Re: Who's Selling Body Parts???

nightlight88 Fri Jul 24, 2015 1:43 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:In 2010 heterosexuals and drug users made up almost 40% of HIV cases. This is not just a gay man's disease. That bit of misinformation, started under the Reagan administration, is dangerous. If he had taken the proper precautions this epidemic would likely be far, far less than it is right now. He instead chose to do nothing.

The mechanics of anal sex undoubtedly make homosexuals more prone to spreading the disease, but what about the environmental factors of being a gay man in this country. How about not having the right to a legal monogamous relationship, not to mention one that is not accepted by so many in our society. This is also a disease rooted in our ghettos which much like our Indian yoreservations, have their own set of problems.

But yes, we are off topic. We really should get back to the fact that PP procures donated fetal tissue at a very likely loss, in an effort to cure disease. Maybe AIDS someday...

Factor out the drug users from the 40% and heterosexual transmission between straight partners is negligible. The CDC reported in 2010 that 78% of new HIV cases came from the man to man subgroup and 8% came from IV drug users. That's 86% for the math impaired. The majority of heterosexuals that contract HIV comes from sleeping with a bisexual partner (which is very prevalent in the Black community where black males engage in M2M sex on the "down-low") or IV drug users. Transmission between heterosexuals is hardly a statistical blip.

Dude, WTF are you talking about?!?

Looks like you are the only one not comprehending, and here i thought lefties were supposed to the the highly educated ones

I guess not

Dr. Evil Fri Jul 24, 2015 1:57 pm

nightlight88 wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:In 2010 heterosexuals and drug users made up almost 40% of HIV cases. This is not just a gay man's disease. That bit of misinformation, started under the Reagan administration, is dangerous. If he had taken the proper precautions this epidemic would likely be far, far less than it is right now. He instead chose to do nothing.

The mechanics of anal sex undoubtedly make homosexuals more prone to spreading the disease, but what about the environmental factors of being a gay man in this country. How about not having the right to a legal monogamous relationship, not to mention one that is not accepted by so many in our society. This is also a disease rooted in our ghettos which much like our Indian yoreservations, have their own set of problems.

But yes, we are off topic. We really should get back to the fact that PP procures donated fetal tissue at a very likely loss, in an effort to cure disease. Maybe AIDS someday...

Factor out the drug users from the 40% and heterosexual transmission between straight partners is negligible. The CDC reported in 2010 that 78% of new HIV cases came from the man to man subgroup and 8% came from IV drug users. That's 86% for the math impaired. The majority of heterosexuals that contract HIV comes from sleeping with a bisexual partner (which is very prevalent in the Black community where black males engage in M2M sex on the "down-low") or IV drug users. Transmission between heterosexuals is hardly a statistical blip.

Dude, WTF are you talking about?!?

Looks like you are the only one not comprehending, and here i thought lefties were supposed to the the highly educated ones

I guess not

What am I not comprehending?

BladeRunner Fri Jul 24, 2015 2:21 pm

Shortie's Ex Mon Jul 27, 2015 12:29 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Why do so many of you refer to sadomy as a bad thing? Aside from bestiality, it's really just part of a well balanced sex life.

Well my wife would disagree wit you. I can tell you this, if my wild weazel got anywhere near her ham flower, she'd slap me into next week.

Sadomy isn't just anal sex. It's also oral sex. It's really anything that is considered "unnatural", recreational sex could also fall under this category.

Just a hunch: Gomezz (as well as the knuckle dragging misogynist mouth breathers on this forum) have better chance of anal into the Mrs.' ham flower than to receive oral from the Mrs.

Shortie's Ex Mon Jul 27, 2015 12:39 pm

Ham Flower? wrote:Ham flower? Who calls a woman's butthole a ham flower? F'ing hipsters.

"Ham flower" certainly not limited to describing a woman's butthole.

"Gettin' some man ham" and "going into the ham flower" are pretty big euphemisms among the same sex set esp the guys.

A reflection of the latent homosexuality on this forum. A couple of these guys are not who they say they are. And BTW that's OK guys. Cool

Gomezz Adddams Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:03 pm

Shortie's Ex wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Why do so many of you refer to sadomy as a bad thing? Aside from bestiality, it's really just part of a well balanced sex life.

Well my wife would disagree wit you. I can tell you this, if my wild weazel got anywhere near her ham flower, she'd slap me into next week.

Sadomy isn't just anal sex. It's also oral sex. It's really anything that is considered "unnatural", recreational sex could also fall under this category.

Just a hunch: Gomezz (as well as the knuckle dragging misogynist mouth breathers on this forum) have better chance of anal into the Mrs.' ham flower than to receive oral from the Mrs.

Better hunch again fish kisser.

Skeptical Tue Jul 28, 2015 2:05 pm

Well, the saga of PP harvesting and selling aborted baby body parts continues!

[

Shortie's Ex Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:32 pm

Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Why do so many of you refer to sadomy as a bad thing? Aside from bestiality, it's really just part of a well balanced sex life.

Well my wife would disagree wit you. I can tell you this, if my wild weazel got anywhere near her ham flower, she'd slap me into next week.

Sadomy isn't just anal sex. It's also oral sex. It's really anything that is considered "unnatural", recreational sex could also fall under this category.

Just a hunch: Gomezz (as well as the knuckle dragging misogynist mouth breathers on this forum) have better chance of anal into the Mrs.' ham flower than to receive oral from the Mrs.

Better hunch again fish kisser.

So you get neither Gomezz ?

Shortie's Ex Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:33 pm

Shortie's Ex wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Why do so many of you refer to sadomy as a bad thing? Aside from bestiality, it's really just part of a well balanced sex life.

Well my wife would disagree wit you. I can tell you this, if my wild weazel got anywhere near her ham flower, she'd slap me into next week.

Sadomy isn't just anal sex. It's also oral sex. It's really anything that is considered "unnatural", recreational sex could also fall under this category.

Just a hunch: Gomezz (as well as the knuckle dragging misogynist mouth breathers on this forum) have better chance of anal into the Mrs.' ham flower than to receive oral from the Mrs.

Any further rebuttal from any among the Fellatio Five ?

BladeRunner Wed Jul 29, 2015 1:38 pm

Skeptical wrote:

Well, the saga of PP harvesting and selling aborted baby body parts continues!

[

Yep, they're a great organization, At least that's what our resident abortion Dr (Jones) says.

Gomezz Adddams Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:01 pm

Shortie's Ex wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Why do so many of you refer to sadomy as a bad thing? Aside from bestiality, it's really just part of a well balanced sex life.

Well my wife would disagree wit you. I can tell you this, if my wild weazel got anywhere near her ham flower, she'd slap me into next week.

Sadomy isn't just anal sex. It's also oral sex. It's really anything that is considered "unnatural", recreational sex could also fall under this category.

Just a hunch: Gomezz (as well as the knuckle dragging misogynist mouth breathers on this forum) have better chance of anal into the Mrs.' ham flower than to receive oral from the Mrs.

Better hunch again fish kisser.

So you get neither Gomezz ?

Another swing and a miss. I thought lesbos played better ball than you are. clown

nightlight88 Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:33 pm

BladeRunner wrote:
Skeptical wrote:

Well, the saga of PP harvesting and selling aborted baby body parts continues!

[

Yep, they're a great organization, At least that's what our resident abortion Dr (Jones) says.

Gives a whole new meaning to HUMAN RESOURCES.

nightlight88 Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:38 pm

Shortie's Ex wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Why do so many of you refer to sadomy as a bad thing? Aside from bestiality, it's really just part of a well balanced sex life.

Well my wife would disagree wit you. I can tell you this, if my wild weazel got anywhere near her ham flower, she'd slap me into next week.

Sadomy isn't just anal sex. It's also oral sex. It's really anything that is considered "unnatural", recreational sex could also fall under this category.

Just a hunch: Gomezz (as well as the knuckle dragging misogynist mouth breathers on this forum) have better chance of anal into the Mrs.' ham flower than to receive oral from the Mrs.

Any further rebuttal from any among the Fellatio Five ?

Fellatio five?????

Your pus filled mind must have reverted to Sodomite Central where the qu-eers ran rampant. The male fellatio experts that hang around here are the lefties. You know, twinkies, liberal and dr mengele.

Jammer Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:44 pm

nightlight88 wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Why do so many of you refer to sadomy as a bad thing? Aside from bestiality, it's really just part of a well balanced sex life.

Well my wife would disagree wit you. I can tell you this, if my wild weazel got anywhere near her ham flower, she'd slap me into next week.

Sadomy isn't just anal sex. It's also oral sex. It's really anything that is considered "unnatural", recreational sex could also fall under this category.

Just a hunch: Gomezz (as well as the knuckle dragging misogynist mouth breathers on this forum) have better chance of anal into the Mrs.' ham flower than to receive oral from the Mrs.

Any further rebuttal from any among the Fellatio Five ?

Fellatio five?????

Your pus filled mind must have reverted to Sodomite Central where the qu-eers ran rampant. The male fellatio experts that hang around here are the lefties. You know, twinkies, liberal and dr mengele.

From the sounds of things, that would be her first pus filled event.

Dr. Evil Wed Jul 29, 2015 4:56 pm

BladeRunner wrote:
Skeptical wrote:

Well, the saga of PP harvesting and selling aborted baby body parts continues!

[

Yep, they're a great organization, At least that's what our resident abortion Dr (Jones) says.

I must have a different link. All I saw was the same lame video with a thick gravy layer of unverifiable sensationalism poured on top. Apparently not enough "shock and awe" the first time around. I'm sure the next video will feature interviews with the aborted fetuses.

Dr. Evil Wed Jul 29, 2015 5:12 pm

Shortie's Ex wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Why do so many of you refer to sadomy as a bad thing? Aside from bestiality, it's really just part of a well balanced sex life.

Well my wife would disagree wit you. I can tell you this, if my wild weazel got anywhere near her ham flower, she'd slap me into next week.

Sadomy isn't just anal sex. It's also oral sex. It's really anything that is considered "unnatural", recreational sex could also fall under this category.

Just a hunch: Gomezz (as well as the knuckle dragging misogynist mouth breathers on this forum) have better chance of anal into the Mrs.' ham flower than to receive oral from the Mrs.

I always wonder about men who mock homosexuals for performing oral sex on their partner. They are either:

A. Not getting oral sex from their wife. Which, sucks to be you...

B. Are no longer married, which is understandable...

C. Are being atrociously disrespectful to their wife who is performing those same acts on them. Or any woman unlucky enough to have ever performed oral sex on you for that fact.

I remember when I was much younger I had a friend who, when he got drunk, always went on and on about how disgusting it would be to suck a diick. I would always watch his girlfriend's face when he started in on his little spat. She would get furious.

Gomezz Adddams Wed Jul 29, 2015 7:32 pm

I bet this conversation is repeated over and over and over again in the Jones Hovel

Who's Selling Body Parts??? - Page 6 You_wa10

Skeptical Wed Jul 29, 2015 7:42 pm

Dr. Jones wrote: I remember when I was much younger I had a friend who, when he got drunk, always went on and on about how disgusting it would be to suck a diick. I would always watch her face when he started in on his little spat. She would get furious.

Was this friend a he or a she or a he/she or a she/he or ?????????

Gomezz Adddams Wed Jul 29, 2015 7:50 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote: I remember when I was much younger I had a friend who, when he got drunk, always went on and on about how disgusting it would be to suck a diick. I would always watch her face when he started in on his little spat. She would get furious.

Was this friend a he or a she or a he/she or a she/he or ?????????

Family dog. Woof!

Dr. Evil Wed Jul 29, 2015 8:24 pm

Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote: I remember when I was much younger I had a friend who, when he got drunk, always went on and on about how disgusting it would be to suck a diick. I would always watch her face when he started in on his little spat. She would get furious.

Was this friend a he or a she or a he/she or a she/he or ?????????

Sorry my bad

Darth Cheney Wed Jul 29, 2015 8:53 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote: I remember when I was much younger I had a friend who, when he got drunk, always went on and on about how disgusting it would be to suck a diick. I would always watch her face when he started in on his little spat. She would get furious.

Was this friend a he or a she or a he/she or a she/he or ?????????

Sorry my bad

That's the problem with lying non-stop.

Dr. Evil Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:02 pm

Darth Cheney wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Skeptical wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote: I remember when I was much younger I had a friend who, when he got drunk, always went on and on about how disgusting it would be to suck a diick. I would always watch her face when he started in on his little spat. She would get furious.

Was this friend a he or a she or a he/she or a she/he or ?????????

Sorry my bad

That's the problem with lying non-stop.

I changed two flippin' words for clarification.... Rolling Eyes

Shortie's Ex Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:34 pm

Dr. Jones wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Jones wrote:Why do so many of you refer to sadomy as a bad thing? Aside from bestiality, it's really just part of a well balanced sex life.

Well my wife would disagree wit you. I can tell you this, if my wild weazel got anywhere near her ham flower, she'd slap me into next week.

Sadomy isn't just anal sex. It's also oral sex. It's really anything that is considered "unnatural", recreational sex could also fall under this category.

Just a hunch: Gomezz (as well as the knuckle dragging misogynist mouth breathers on this forum) have better chance of anal into the Mrs.' ham flower than to receive oral from the Mrs.

I always wonder about men who mock homosexuals for performing oral sex on their partner. They are either:

A. Not getting oral sex from their wife. Which, sucks to be you...

B. Are no longer married, which is understandable...

C. Are being atrociously disrespectful to their wife who is performing those same acts on them. Or any woman unlucky enough to have ever performed oral sex on you for that fact.

I remember when I was much younger I had a friend who, when he got drunk, always went on and on about how disgusting it would be to suck a diick. I would always watch his girlfriend's face when he started in on his little spat. She would get furious.

If I get 2 choices I'm picking B and C (the "or any women" option) to apply to these guys.

Shortie's Ex Wed Jul 29, 2015 9:42 pm

Gomezz Adddams wrote:I bet this conversation is repeated over and over and over again in the Jones Hovel

Oh Gomezz. Peanut butter ? Really ?

With your knowledge about seafood (you DO reciprocate for the Mrs don't you ?), I would have expected some comment about a tuna sundae. They really are delicious. Even without the banana (if you know what I mean). Wink

Dr. Evil Thu Jul 30, 2015 3:42 pm

It appears that this hatchet job has now broken the law and released another video. I wonder if this one talks about the contract that they offered to PP which PP refused to sign because it was unethical and illegal. I doubt it. PP has also recently been hacked. Who are the real criminals here??

New Planned Parenthood video released despite court order
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/30/politics/planned-parenthood-fourth-video/index.html

Sponsored content