems to be a favorite topic in here and I didn't want you to feel left out.

Paquette wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Other than a non-belief in a supernatural being...

Do you believe in a "supernatural being"?

Why is that important? What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

If you don't want to answer, I understand. It's just that other people's faith seems to be a favorite topic in here and I didn't want you to feel left out.

Nah, one of our favorite topics is pointing out lame brain liberal thinking, oooops, i meant liberal emotionalism

Jammer wrote:Thanks to a little help from my friends, the list is now up to 14 progressive liberal sins.  Feel free to keep adding.  Also feel free to offer any suggestions for possible "wordsmithing" of the various items.  It never hurts to polish things up so people can better understand them.

I personally intend at some point to print this document and hand it out to people.  It is time the world knows who these evil people are and what they have done to this country.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The progressive liberals have wrought incredible devastation on this country with their sins.  It is probably worth our effort to list these sins so that we can later share them with our children and grandchildren.  This probably has the most value when we point these evil people out when we see them in our neighborhoods and on the street.  Our children and grandchildren need to know just who these evil people are that have robbed them of so much.

I will start a list of these progressive liberal sins.  Please feel free to add to the list or expand on the narrative on any of the individual sins.  I have a feeling when the list is completely compiled we will be asking ourselves are these progressive liberals really the devil?

1.  Destroyed the traditional family:  Liberal policies and principles have almost completely destroyed the traditional family in America.  This decline correlates directly with our increase in poverty and decline of our educational system.

2.  Destroying the system of free market capitalism:  Free market capitalism is the only real source of prosperity.  However, the progressive liberals are insistent on tearing it apart and replacing it with socialism.

3.  Loss of property rights:  Progressive liberals for over a century have been trying to redistribute wealth with their policies and programs right out of the Communist Manifesto.  Their leader insists that hard working Americans who have built businesses really didn't by shouting "You didn't build that".

4.  Loss of virtue in this country:   When the progressive liberals removed God from our schools and society, they have really removed virtue from our country.

5.  Created class warfare:   What was once the Great Melting Pot of America has become a hot bed of hatred thanks to progressive liberals and their demands for diversity.  Instead of people from all over the world coming to America for opportunity and becoming an AMERICAN, everything from political correctness to the Occupy Wall Street movement has been used to divide us.

6.  Loss of our national sovereignty:   In their lust for power, the progressive liberals have thrown open our borders to anyone who they think will help keep them in power.  They have made a mockery of citizenship in this country and the good people who followed the rules to become citizens.

7.   Loss of national security:  From appeasing our enemies to alienating our allies to dismantling our military, the progressive liberals have put this country in a perilous position.  Our national security is no longer secure.

8.  Destroyed our educational system:  The progressive liberals took an educational system that was once the envy of the world and destroyed it to the point that we are near the middle of any measurement system used to measure education effectiveness.  

9.  Perpetuation of slavery:  The democrats who were the forerunners of today's progressive liberals fought to keep slavery through the Civil War and they fought to prevent passage of the 13th and 15th Amendments as well as the Civil Rights Act.  Finally they realized that they had lost that battle so they changed strategies and created their federal welfare programs which do nothing but keep the black and the poor in slavery to the democrat party.  As shameful as this is, the most shameful thing is that few Americans realize this.

10.  Robbing our children and grandchildren to pay for their greed today:  Progressive liberals are greedy people with insatiable lust for things they can't afford.  Therefore they spend and borrow to pay for it charging the debt for their evil ways to be paid for by future generations.

11. Robbing America of millions of children and grandchildren:    Thanks to progressive liberals and their evil intent, a woman through the so-called process of freedom of "choice" can do what she wants with "her" body even if it causes the death of a preborn child.

12.   Removed God from America:    Progressive liberals have replaced freedom of religion with freedom FROM religion.  They have totally screwed up the true meaning of the separation between church and state.   It was never intended to mean what they say it means through their distortion and lying.  As a result they have not only removed God from America, but they are removing virtue from our society.

13.  Eroded our democracy by destroying the American Free Press:  True democracy requires a free press.  Therefore, progressive liberals have hijacked the press/media, forcing them to report only what they deem proper with their version of the "truth".      Rather than reporting the news, they turn the news into a cause and in some cases a crusade to support their socialist agenda.

14.  Fundamentally changed our country from a country where all mankind is created equal, to a society based on classes:   Progressive liberals have consistently advocated their existence as an elitist element in our society.   It will only be a few decades before they establish royalty in this country and it will be our jobs as peasants to keep them in luxury.

You guys are so funny. And paranoid. But mostly funny.

1. Destroyed the traditional family: What policies have destroyed the traditional family? Wait, I have a better question, what qualifies as a traditional family? I really need to know your definition on this one before we can dissect how it's been ruined.

2. Destroying the system of free market capitalism: I'm afraid I need more information again. How has free market capitalism been destroyed at all? Besides how hard it is for me to get a decent knock off designer purse on the streets of NYC when I visit because of the crackdown on copyright infringement in the designer world? (It's totally justified, but that doesn't mean I'm not still sad about it).

Oh and I guess there's that whole thing where liberals are  out to demolish discrimination laws like the one just passed in Indiana to protect the LBTG community from being denied goods and services simply because of who they are. But I'll totally stand by that one, because people who support that sh*t are just awful. Is that the kind of stuff you're talking about?

3.  Loss of property rights: The only people I've seen lose their rights to property in my lifetime are small business owners who get taxed to hell (and let's face facts here, the responsibly for that bullshit belongs to ALL politicians across the board who are looking out for their big business campaign contributors) and people who couldn't pay their mortgages, and we can thank the greedy bastards on Wall Street for that crap. They f*cked over the whole damn country with their shenanigans.

4. Loss of virtue in this country:  When did this happen exactly, because I graduated from high school almost 14 years ago now, and there was never any God besides the "under God" in the pledge, in ANY of my schooling. How does God in school = virtue? That is what church is for. If you want God in the classroom, that is what private school is for. How do you even measure loss of virtue for an entire country? Different doesn't equal loss of virtue. It just means it's different. Unless we're talking about teenagers on social media. They could use a little virtue. But I blame parents for that crap.

5. Created class warfare: I hardly see how the very stupid and poorly organized Occupy Wall Street movement qualifies as liberals creating class warfare. It was disorganized people protesting. Even if you don't agree with a protest, you're just being elitist if you don't at least respect it, especially if they're being peaceful about it. It's in the constitution, after all. Class warfare has always been a thing. ALWAYS. Liberals didn't invent it. Humans did.

6. Loss of our national sovereignty: You're deluding yourself if you think you can sum up the nation's very difficult and complex issues with immigration with a few sentences in a blurb and place all blame on one side of the fence. C'mon now. You're smarter than that.

7. Loss of national security: First of all, we still have the most insanely huge armed forces in the entire world. As far as attacks on this country go, you're deluding yourself if you think you can sum up the nation's very difficult and complex issues with national security and foreign affairs with a few sentences in a blurb and place all blame on one side of the fence. C'mon now. You're smarter than that. (Yes, I just copied the answer I gave for #6 and changed the subject of the sentence. Because the same sentiment applied).

8. Destroyed our educational system: I need some specific examples, please. The entire blurb was too vague. Even without you giving me examples, I would argue that this country's greatest problem with the educational system is that it is focused on testing instead of learning. And also the fact that when kids get bad grades, the helicopter parenting generation blames teachers instead of their own children. And both Republican and Democrat parents pull that sh*t all the time. I have seen it with mine own two eyes.

9. Perpetuation of slavery: Seriously, dude? You can't expect to have intelligent discourse if you're being so God damn melodramatic. Welfare = slavery? Really? So we should eradicate welfare and "free the people?" Yeah, there'd be no fall out of starving children or desperate single mothers or more homeless vets or hungry elderly or anything at all.

There are obviously welfare issues that need addressing. It's not drug testing. That proved to be worthless and freaking expensive to boot. But understanding that welfare in this country is needed is not me promoting slavery. Obviously there needs to be reforms to stop people from abusing the system. Once again, such complicated and complex issues that cannot be summed up so succinctly.

10. Robbing our children and grandchildren to pay for their greed today: Really? JUST liberals are greedy and like to buy things they don't need? JUST liberals? You know that book the Bible? Well it talks about seven deadly sins, and greed is one of them. FUN FACT: When the Bible was written, being a liberal or a conservative wasn't even a thing yet! Greed is another one those things that is a human problem. Nearly all humans contribute to the greed problem, and most certainly, ALL politicians in office do, no matter where they fall on the political spectrum. Once again, you want to blame one side, but it's not that simple.

11. Robbing America of millions of children and grandchildren:   Do you really think there aren't enough people in this country and that's why abortion should be banned? I thought the greedy liberals had too many children with their non-virtuous sex and that's why they insist on slavery welfare to steal money from your pocket and feed all of their greedy little children in their non-traditional families and that they needed to be stopped? You need to be more consistent in your grievances.

12. Removed God from America:   Oh don't worry. God didn't go anywhere. He's still here. I just thanked him last time I had non-virtuous pre-marital sex.

But in all seriousness, I believe in God, but I don't want to hear about him all the time, and I certainly don't want to hear about how religion is sooooo put upon in this country, because it's such bullsh*t. It's just an excuse for some people to have a persecution complex. "Oh you were discriminated against because you're black/gay/a women, ect? Well, I told someone to say Merry Christmas instead of Happy Holidays and they rolled their eyes at me! See, I'm discriminated against too!"

13. Eroded our democracy by destroying the American Free Press: Oh cripes. The 24 hour news circuit is just television entertainment masquerading as news at this point and if you think FOX news is any better than CNN than you are living in a dream world. It's all crap.

14. Fundamentally changed our country from a country where all mankind is created equal, to a society based on classes: Honestly, with this one, you're just saying the same stuff you already said. You just packaged it a little differently.

Whew! That was fun. I can't wait for the bombardment of haters in this little circle jerk. But don't kid yourself. You love that I finally made an appearance here. C'mon...admit it. A forum is just no fun when everyone agrees with you. Takes out all the fun of it. Try to resist name calling though, lovlies. A little shade is okay, but all out character assassination is why GPV was forced to force you out in the first place. You can be adults. I'm just sure of it.

Ciao.

Shortie wrote:3.  Loss of property rights: The only people I've seen lose their rights to property in my lifetime are small business owners who get taxed to hell (and let's face facts here, the responsibly for that bullshit belongs to ALL politicians across the board who are looking out for their big business campaign contributors) and people who couldn't pay their mortgages, and we can thank the greedy bastards on Wall Street for that crap. They f*cked over the whole damn country with their shenanigans.

Don't forget foreign countries being allowed to use eminent domain to take our property.

Shortie wrote:Last edited by Shortie on Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:17 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : EDIT: I can't use an occasional swear word without it automatically being edited? Tsk Tsk. That's not very nice for my free speech. I expected better from you, JSI!)

You will be told that it is the forum software that is to blame for the censorship. What they won't tell you is that the forum administrator has full control over that software and can completely disable it. Obviously the administrator is a fan of censorship and has chosen to keep it active.

Paquette wrote:

Shortie wrote:Last edited by Shortie on Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:17 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : EDIT: I can't use an occasional swear word without it automatically being edited? Tsk Tsk. That's not very nice for my free speech. I expected better from you, JSI!)

You will be told that it is the forum software that is to blame for the censorship. What they won't tell you is that the forum administrator has full control over that software and can completely disable it. Obviously the administrator is a fan of censorship and has chosen to keep it active.

Haha. Yes, I saw that after exploring the site a bit more, but thank you nonetheless! What a silly excuse. I'm sure there are plenty of other forums out there using this software that have managed to change the default settings with little to no effort.

Paquette wrote:

Shortie wrote:3.  Loss of property rights: The only people I've seen lose their rights to property in my lifetime are small business owners who get taxed to hell (and let's face facts here, the responsibly for that bullshit belongs to ALL politicians across the board who are looking out for their big business campaign contributors) and people who couldn't pay their mortgages, and we can thank the greedy bastards on Wall Street for that crap. They f*cked over the whole damn country with their shenanigans.

Don't forget foreign countries being allowed to use eminent domain to take our property.

You people are totally clueless or the biggest liars in the world or both.  I repeat to my conservative brethren that it is a complete waste of time to discuss any issue with you closed minded cretins.  

The list of property rights that have been destroyed is very long.  However, when you don't recognize some of the most obvious, then why should anybody spend a minute of their time with you cretins?  If you think a GOVERNMENT redistributing wealth is not a huge loss of property rights or if you think a progressive income tax that does NOT treat all citizen's property EQUALLY is a loss of property rights, then it is fruitless to discuss anything with such a closed minded Neanderthal.

Conservatives, if you want a good use of your time I suggest that rather than arguing with these brick walls go down to WalMart and spit in the faces of the progressive liberals spending American tax dollars with their ill gotten EBT cards.

Jammer wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Shortie wrote:3.  Loss of property rights: The only people I've seen lose their rights to property in my lifetime are small business owners who get taxed to hell (and let's face facts here, the responsibly for that bullshit belongs to ALL politicians across the board who are looking out for their big business campaign contributors) and people who couldn't pay their mortgages, and we can thank the greedy bastards on Wall Street for that crap. They f*cked over the whole damn country with their shenanigans.

Don't forget foreign countries being allowed to use eminent domain to take our property.

You people are totally clueless or the biggest liars in the world or both.  I repeat to my conservative brethren that it is a complete waste of time to discuss any issue with you closed minded cretins.  

The list of property rights that have been destroyed is very long.  However, when you don't recognize some of the most obvious, then why should anybody spend a minute of their time with you cretins?  If you think a GOVERNMENT redistributing wealth is not a huge loss of property rights or if you think a progressive income tax that does NOT treat all citizen's property EQUALLY is a loss of property rights, then it is fruitless to discuss anything with such a closed minded Neanderthal.

Conservatives, if you want a good use of your time I suggest that rather than arguing with these brick walls go down to WalMart and spit in the faces of the progressive liberals spending American tax dollars with their ill gotten EBT cards.

You don't have a problem with foreigners using eminent domain against American citizens' property?

Jammer wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Shortie wrote:3.  Loss of property rights: The only people I've seen lose their rights to property in my lifetime are small business owners who get taxed to hell (and let's face facts here, the responsibly for that bullshit belongs to ALL politicians across the board who are looking out for their big business campaign contributors) and people who couldn't pay their mortgages, and we can thank the greedy bastards on Wall Street for that crap. They f*cked over the whole damn country with their shenanigans.

Don't forget foreign countries being allowed to use eminent domain to take our property.

You people are totally clueless or the biggest liars in the world or both.  I repeat to my conservative brethren that it is a complete waste of time to discuss any issue with you closed minded cretins.  

The list of property rights that have been destroyed is very long.  However, when you don't recognize some of the most obvious, then why should anybody spend a minute of their time with you cretins?  If you think a GOVERNMENT redistributing wealth is not a huge loss of property rights or if you think a progressive income tax that does NOT treat all citizen's property EQUALLY is a loss of property rights, then it is fruitless to discuss anything with such a closed minded Neanderthal.

Conservatives, if you want a good use of your time I suggest that rather than arguing with these brick walls go down to WalMart and spit in the faces of the progressive liberals spending American tax dollars with their ill gotten EBT cards.

Aww...really? All of that time and effort into my initial debate of your points, and this is your only little response? You really don't like to debate, do you? I think you just prefer to spout your opinion and have your like-minded fellows give you the Internet equivalent of a slow clap.

So disappointing...

Serious question though. Do you consider money/wealth to be property? I mean, I suppose I see the logic. But if that is the case, why do we have a separate word for it? I'm being totally serious. If you consider wealth to be property and believe that a graduated income tax, or "wealth distribution," as you say, is lost property, then why is the term wealth distribution used and not the term property distribution? Perhaps I'm being a little too black and white here, but "wealth" can be a little subjective, whereas I feel "property" is much more tangible, hence why I responded the way I did.

I'm legit willing to be enlightened here.

Shortie wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Shortie wrote:3.  Loss of property rights: The only people I've seen lose their rights to property in my lifetime are small business owners who get taxed to hell (and let's face facts here, the responsibly for that bullshit belongs to ALL politicians across the board who are looking out for their big business campaign contributors) and people who couldn't pay their mortgages, and we can thank the greedy bastards on Wall Street for that crap. They f*cked over the whole damn country with their shenanigans.

Don't forget foreign countries being allowed to use eminent domain to take our property.

You people are totally clueless or the biggest liars in the world or both.  I repeat to my conservative brethren that it is a complete waste of time to discuss any issue with you closed minded cretins.  

The list of property rights that have been destroyed is very long.  However, when you don't recognize some of the most obvious, then why should anybody spend a minute of their time with you cretins?  If you think a GOVERNMENT redistributing wealth is not a huge loss of property rights or if you think a progressive income tax that does NOT treat all citizen's property EQUALLY is a loss of property rights, then it is fruitless to discuss anything with such a closed minded Neanderthal.

Conservatives, if you want a good use of your time I suggest that rather than arguing with these brick walls go down to WalMart and spit in the faces of the progressive liberals spending American tax dollars with their ill gotten EBT cards.

Aww...really? All of that time and effort into my initial debate of your points, and this is your only little response? You really don't like to debate, do you? I think you just prefer to spout your opinion and have your like-minded fellows give you the Internet equivalent of a slow clap.

So disappointing...

Serious question though. Do you consider money/wealth to be property? I mean, I suppose I see the logic. But if that is the case, why do we have a separate word for it? I'm being totally serious. If you consider wealth to be property and believe that a graduated income tax, or "wealth distribution," as you say, is lost property, then why is the term wealth distribution used and not the term property distribution? Perhaps I'm being a little too black and white here, but "wealth" can be a little subjective, whereas I feel "property" is much more tangible, hence why I responded the way I did.

I'm legit willing to be enlightened here.

Cretin, ignoramus, bonehead, idiot, liberal

different words, all mean the same thing

nightlight88 wrote:

Shortie wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Shortie wrote:3.  Loss of property rights: The only people I've seen lose their rights to property in my lifetime are small business owners who get taxed to hell (and let's face facts here, the responsibly for that bullshit belongs to ALL politicians across the board who are looking out for their big business campaign contributors) and people who couldn't pay their mortgages, and we can thank the greedy bastards on Wall Street for that crap. They f*cked over the whole damn country with their shenanigans.

Don't forget foreign countries being allowed to use eminent domain to take our property.

You people are totally clueless or the biggest liars in the world or both.  I repeat to my conservative brethren that it is a complete waste of time to discuss any issue with you closed minded cretins.  

The list of property rights that have been destroyed is very long.  However, when you don't recognize some of the most obvious, then why should anybody spend a minute of their time with you cretins?  If you think a GOVERNMENT redistributing wealth is not a huge loss of property rights or if you think a progressive income tax that does NOT treat all citizen's property EQUALLY is a loss of property rights, then it is fruitless to discuss anything with such a closed minded Neanderthal.

Conservatives, if you want a good use of your time I suggest that rather than arguing with these brick walls go down to WalMart and spit in the faces of the progressive liberals spending American tax dollars with their ill gotten EBT cards.

Aww...really? All of that time and effort into my initial debate of your points, and this is your only little response? You really don't like to debate, do you? I think you just prefer to spout your opinion and have your like-minded fellows give you the Internet equivalent of a slow clap.

So disappointing...

Serious question though. Do you consider money/wealth to be property? I mean, I suppose I see the logic. But if that is the case, why do we have a separate word for it? I'm being totally serious. If you consider wealth to be property and believe that a graduated income tax, or "wealth distribution," as you say, is lost property, then why is the term wealth distribution used and not the term property distribution? Perhaps I'm being a little too black and white here, but "wealth" can be a little subjective, whereas I feel "property" is much more tangible, hence why I responded the way I did.

I'm legit willing to be enlightened here.

Cretin, ignoramus, bonehead, idiot, liberal

different words, all mean the same thing

You are 100% accurate and there is ZERO value in engaging in any discussions with these evil scum.

Facts, data, logic, reason and commonsense are all trumped by how a dumbass progressive liberal FEELS about an issue. They are worthless to society and they should be branded and treated accordingly.

Jammer wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:

Shortie wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Shortie wrote:3.  Loss of property rights: The only people I've seen lose their rights to property in my lifetime are small business owners who get taxed to hell (and let's face facts here, the responsibly for that bullshit belongs to ALL politicians across the board who are looking out for their big business campaign contributors) and people who couldn't pay their mortgages, and we can thank the greedy bastards on Wall Street for that crap. They f*cked over the whole damn country with their shenanigans.

Don't forget foreign countries being allowed to use eminent domain to take our property.

You people are totally clueless or the biggest liars in the world or both.  I repeat to my conservative brethren that it is a complete waste of time to discuss any issue with you closed minded cretins.  

The list of property rights that have been destroyed is very long.  However, when you don't recognize some of the most obvious, then why should anybody spend a minute of their time with you cretins?  If you think a GOVERNMENT redistributing wealth is not a huge loss of property rights or if you think a progressive income tax that does NOT treat all citizen's property EQUALLY is a loss of property rights, then it is fruitless to discuss anything with such a closed minded Neanderthal.

Conservatives, if you want a good use of your time I suggest that rather than arguing with these brick walls go down to WalMart and spit in the faces of the progressive liberals spending American tax dollars with their ill gotten EBT cards.

Aww...really? All of that time and effort into my initial debate of your points, and this is your only little response? You really don't like to debate, do you? I think you just prefer to spout your opinion and have your like-minded fellows give you the Internet equivalent of a slow clap.

So disappointing...

Serious question though. Do you consider money/wealth to be property? I mean, I suppose I see the logic. But if that is the case, why do we have a separate word for it? I'm being totally serious. If you consider wealth to be property and believe that a graduated income tax, or "wealth distribution," as you say, is lost property, then why is the term wealth distribution used and not the term property distribution? Perhaps I'm being a little too black and white here, but "wealth" can be a little subjective, whereas I feel "property" is much more tangible, hence why I responded the way I did.

I'm legit willing to be enlightened here.

Cretin, ignoramus, bonehead, idiot, liberal

different words, all mean the same thing

You are 100% accurate and there is ZERO value in engaging in any discussions with these evil scum.  

Facts, data, logic, reason and commonsense are all trumped by how a dumbass progressive liberal FEELS about an issue.  They are worthless to society and they should be branded and treated accordingly.

Emotion, sensitivity, fanaticism, and tear-jerking are all infused into the way a dumbass progressive liberal FEELS about an issue. They are worthless to society and they should be branded and treated accordingly.


Fixed it for you, no thanks needed.

nightlight88 wrote:

Jammer wrote:

nightlight88 wrote:

Shortie wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Shortie wrote:3.  Loss of property rights: The only people I've seen lose their rights to property in my lifetime are small business owners who get taxed to hell (and let's face facts here, the responsibly for that bullshit belongs to ALL politicians across the board who are looking out for their big business campaign contributors) and people who couldn't pay their mortgages, and we can thank the greedy bastards on Wall Street for that crap. They f*cked over the whole damn country with their shenanigans.

Don't forget foreign countries being allowed to use eminent domain to take our property.

You people are totally clueless or the biggest liars in the world or both.  I repeat to my conservative brethren that it is a complete waste of time to discuss any issue with you closed minded cretins.  

The list of property rights that have been destroyed is very long.  However, when you don't recognize some of the most obvious, then why should anybody spend a minute of their time with you cretins?  If you think a GOVERNMENT redistributing wealth is not a huge loss of property rights or if you think a progressive income tax that does NOT treat all citizen's property EQUALLY is a loss of property rights, then it is fruitless to discuss anything with such a closed minded Neanderthal.

Conservatives, if you want a good use of your time I suggest that rather than arguing with these brick walls go down to WalMart and spit in the faces of the progressive liberals spending American tax dollars with their ill gotten EBT cards.

Aww...really? All of that time and effort into my initial debate of your points, and this is your only little response? You really don't like to debate, do you? I think you just prefer to spout your opinion and have your like-minded fellows give you the Internet equivalent of a slow clap.

So disappointing...

Serious question though. Do you consider money/wealth to be property? I mean, I suppose I see the logic. But if that is the case, why do we have a separate word for it? I'm being totally serious. If you consider wealth to be property and believe that a graduated income tax, or "wealth distribution," as you say, is lost property, then why is the term wealth distribution used and not the term property distribution? Perhaps I'm being a little too black and white here, but "wealth" can be a little subjective, whereas I feel "property" is much more tangible, hence why I responded the way I did.

I'm legit willing to be enlightened here.

Cretin, ignoramus, bonehead, idiot, liberal

different words, all mean the same thing

You are 100% accurate and there is ZERO value in engaging in any discussions with these evil scum.  

Facts, data, logic, reason and commonsense are all trumped by how a dumbass progressive liberal FEELS about an issue.  They are worthless to society and they should be branded and treated accordingly.

Emotion, sensitivity, fanaticism, and tear-jerking are all infused into the way a dumbass progressive liberal FEELS about an issue.  They are worthless to society and they should be branded and treated accordingly.


Fixed it for you, no thanks needed.

Just consider the futility in spending one single minute discussing property rights with a progressive liberal slut who doesn't consider wealth to be property. There is no hope as these people cannot be rehabilitated, progressive liberalism must be eliminated in this country or we are doomed.

I'm sure that Jesus is very proud of us all after reading this.

Liberal wrote:I'm sure that Jesus is very proud of us all after reading this.

He would be proud of us speaking the truth.

Soo...no discussion then? Just going to call me a slut and a string of other names and that's it? How very educated of you both.

I haven't called you any names, beyond saying that I thought you were being delusional about some issues, but hey, that's my fault for thinking this place was frequented by grownups. Adults. How silly of me.

nightlight88 wrote:

Liberal wrote:I'm sure that Jesus is very proud of us all after reading this.

He would be proud of us speaking the truth.  

I see very little truth in this thread, but there are lots of opinions.

Here's my summation of my time in this thread:

Guys: "Indignation! Mad about stuff! Liberals are responsible for dead puppies, tsunamis, hangnails, diaper rash, mosquito bites, and all other things bad."

Me: "Oh hai guys. I registered! I just have a few fellow up questions for you about your stance on all these issues and a few opinions of my own. I responded fully to each one of your points. Let's have a convo!"

Guys: "idiot liberal cretin slut!"

Shortie wrote:Soo...no discussion then? Just going to call me a slut and a string of other names and that's it? How very educated of you both.

I haven't called you any names, beyond saying that I thought you were being delusional about some issues, but hey, that's my fault for thinking this place was frequented by grownups. Adults. How silly of me.

Just push the "Report Button" or send "Negative Rep"

Shortie wrote:Here's my summation of my time in this thread:

Guys: "Indignation! Mad about stuff! Liberals are responsible for dead puppies, tsunamis, hangnails, diaper rash, mosquito bites, and all other things bad."

Me: "Oh hai guys. I registered! I just have a few fellow up questions for you about your stance on all these issues and a few opinions of my own. I responded fully to each one of your points. Let's have a convo!"

Guys: "idiot liberal cretin slut!"

I maintain that if we don't quit being so nice to these evil people we will end up regretting it.  They are pure evil and should be treated accordingly.  So let's stop with the politeness and tell them what we really think of them.

Jammer wrote:

Shortie wrote:Here's my summation of my time in this thread:

Guys: "Indignation! Mad about stuff! Liberals are responsible for dead puppies, tsunamis, hangnails, diaper rash, mosquito bites, and all other things bad."

Me: "Oh hai guys. I registered! I just have a few fellow up questions for you about your stance on all these issues and a few opinions of my own. I responded fully to each one of your points. Let's have a convo!"

Guys: "idiot liberal cretin slut!"

I maintain that if we don't quit being so nice to these evil people we will end up regretting it.  They are pure evil and should be treated accordingly.  So let's stop with the politeness and tell them what we really think of them.

Never be nice to a liberal, they will screw you and not even kiss you before hand.

Skeptical wrote:

Shortie wrote:Soo...no discussion then? Just going to call me a slut and a string of other names and that's it? How very educated of you both.

I haven't called you any names, beyond saying that I thought you were being delusional about some issues, but hey, that's my fault for thinking this place was frequented by grownups. Adults. How silly of me.

Just push the "Report Button" or send "Negative Rep"

Ahh yes. The butthurt. I actually only ever neg repped when people did things like...oh I don't know, called me a slut for no good reason. I'll actually never understand why people got so up in arms about it anyway. I loved seeing all of my rep comments people left, positive or negative. Because rep didn't f*cking matter in the slightest!

I also only ever reported one person. AndyCapp. And that's because he creeper stalked me and put a photo of me up with some creepy comment like, "Oh Shortie. Look at those beautiful eyes. *shudder* That crossed a line. Other than that, I never complained. Everyone who spent time there knows that. If someone was banned for something they said to me, it's because other people reported it, or SDKid saw it on his own.

So yeah.