Name that liberal sin

Skeptical wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Skeptical wrote:Why do you queers always try to push the notion nature prefers homosexuality for continuing the human species?

Can you show me where I have said anything like that or do you want to admit that you're bearing false witness?

Skeptical wrote:BTW, it is obvious you never read all parts of the article you so triumphantly rejected or else you wouldn't have made this asinine comment, "if soy makes you gay most all of southeast Asia would face a serious under population problem."  It is also obvious you failed to comprehend the context of the Scientific American article.

Another poster has it correct,  you are nothing but a lying through your ass progressive scumbag who pats themselves on the back for twisting others words and attributing your thought and words to others.

Please feel free to show me where the article says that soy makes people gay.

You were just turned off by the title of the article and failed to read let alone comprehend

P.S.: Soy sauce is fine. Unlike soy milk, it’s perfectly safe because it’s fermented, which changes its molecular structure. Miso, natto and tempeh are also OK, but avoid tofu.

OR this

But the worst victims of soy are babies. Per kilogram of body weight, the average Japanese in 2000 ate 0.47 milligrams of soy isoflavones daily, while the average U.S. baby drinking soy formula got 6.25 milligrams.

or you wouldn't have made this idiotic claim, "if soy makes you gay most all of southeast Asia would face a serious under population problem."

But the worst victims of soy are babies. Per kilogram of body weight, the average Japanese in 2000 ate 0.47 milligrams of soy isoflavones daily, while the average U.S. baby drinking soy formula got 6.25 milligrams.

Paquette wrote:

But the worst victims of soy are babies. Per kilogram of body weight, the average Japanese in 2000 ate 0.47 milligrams of soy isoflavones daily, while the average U.S. baby drinking soy formula got 6.25 milligrams.

This little quote is interesting. Comparing the diet of an infant who gets all nutrition from one source to adults who receive their nutrition from many sources seems more than just a little dishonest.

While I understand that you object to anyone who trusts science I will trust the scientists who advocate breast feeding whenever possible. There are times when formulas of any variety are unavoidable but they should be a last resort.

Yet nothing you have posted has even come close to addressing the topic at hand, the idiotic claim that eating soy will make people gay.

Paquette wrote:

Skeptical wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:Remember...Paquette once said he could be wrong.

Well  "the trust science advocate" doesn't allow for anyone else but Paquette to form opinions from science!

Case in point is his/her downright rejection of Jim Rutz (deceased) article he so vehemently proclaimed as wrong.

If he/she had only read all the parts of the article and the entire Scientific American article he/she would, well ... could have understood how Mr Rutz expressed the opinion he did, rational people would have.

Paquette was too offended by, Soy is making kids 'gay'  that there was no way it could be read objectively and the point being made was similar to another source of info that Paquette just may dismiss as wrong.

Phytoestrogens or isoflavones represent the most serious problem with soy infant formula. These estrogen-like compounds have the potential to disrupt baby’s hormonal system for life.

According to the Weston A. Price Foundation:


Toxicologists estimate that an infant exclusively fed soy formula receives the estrogenic equivalent of at least five birth control pills per day. By contrast, almost no phytoestrogens have been detected in dairy-based infant formula or in human milk, even when the mother consumes soy products. A recent study found that babies fed soy-based formula had 13,000 to 22,0000 times more isoflavones in their blood than babies fed milk-based formula.

Flooding of an infant boy’s bloodstream with female like hormones has the potential to cause serious developmental problems at puberty.  During the first few months of life, a baby boy has testosterone levels that could be as high as that of an adult male.   This “testosterone surge” readies the baby boy’s hormonal system for puberty both for normal development of the sexual organs and also patterns of male behavior

Could soy infant formula be responsible for the increasing problem of boys where physical maturation is delayed or even completely absent with retarded development of the sexual organs?

http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/why-soy-formula-even-organic-is-so-dangerous-for-babies/

Do you really think that says that eating soy will make people gay?

Do you think that eating soy will make people gay?

Jammer wrote:It is a well known fact that being a progressive liberal or actually even associating with a progressive liberal will make you a homosexual pervert.  But I know you progressive liberals like the warm and fuzzy SPIN name of "gay" that you use instead of PERVERT.

Paquette wrote:

Jammer wrote:It is a well known fact that being a progressive liberal or actually even associating with a progressive liberal will make you a homosexual pervert.  But I know you progressive liberals like the warm and fuzzy SPIN name of "gay" that you use instead of PERVERT.

OMG, since you are associating with progressive liberals that means you're a...  

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Skeptical wrote:
Just as predicted!

Paquette was so offended by, Soy is making kids 'gay'that there was no way he/she could be read it objectively or similar articles in Scientific American or Healthy Home economist about the dangers of feeding soy to infants that is compelled to lash out and deflect.  

Paquette wrote:

Jammer wrote:It is a well known fact that being a progressive liberal or actually even associating with a progressive liberal will make you a homosexual pervert.  But I know you progressive liberals like the warm and fuzzy SPIN name of "gay" that you use instead of PERVERT.

OMG, since you are associating with progressive liberals that means you're a...  

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Paquette wrote:

Skeptical wrote:
Just as predicted!

Paquette was so offended by, Soy is making kids 'gay'that there was no way he/she could be read it objectively or similar articles in Scientific American or Healthy Home economist about the dangers of feeding soy to infants that is compelled to lash out and deflect.  

Seriously, do you think either one of those articles says that eating soy will make you gay?

I have no problem with the very limited studies that strongly suggest that soy formulas are not a good idea but that does not have anything to do with this topic.

But "just as predicted" you will continue to badger on with this off topic rant and assorted attempts at insults to run away from the fact that you have nothing to back up your original argument. Off topic tangents coupled with a stubborn refusal to address the topic only shows that you are well aware that you have nothing to support your argument.

Do you have anything on topic to bolster your support for the claim that eating soy will make kids gay?

Phytoestrogens or isoflavones represent the most serious problem with soy infant formula. These estrogen-like compounds have the potential to disrupt baby’s hormonal system for life.

According to the Weston A. Price Foundation:


Toxicologists estimate that an infant exclusively fed soy formula receives the estrogenic equivalent of at least five birth control pills per day. By contrast, almost no phytoestrogens have been detected in dairy-based infant formula or in human milk, even when the mother consumes soy products. A recent study found that babies fed soy-based formula had 13,000 to 22,0000 times more isoflavones in their blood than babies fed milk-based formula.

Flooding of an infant boy’s bloodstream with female like hormones has the potential to cause serious developmental problems at puberty.  During the first few months of life, a baby boy has testosterone levels that could be as high as that of an adult male.   This “testosterone surge” readies the baby boy’s hormonal system for puberty both for normal development of the sexual organs and also patterns of male behavior.

Jammer wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Jammer wrote:It is a well known fact that being a progressive liberal or actually even associating with a progressive liberal will make you a homosexual pervert.  But I know you progressive liberals like the warm and fuzzy SPIN name of "gay" that you use instead of PERVERT.

OMG, since you are associating with progressive liberals that means you're a...  

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

HAHA - that was precious.  But the joke is on you.  I have the new upgraded platinum version of Norton 360 on my computer.  Not only does it protect me from viruses and identity theft but also intrusion from progressive liberal PERVERSION.

Paquette wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Jammer wrote:It is a well known fact that being a progressive liberal or actually even associating with a progressive liberal will make you a homosexual pervert.  But I know you progressive liberals like the warm and fuzzy SPIN name of "gay" that you use instead of PERVERT.

OMG, since you are associating with progressive liberals that means you're a...  

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

HAHA - that was precious.  But the joke is on you.  I have the new upgraded platinum version of Norton 360 on my computer.  Not only does it protect me from viruses and identity theft but also intrusion from progressive liberal PERVERSION.

Well played.

Fine print: You might want to explain the concept of humor to skep, I don't think he gets it.

Paquette wrote:

But the worst victims of soy are babies. Per kilogram of body weight, the average Japanese in 2000 ate 0.47 milligrams of soy isoflavones daily, while the average U.S. baby drinking soy formula got 6.25 milligrams.

This little quote is interesting. Comparing the diet of an infant who gets all nutrition from one source to adults who receive their nutrition from many sources seems more than just a little dishonest.

But the worst victims of soy are babies. Per kilogram of body weight, the average Japanese adult weighing 70 kg in 2000 ate 32.9 milligrams of soy isoflavones daily, while the average U.S. baby weighing 6 kg drinking soy formula got 37.5 milligrams.

Jammer wrote:

BladeRunner wrote:Remember...Paquette once said he could be wrong.

??????

Paquette = John Thornton  ????

"Say it ain't so, Joe"

Jammer wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Jammer wrote:It is a well known fact that being a progressive liberal or actually even associating with a progressive liberal will make you a homosexual pervert.  But I know you progressive liberals like the warm and fuzzy SPIN name of "gay" that you use instead of PERVERT.

OMG, since you are associating with progressive liberals that means you're a...  

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

HAHA - that was precious.  But the joke is on you.  I have the new upgraded platinum version of Norton 360 on my computer.  Not only does it protect me from viruses and identity theft but also intrusion from progressive liberal PERVERSION.

Paquette wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Jammer wrote:It is a well known fact that being a progressive liberal or actually even associating with a progressive liberal will make you a homosexual pervert.  But I know you progressive liberals like the warm and fuzzy SPIN name of "gay" that you use instead of PERVERT.

OMG, since you are associating with progressive liberals that means you're a...  

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

HAHA - that was precious.  But the joke is on you.  I have the new upgraded platinum version of Norton 360 on my computer.  Not only does it protect me from viruses and identity theft but also intrusion from progressive liberal PERVERSION.

I was going to let you go on living in your blissful ignorance but considering your newfound fondness for me I thought I owed it to you to set you straight.

You won't hear this from the main stream media but six months ago Symantec quietly removed their gay filter to complete their campaign as one of the leading warriors for the gay agenda.

By now you may have started to notice some of the effects of your newly unsheltered life. Have you noticed a lessing of your nausea level at the thought of musicals? Have you considered growing a mustache (the universal sign of out of the closet homosexuals) or a goatee (the devious trick of the homosexual recruiters used to simulate the vertical smile)? Have you started lifting weights or working out? Have you recently experienced even a slight amount of tolerance towards any liberals or those suspected of being liberal? Hopefully you haven't been thinking about redecorating or looked at color swatches, if you have, it's quite possibly too late.

But if you haven't caught the redecorating bug or worse yet, grown a goatee, it's not too late to fight back. You'll need to enter into a good gay conversion program that will seclude you with a bunch of other men who are inflicted with the same disease. There you will undergo intensive therapy in the macho arts like chest bumping, towel snapping in the communal shower and wrestling. After many months of being away from the feminizing influences of women you'll stand a good chance of once again becoming a macho, macho man.

Darth Cheney wrote:I thought you had to be born "that way". Are you proposing we will all be running around having anal sex with little boys or at least wish we were? Is there nothing we can do to prevent speaking with a lisp, holding our wrists limp, and gravitating towards being an interior decorator.

Darth Cheney wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Jammer wrote:

Paquette wrote:

Jammer wrote:It is a well known fact that being a progressive liberal or actually even associating with a progressive liberal will make you a homosexual pervert.  But I know you progressive liberals like the warm and fuzzy SPIN name of "gay" that you use instead of PERVERT.

OMG, since you are associating with progressive liberals that means you're a...  

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

HAHA - that was precious.  But the joke is on you.  I have the new upgraded platinum version of Norton 360 on my computer.  Not only does it protect me from viruses and identity theft but also intrusion from progressive liberal PERVERSION.

I was going to let you go on living in your blissful ignorance but considering your newfound fondness for me I thought I owed it to you to set you straight.

You won't hear this from the main stream media but six months ago Symantec quietly removed their gay filter to complete their campaign as one of the leading warriors for the gay agenda.

By now you may have started to notice some of the effects of your newly unsheltered life. Have you noticed a lessing of your nausea level at the thought of musicals? Have you considered growing a mustache (the universal sign of out of the closet homosexuals) or a goatee (the devious trick of the homosexual recruiters used to simulate the vertical smile)? Have you started lifting weights or working out? Have you recently experienced even a slight amount of tolerance towards any liberals or those suspected of being liberal? Hopefully you haven't been thinking about redecorating or looked at color swatches, if you have, it's quite possibly too late.

But if you haven't caught the redecorating bug or worse yet, grown a goatee, it's not too late to fight back. You'll need to enter into a good gay conversion program that will seclude you with a bunch of other men who are inflicted with the same disease. There you will undergo intensive therapy in the macho arts like chest bumping, towel snapping in the communal shower and wrestling. After many months of being away from the feminizing influences of women you'll stand a good chance of once again becoming a macho, macho man.

I thought you had to be born "that way". Are you proposing we will all be running around having anal sex with little boys or at least wish we were? Is there nothing we can do to prevent speaking with a lisp, holding our wrists limp, and gravitating towards being an interior decorator.

Paquette wrote: I was going to let you go on living in your blissful ignorance but considering your newfound fondness for me I thought I owed it to you to set you straight.

You won't hear this from the main stream media but six months ago Symantec quietly removed their gay filter to complete their campaign as one of the leading warriors for the gay agenda.

By now you may have started to notice some of the effects of your newly unsheltered life. Have you noticed a lessing of your nausea level at the thought of musicals? Have you considered growing a mustache (the universal sign of out of the closet homosexuals) or a goatee (the devious trick of the homosexual recruiters used to simulate the vertical smile)? Have you started lifting weights or working out? Have you recently experienced even a slight amount of tolerance towards any liberals or those suspected of being liberal? Hopefully you haven't been thinking about redecorating or looked at color swatches, if you have, it's quite possibly too late.

But if you haven't caught the redecorating bug or worse yet, grown a goatee, it's not too late to fight back. You'll need to enter into a good gay   conversion program that will seclude you with a bunch of other men who are inflicted with the same disease. There you will undergo intensive therapy in the macho arts like chest bumping, towel snapping in the communal shower and wrestling. After many months of being away from the feminizing influences of women you'll stand a good chance of once again becoming a macho, macho man.

Jammer wrote:You need to stop with the progressive socialist SPIN, there is NOTHING gay about these people.  They are sad, disgusting, despicable losers.  

The word GAY is a progressive socialist strategy to take control of the narrative and make these disgusting people seem not only normal but just like the people in Lake Wobegon "where all the women are strong, all the men are good-looking, and all the children are above average".  But it ain't working.

The English language gave us several words that are perfect descriptors of these sad people and those words include:  PERVERT  -   DEVIANT

Jammer wrote:Finer print:  He is a good guy, just getting a little old and perhaps doesn't get out into the real world as much as he should.  Cut him some slack.

Future US History Books wrote:Progressive socialist politicians and their policies led to the collapse of the greatest country this planet has ever seen.

Jammer wrote:"Shite hits the fan" or how future history books will probably record the events heading our way:

Future US History Books wrote:Progressive socialist politicians and their policies led to the collapse of the greatest country this planet has ever seen.

The fan keeps blowing:

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102459024


And it appears that a bunch of people are thinking about throwing some shite at it:

http://seekingalpha.com/article/2915656-could-these-events-threaten-the-u-s-dollars-reserve-status

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/tag/reserve-currency


On this May 1 “socialist day” when all the progressive liberals are either rioting or paying homage to their FUNDING fathers, many good Americans are sitting at home unaware of the shite that is about to hit the fan.

Only YOU can help prevent liberalism  

Jammer wrote:Liberal sins are once again on display for all to see:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/102694868?trknav=homestack:topnews:1

Progressive liberals are the biggest threat this country faces.  Their principles and the policies and programs that emanate from them are nothing short of destructive.  These destructive cretins made sure that long term unemployment benefits were handed out like candy.   As a result, millions of lazy degenerate liberals chose to collect unemployment rather than actively seek a job.

The result is that this idiotic progressive liberal “feel good” program has created a class of people who will probably never be able to work again.  For the small percentage who might ever attempt to seek employment they will find their jobs skills so obsolete that they will not qualify for any type of meaningful employment.

But not to worry because the dumbass liberal living down the street from all of us will insist that the minimum wage be increased because it is so unfair that these low skilled cretins will not be able to raise a family on a minimum wage job.  Therefore we will have to greatly increase the minimum wage which will then lead to more unemployed people out of work.

But once again not to worry as there will be a progressive liberal principle that will require the hardworking Americans to pay higher taxes because it is so unfair that they have a good job with a livable wage that it is their duty to pay “their fair share”.  

Run don’t walk to the nearest liberal and “spit in their face” and let the dumbass know just what kind of a jackass they are.