Who's Selling Body Parts???

Dr. Jones wrote:As referenced in this article from the Mayo Clinic, the costs associated with procurement in tissue/organ donation are passed on to the recipient.  It's a standard practice.

Myth: My family will be charged if I donate my organs.

Fact: The organ donor's family is never charged for donating. The family is charged for the cost of all final efforts to save your life, and those costs are sometimes misinterpreted as costs related to organ donation. Costs for organ removal go to the transplant recipient.

http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/consumer-health/in-depth/organ-donation/art-20047529

Again, there's nothing to see here, move along.

Dr. Jones wrote:As referenced in this article from the Mayo Clinic, the costs associated with procurement in tissue/organ donation are passed on to the recipient.  It's a standard practice.

Myth: My family will be charged if I donate my organs.

Fact: The organ donor's family is never charged for donating. The family is charged for the cost of all final efforts to save your life, and those costs are sometimes misinterpreted as costs related to organ donation. Costs for organ removal go to the transplant recipient.

http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/consumer-health/in-depth/organ-donation/art-20047529

Again, there's nothing to see here, move along.

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:As referenced in this article from the Mayo Clinic, the costs associated with procurement in tissue/organ donation are passed on to the recipient.  It's a standard practice.

Myth: My family will be charged if I donate my organs.

Fact: The organ donor's family is never charged for donating. The family is charged for the cost of all final efforts to save your life, and those costs are sometimes misinterpreted as costs related to organ donation. Costs for organ removal go to the transplant recipient.

http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/consumer-health/in-depth/organ-donation/art-20047529

Again, there's nothing to see here, move along.

HMMM, so now Mayo Clinic is performing abortions and selling body parts from aborted fetuses?  Do tell, Planned Parenthood has competition.

When did they start doing this Dr. Jones Mengele ?

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:As referenced in this article from the Mayo Clinic, the costs associated with procurement in tissue/organ donation are passed on to the recipient.  It's a standard practice.

Myth: My family will be charged if I donate my organs.

Fact: The organ donor's family is never charged for donating. The family is charged for the cost of all final efforts to save your life, and those costs are sometimes misinterpreted as costs related to organ donation. Costs for organ removal go to the transplant recipient.

http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/consumer-health/in-depth/organ-donation/art-20047529

Again, there's nothing to see here, move along.

Where did I say that?

Dr. Jones wrote:Here's an interesting article pertaining to the costs associated with organ transplantation.  Pay close attention to the "procurement" column in the graph.  Wow that's a lot of zeros.      


http://www.transplantliving.org/before-the-transplant/financing-a-transplant/the-costs/

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:Here's an interesting article pertaining to the costs associated with organ transplantation.  Pay close attention to the "procurement" column in the graph.  Wow that's a lot of zeros.      


http://www.transplantliving.org/before-the-transplant/financing-a-transplant/the-costs/

No doubt it is about the Planned Parenthood getting rich by selling harvested on demand aborted baby body parts !

Dr. Jones wrote:What was it that the lady in the video was asking for again?  I forgot.

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:What was it that the lady in the video was asking for again?  I forgot.

Check it out and get back to us, Dr Mengele

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:What was it that the lady in the video was asking for again?  I forgot.

Check it out and get back to us, Dr Mengele

I already wasted nearly eight and a half minutes of my life watching it the first time..  Certainly not going to waste anther.

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:As referenced in this article from the Mayo Clinic, the costs associated with procurement in tissue/organ donation are passed on to the recipient.  It's a standard practice.

Myth: My family will be charged if I donate my organs.

Fact: The organ donor's family is never charged for donating. The family is charged for the cost of all final efforts to save your life, and those costs are sometimes misinterpreted as costs related to organ donation. Costs for organ removal go to the transplant recipient.

http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/consumer-health/in-depth/organ-donation/art-20047529

Again, there's nothing to see here, move along.

Where did I say that?

Wasn't that your your purpose in dragging into a discussion of Planned Plannedhood very possibly selling harvested on demand body parts from aborted fetuses an article concerning adults asking questions at Mayo Clinic about donating organs?

Ummm... no.

Heck I got asked if I wanted to be an organ donor when I renewed my driver's license and perhaps you did too, so why not post a link to that?

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:What was it that the lady in the video was asking for again?  I forgot.

Check it out and get back to us, Dr Mengele

I already wasted nearly eight and a half minutes of my life watching it the first time..  Certainly not going to waste anther.

Stay ignorant, its a free country !

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:What was it that the lady in the video was asking for again?  I forgot.

Check it out and get back to us, Dr Mengele

I already wasted nearly eight and a half minutes of my life watching it the first time..  Certainly not going to waste anther.

Stay ignorant, its a free country !

Cute.

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:What was it that the lady in the video was asking for again?  I forgot.

Check it out and get back to us, Dr Mengele

I already wasted nearly eight and a half minutes of my life watching it the first time..  Certainly not going to waste anther.

Stay ignorant, its a free country !

Cute.

One thing is for sure.

All those who approve and support abortion on demand as birth control including the harvesting of and selling body parts of aborted babies has already been born to a person who did not approve of abortion.  This includes you Dr. Jones Mengele!

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Federal fetal research law makes it illegal “to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects interstate commerce”

The “valuable consideration” is defined to exclude “reasonable payments associated with the transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue.” Essentially the abortion industry cannot exceed costs associated with transporting, implanting, processing, preserving, monitoring, and assuring quality control, or storage. So unlike the organ transplant industry, which does profit from doing transplants, there should be no profit involved in fetal tissue transactions.

Then why is there price haggling and price negotiations going on? Costs should be relatively known and fixed. Rents, lab costs, salaries of lab techs, transportation costs, storage etc. Essentially in pricing these tissues one could use the labor theory of value (see Adam Smith and Karl Marx) to set prices. However the abortion industry appears to be using marginal utility pricing along with supply and demand as businesses do to maximize profits indicating that they are exceeding their "costs" and profiting from the sale.

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Federal fetal research law makes it illegal “to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects interstate commerce”

The “valuable consideration” is defined to exclude “reasonable payments associated with the transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue.” Essentially the abortion industry cannot exceed costs associated with transporting, implanting, processing, preserving, monitoring, and assuring quality control, or storage. So unlike the organ transplant industry, which does profit from doing transplants, there should be no profit involved in fetal tissue transactions.

Then why is there price haggling and price negotiations going on? Costs should be relatively known and fixed. Rents, lab costs, salaries of lab techs, transportation costs, storage etc. Essentially in pricing these tissues one could use the labor theory of value (see Adam Smith and Karl Marx) to set prices. However the abortion industry appears to be using marginal utility pricing along with supply and demand as businesses do to maximize profits indicating that they are exceeding their "costs" and profiting from the sale.

With standard surgical room fees soaring into the $100's/minute range it would suggest that PP is actually losing money at the "haggled" price.  That would in essence throw both pricing theories right out the window.  Certainly far short of any sort of "valuable consideration".

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Federal fetal research law makes it illegal “to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects interstate commerce”

The “valuable consideration” is defined to exclude “reasonable payments associated with the transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue.” Essentially the abortion industry cannot exceed costs associated with transporting, implanting, processing, preserving, monitoring, and assuring quality control, or storage. So unlike the organ transplant industry, which does profit from doing transplants, there should be no profit involved in fetal tissue transactions.

Then why is there price haggling and price negotiations going on? Costs should be relatively known and fixed. Rents, lab costs, salaries of lab techs, transportation costs, storage etc. Essentially in pricing these tissues one could use the labor theory of value (see Adam Smith and Karl Marx) to set prices. However the abortion industry appears to be using marginal utility pricing along with supply and demand as businesses do to maximize profits indicating that they are exceeding their "costs" and profiting from the sale.

With standard surgical room fees soaring into the $100's/minute range it would suggest that PP is actually losing money at the "haggled" price.  That would in essence throw both pricing theories right out the window.  Certainly far short of any sort of "valuable consideration".

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Federal fetal research law makes it illegal “to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects interstate commerce”

The “valuable consideration” is defined to exclude “reasonable payments associated with the transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue.” Essentially the abortion industry cannot exceed costs associated with transporting, implanting, processing, preserving, monitoring, and assuring quality control, or storage. So unlike the organ transplant industry, which does profit from doing transplants, there should be no profit involved in fetal tissue transactions.

Then why is there price haggling and price negotiations going on? Costs should be relatively known and fixed. Rents, lab costs, salaries of lab techs, transportation costs, storage etc. Essentially in pricing these tissues one could use the labor theory of value (see Adam Smith and Karl Marx) to set prices. However the abortion industry appears to be using marginal utility pricing along with supply and demand as businesses do to maximize profits indicating that they are exceeding their "costs" and profiting from the sale.

With standard surgical room fees soaring into the $100's/minute range it would suggest that PP is actually losing money at the "haggled" price.  That would in essence throw both pricing theories right out the window.  Certainly far short of any sort of "valuable consideration".

I see. You're from the Pull-It-Out-of-My Ass Theory of Pricing School. Not surprising since you're a gubmint teat sucker.

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Federal fetal research law makes it illegal “to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects interstate commerce”

The “valuable consideration” is defined to exclude “reasonable payments associated with the transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue.” Essentially the abortion industry cannot exceed costs associated with transporting, implanting, processing, preserving, monitoring, and assuring quality control, or storage. So unlike the organ transplant industry, which does profit from doing transplants, there should be no profit involved in fetal tissue transactions.

Then why is there price haggling and price negotiations going on? Costs should be relatively known and fixed. Rents, lab costs, salaries of lab techs, transportation costs, storage etc. Essentially in pricing these tissues one could use the labor theory of value (see Adam Smith and Karl Marx) to set prices. However the abortion industry appears to be using marginal utility pricing along with supply and demand as businesses do to maximize profits indicating that they are exceeding their "costs" and profiting from the sale.

With standard surgical room fees soaring into the $100's/minute range it would suggest that PP is actually losing money at the "haggled" price.  That would in essence throw both pricing theories right out the window.  Certainly far short of any sort of "valuable consideration".

Darth Cheney wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Federal fetal research law makes it illegal “to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects interstate commerce”

The “valuable consideration” is defined to exclude “reasonable payments associated with the transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue.” Essentially the abortion industry cannot exceed costs associated with transporting, implanting, processing, preserving, monitoring, and assuring quality control, or storage. So unlike the organ transplant industry, which does profit from doing transplants, there should be no profit involved in fetal tissue transactions.

Then why is there price haggling and price negotiations going on? Costs should be relatively known and fixed. Rents, lab costs, salaries of lab techs, transportation costs, storage etc. Essentially in pricing these tissues one could use the labor theory of value (see Adam Smith and Karl Marx) to set prices. However the abortion industry appears to be using marginal utility pricing along with supply and demand as businesses do to maximize profits indicating that they are exceeding their "costs" and profiting from the sale.

With standard surgical room fees soaring into the $100's/minute range it would suggest that PP is actually losing money at the "haggled" price.  That would in essence throw both pricing theories right out the window.  Certainly far short of any sort of "valuable consideration".

Obamacare is taking care of that dumb ass...don't your remember?

Dr. Jones wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Federal fetal research law makes it illegal “to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects interstate commerce”

The “valuable consideration” is defined to exclude “reasonable payments associated with the transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue.” Essentially the abortion industry cannot exceed costs associated with transporting, implanting, processing, preserving, monitoring, and assuring quality control, or storage. So unlike the organ transplant industry, which does profit from doing transplants, there should be no profit involved in fetal tissue transactions.

Then why is there price haggling and price negotiations going on? Costs should be relatively known and fixed. Rents, lab costs, salaries of lab techs, transportation costs, storage etc. Essentially in pricing these tissues one could use the labor theory of value (see Adam Smith and Karl Marx) to set prices. However the abortion industry appears to be using marginal utility pricing along with supply and demand as businesses do to maximize profits indicating that they are exceeding their "costs" and profiting from the sale.

With standard surgical room fees soaring into the $100's/minute range it would suggest that PP is actually losing money at the "haggled" price.  That would in essence throw both pricing theories right out the window.  Certainly far short of any sort of "valuable consideration".

Obamacare is taking care of that dumb ass...don't your remember?

You seem upset.  Is something bothering you?

nightlight88 wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Darth Cheney wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:Federal fetal research law makes it illegal “to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects interstate commerce”

The “valuable consideration” is defined to exclude “reasonable payments associated with the transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal tissue.” Essentially the abortion industry cannot exceed costs associated with transporting, implanting, processing, preserving, monitoring, and assuring quality control, or storage. So unlike the organ transplant industry, which does profit from doing transplants, there should be no profit involved in fetal tissue transactions.

Then why is there price haggling and price negotiations going on? Costs should be relatively known and fixed. Rents, lab costs, salaries of lab techs, transportation costs, storage etc. Essentially in pricing these tissues one could use the labor theory of value (see Adam Smith and Karl Marx) to set prices. However the abortion industry appears to be using marginal utility pricing along with supply and demand as businesses do to maximize profits indicating that they are exceeding their "costs" and profiting from the sale.

With standard surgical room fees soaring into the $100's/minute range it would suggest that PP is actually losing money at the "haggled" price.  That would in essence throw both pricing theories right out the window.  Certainly far short of any sort of "valuable consideration".

Obamacare is taking care of that dumb ass...don't your remember?

You seem upset.  Is something bothering you?

Unlike you Dr Mengela, some people are bothered and upset at the wanton killing of unborn babies for convenience.