Religious Freedom meets Civil Rights

"the separate and equal station"

I don't think that phrase means what you think it means.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:"the separate and equal station"

I don't think that phrase means what you think it means.

Of course it doesn’t mean what he thinks it means.  The cretin is a total moron and is not capable of understanding anything so complex.

But that really doesn’t matter; the cretin is also a liberal.  Therefore those things MEAN WHAT HE WANTS THEM TO MEAN.   That simple progressive socialist principle makes life so much easier for the useful idiots.

Dr. Jones wrote:

So now you believe everything Kasich says??????????????

Have you cast your absentee ballot for him?

Dr. Jones wrote:

BFD. Did you know Kasich's dad was a postman. True story.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

BFD. Did you know Kasich's dad was a postman. True story.

Is that true? This is the first I have ever heard that fact.

The plot thickens:

Clergy defy ban, come out as LGBT
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/09/living/methodist-clergy-lgbt/index.html

Dr. Jones wrote:The plot thickens:

Clergy defy ban, come out as LGBT
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/09/living/methodist-clergy-lgbt/index.html

And this has to do with religious freedom how?

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:The plot thickens:

Clergy defy ban, come out as LGBT
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/09/living/methodist-clergy-lgbt/index.html

And this has to do with religious freedom how?

Because parishioners and leaders will have to choose between following their long held religious convictions, and treating these people with dignity.  The exact same thing the rest of the thread is about. *faceplant*

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:The plot thickens:

Clergy defy ban, come out as LGBT
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/09/living/methodist-clergy-lgbt/index.html

And this has to do with religious freedom how?

Because parishioners and leaders will have to choose between following their long held religious convictions, and treating these people with dignity.  The exact same thing the rest of the thread is about. *faceplant*

If homosexual clergy wish to defy church doctrine/ideology fine. But don't expect to claim 1st Amendment religious freedom protection because the government is forbidden to interfere under the Free Exercise clause. This is an internal church matter. The homosexual clergy are free to go and practice in a denomination that allows for homosexuals.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:The plot thickens:

Clergy defy ban, come out as LGBT
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/09/living/methodist-clergy-lgbt/index.html

And this has to do with religious freedom how?

Because parishioners and leaders will have to choose between following their long held religious convictions, and treating these people with dignity.  The exact same thing the rest of the thread is about. *faceplant*

If homosexual clergy wish to defy church doctrine/ideology fine. But don't expect to claim 1st Amendment religious freedom protection because the government is forbidden to interfere under the Free Exercise clause. This is an internal church matter. The homosexual clergy are free to go and practice in a denomination that allows for homosexuals.

If this is too much for you to wrap your head around,  and you want yet another thread on this subject you'll have to let me know...

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

BFD. Did you know Kasich's dad was a postman. True story.

No way!

Really?

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:The plot thickens:

Clergy defy ban, come out as LGBT
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/09/living/methodist-clergy-lgbt/index.html

And this has to do with religious freedom how?

Because parishioners and leaders will have to choose between following their long held religious convictions, and treating these people with dignity.  The exact same thing the rest of the thread is about. *faceplant*

If homosexual clergy wish to defy church doctrine/ideology fine. But don't expect to claim 1st Amendment religious freedom protection because the government is forbidden to interfere under the Free Exercise clause. This is an internal church matter. The homosexual clergy are free to go and practice in a denomination that allows for homosexuals.

If this is too much for you to wrap your head around,  and you want yet another thread on this subject you'll have to let me know...

Not a problem at all understanding this situation. It is not a Constitutional question of Religious Freedom. It falls entirely under the purview of the Methodist General Conference. I would suggest that if the homosexual clergy wish to pursue their beliefs and their lifestyle then they should seek out some other denomination that will welcome them.

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:The plot thickens:

Clergy defy ban, come out as LGBT
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/09/living/methodist-clergy-lgbt/index.html

And this has to do with religious freedom how?

Because parishioners and leaders will have to choose between following their long held religious convictions, and treating these people with dignity.  The exact same thing the rest of the thread is about. *faceplant*

If homosexual clergy wish to defy church doctrine/ideology fine. But don't expect to claim 1st Amendment religious freedom protection because the government is forbidden to interfere under the Free Exercise clause. This is an internal church matter. The homosexual clergy are free to go and practice in a denomination that allows for homosexuals.

If this is too much for you to wrap your head around,  and you want yet another thread on this subject you'll have to let me know...

Not a problem at all understanding this situation. It is not a Constitutional question of Religious Freedom. It falls entirely under the purview of the Methodist General Conference. I would suggest that if the homosexual clergy wish to pursue their beliefs and their lifestyle then they should seek out some other denomination that will welcome them.

Aren't the left all about CHOICE? A kweer minister wants to come out, his/her choice. The congregation wants to kick his/her butt down the road, their choice.

nightlight88 wrote:  Aren't the left all about CHOICE?  A kweer minister wants to come out, his/her choice. The congregation wants to kick his/her butt down the road, their choice.

Then how soon will the screams of HOMOPHOBIA fill the air if and when the congregation tells the minister to hit the road ??

Dr. Jones wrote:

Gomezz Adddams wrote:

Dr. Jones wrote:The plot thickens:

Clergy defy ban, come out as LGBT
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/09/living/methodist-clergy-lgbt/index.html

And this has to do with religious freedom how?

Because parishioners and leaders will have to choose between following their long held religious convictions, and treating these people with dignity.  The exact same thing the rest of the thread is about. *faceplant*

Dignity? There freaks of nature that ordinarily would die off as they offer no benefit to society. Smearing your Johnson with feces and humping a hairy bung hole does not conger up images of dignity. Nice try fraggot.

You guys are being pretty tough on these deviant PERVERTS.  Take a look at Jackoff Jones below.  He has come out as the poster pervert for homosexuals and transgenders.



His campaign slogan is:  SET MY PEOPLE FREE





Aren't these people something special?

I'll not judge you for your mocking attitude.  THAT judgement for you Mr Jammer will be before our Lord.

Shortie's Ex wrote:I'll not judge you for your mocking attitude.  THAT judgement for you Mr Jammer will be before our Lord.

I am perfectly willing to take my chances. However, based upon what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah, I think the perverts in the pictures might be in for some trouble. But at least you will have company.

Shortie's Ex wrote:I'll not judge you for your mocking attitude.  THAT judgement for you Mr Jammer will be before our Lord.

How does anyone defend these freaks of nature? What the hell is wrong with you!

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:I'll not judge you for your mocking attitude.  THAT judgement for you Mr Jammer will be before our Lord.

I am perfectly willing to take my chances.  However, based upon what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah, I think the perverts in the pictures might be in for some trouble.  But at least you will have company.  

Pride (arrogance) is listed right alongside murder and sexual immorality.  Mark Chapter 7.  Good luck and God bless.

Darth Cheney wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:I'll not judge you for your mocking attitude.  THAT judgement for you Mr Jammer will be before our Lord.

How does anyone defend these freaks of nature? What the hell is wrong with you!

The Lord defends and protects all of his children.

I am giving spiritual advice to a couple of the pious posters on JSI. How weird is that ?

Shortie's Ex wrote:I am giving spiritual advice to a couple of the pious posters on JSI.  How weird is that ?

It is often said "Free advice is worth what you pay for it.". Don't be so patronizing.

Shortie's Ex wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Shortie's Ex wrote:I'll not judge you for your mocking attitude.  THAT judgement for you Mr Jammer will be before our Lord.

I am perfectly willing to take my chances.  However, based upon what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah, I think the perverts in the pictures might be in for some trouble.  But at least you will have company.  

Pride (arrogance) is listed right alongside murder and sexual immorality.  Mark Chapter 7.  Good luck and God bless.

Unfortunately for you, stupidity stands on its own.