Re: Random Questions for Conservatives

nightlight88 Mon Mar 20, 2017 12:15 pm

Dr. Evil wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Evil wrote:What did you guys think of that Super Bowl commercial Frederick Douglass did to celebrate black history month? He's being recognized more and more all the time.

Missed it. I was watching some black guy sticking it to your wife on some internet porno channel.

That was me actually. Spray on tan gone wrong incident. We decided to make the best of it and film a porn. What did you think? Did you beat off?

Did you have to use a strap-on? Limp-dick liberals like you always need assistant in the manhood department.

Dr. Evil Sat Apr 01, 2017 8:06 am

You want to help the coal industry? Quit lying to them by pretending they are still viable.

Clicker Sat Apr 01, 2017 8:12 am

Dr. Evil wrote:You want to help the coal industry? Quit lying to them by pretending they are still viable.

As we travel around the country we see many coal fired generating plants and hundreds of coal bearing trains. I don't see where you think it is not viable. It would take a hundred years to fully eliminate coal fired generating stations from the country.

Dr. Evil Sat Apr 01, 2017 8:24 am

Clicker wrote:
Dr. Evil wrote:You want to help the coal industry? Quit lying to them by pretending they are still viable.

As we travel around the country we see many coal fired generating plants and hundreds of coal bearing trains. I don't see where you think it is not viable. It would take a hundred years to fully eliminate coal fired generating stations from the country.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://money.cnn.com/2017/01/24/investing/trump-coal-epa-regulation/&ved=0ahUKEwjypNz0rIPTAhUD4IMKHRWGDMsQFggcMAA&usg=AFQjCNEmJXsrv9gE8xItawUFfCSp_bhgyA&sig2=4W_-B2aK97ix5hNehsfvqA

Jammer Sat Apr 01, 2017 10:39 am

Clicker wrote:
Dr. Evil wrote:You want to help the coal industry? Quit lying to them by pretending they are still viable.

As we travel around the country we see many coal fired generating plants and hundreds of coal bearing trains. I don't see where you think it is not viable. It would take a hundred years to fully eliminate coal fired generating stations from the country.

You are right. However, in the short term there will be competitive pressure on coal by the abundance of natural gas. We are drowning in natural gas and it has become not only extremely cheap but it is so clean and easy to use. Here is a price trend chart that shows the huge price decline since 2008.

Random Questions for Conservatives - Page 6 GraphEngine.ashx?z=f&gf=110558.USD

Random Questions for Conservatives - Page 6 GraphEngine.ashx?z=f&gf=110558.USD

I find this dramatic increase in the supply and availability of natural gas not only enjoyable but also amusing. In the early 1970's all the liberal wingnuts were running around screaming that we were out running out of natural gas and we only had enough for another 10 or 20 years until it would be completely depleted.

The ridiculous demonrats passed all kinds of laws and regulations concerning the use of natural gas. At the time, large industry was using natural gas as an interruptible source of energy. The country did not have excessive storage capability so in the winter when residential usage was higher, gas companies could "interrupt" the supply to industrial plants in order to have adequate supply available for residential users.

Well the demonrats passed laws prohibiting industrial customers from using ANY natural gas. In fact, they were required to rip their gas lines out to prevent and illegal usage. They said this was necessary not only because of the limited natural gas reserves but because that we were ENTERING THE NEXT ICE AGE. The liberal wingnuts were certain that we had global cooling occurring as a result of pollution. I can still remember the cover story in a magazine that read "The Coming Ice Age" or something similar.

That just shows you what these idiot liberal actually know. They are LYING MORONS and should never ever be believed. Nothing they say is accurate.

My personal opinion on coal is that it will have a fit in our energy plans for the next 100 years plus. I would expect it to be under competitive pressure from natural gas for quite awhile but I would not be surprised that at some point many years down the road it will make a resurgence. However, that may well be beyond any of our "shelf life".

The one thing I am absolutely 100% positive of is that YOU SHOULD NEVER EVER LISTEN TO ANYTHING A LIBERAL SAYS , LET ALONE BELIEVE THEM.

Jammer Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:10 pm

Hey Clicker, I probably should have mentioned Natural Gas Liquids in my comment above. That is something that doesn't get all that much press. However, I suspect that in the coming years as President Trump brings back millions of manufacturing jobs to the US it is going to play a larger role in our energy picture.

Random Questions for Conservatives - Page 6 NGL-Barrel-Breakdown

Random Questions for Conservatives - Page 6 NGL-Barrel-Breakdown

Clicker Sat Apr 01, 2017 1:04 pm

Jammer wrote:Hey Clicker, I probably should have mentioned Natural Gas Liquids in my comment above. That is something that doesn't get all that much press. However, I suspect that in the coming years as President Trump brings back millions of manufacturing jobs to the US it is going to play a larger role in our energy picture.

Problem is, anything that is petrochemical or non-renewable will not be acceptable to the looney Libs. I'd bet that if a cure for cancer was found in a barrel of oil they'd still not accept drilling for it. What they don't realize is oil is renewable, bury all the libs on the planet in one place and in a few million years we'll have a new source..........

Jammer Sat Apr 01, 2017 8:29 pm

Cicker wrote: Problem is, anything that is petrochemical or non-renewable will not be acceptable to the looney Libs. I'd bet that if a cure for cancer was found in a barrel of oil they'd still not accept drilling for it. What they don't realize is oil is renewable, bury all the libs on the planet in one place and in a few million years we'll have a new source..........

As usual, you are correct on all points. In fact some could argue that fossil fuels have been the most important development in the history of mankind. Without it, the entire world would probably still be using horses to get around. Hydrocarbons have driven the greatest expansion of prosperity the world has ever seen.

As for the part on how oil is really a renewable, you are correct on that point as well. I suggest that the world needs to get working on that sooner rather than later.

Clicker Sun Apr 02, 2017 8:06 am

Jammer wrote:
Cicker wrote: Problem is, anything that is petrochemical or non-renewable will not be acceptable to the looney Libs. I'd bet that if a cure for cancer was found in a barrel of oil they'd still not accept drilling for it. What they don't realize is oil is renewable, bury all the libs on the planet in one place and in a few million years we'll have a new source..........

As usual, you are correct on all points. In fact some could argue that fossil fuels have been the most important development in the history of mankind. Without it, the entire world would probably still be using horses to get around. Hydrocarbons have driven the greatest expansion of prosperity the world has ever seen.

As for the part on how oil is really a renewable, you are correct on that point as well. I suggest that the world needs to get working on that sooner rather than later.

On a serious note, we have been using the methane generated in landfills to run generators for over 50 years now. In Corona, Ca, where I used to live, there is one that has been running since I moved there in 1976.

Jammer Sun Apr 02, 2017 11:36 am

Clicker wrote:
Jammer wrote:
Cicker wrote: Problem is, anything that is petrochemical or non-renewable will not be acceptable to the looney Libs. I'd bet that if a cure for cancer was found in a barrel of oil they'd still not accept drilling for it. What they don't realize is oil is renewable, bury all the libs on the planet in one place and in a few million years we'll have a new source..........

As usual, you are correct on all points. In fact some could argue that fossil fuels have been the most important development in the history of mankind. Without it, the entire world would probably still be using horses to get around. Hydrocarbons have driven the greatest expansion of prosperity the world has ever seen.

As for the part on how oil is really a renewable, you are correct on that point as well. I suggest that the world needs to get working on that sooner rather than later.
On a serious note, we have been using the methane generated in landfills to run generators for over 50 years now. In Corona, Ca, where I used to live, there is one that has been running since I moved there in 1976.

You bring up a very good point, the methane that is generated not only in municipal landfills but also the methane generated in wastewater treatment plants. You always hear the ridiculous loony liberals whining about global warming from burning fossil fuels. However, the methane generated in landfills and wastewater treatment plants is something like 100 times more harmful to global warming than an equivalent amount of CO2. But when you pay attention to these fat ass liberals you will see they produce the biggest garbage footprint on your street and they generate about double the amount of crap flushed down the toilet thanks to free food from their EBT cards. Why don't they whine about that?

Anyhow back to the landfill gas and wastewater treatment plant gas, yes they produce a fair amount of energy even though the BTU content of the resulting methane is only about half of what natural gas is. But a much bigger value than the energy they produce is the efforts by CONSERVATIVE minded individuals in mitigating the waste generated by irresponsible liberals and reducing the effects of global warming. And how do they do it, they burn it just like we do with coal, oil and natural gas. And on top of that, we actually do end up with some so-called "renewable" energy.

LIBERALS ARE NOT ONLY EVIL THEY ARE COMPLETE IDIOTS

Clicker Sun Apr 02, 2017 6:59 pm

We just completed our annual trip to California for the winter. I don't remember where we saw it but there was a sewage processing facility that had domes over the pools and a pipe coming out of the sides and running into a building. the shed had an exhaust pipe coming out the roof.

Jammer Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:25 pm

Clicker wrote:We just completed our annual trip to California for the winter. I don't remember where we saw it but there was a sewage processing facility that had domes over the pools and a pipe coming out of the sides and running into a building. the shed had an exhaust pipe coming out the roof.

There is a HUGE plant in Carson that has a HUGE gas recovery system. However, I'm sure there are smaller plants around the metro area. I remember one from years ago when we were driving down a 2 lane highway. I think it was when we were out visiting the Reagan library. I want to say it was west of the Library, maybe the Moorpark area. But my memory is real fuzzy so that is just a guess. Anyhow it was a smaller system with only a couple of digestors.

Dr. Evil Wed Apr 05, 2017 5:59 pm

Since polygamy is practiced in the bible, why do many Christians claim that marriage is just between a man and a woman?

Gomezz Adddams Wed Apr 05, 2017 7:57 pm

Dr. Evil wrote:Since polygamy is practiced in the bible, why do many Christians claim that marriage is just between a man and a woman?

Most of the polygamy was practiced by the Joooos/Hebrooos not Christians. The New Testament is mostly silent on the issue and that there are verses in the NT that can be read as meaning one man/one woman. Jesus said, "Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?"

Dr. Evil Thu Apr 06, 2017 12:33 pm

Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Evil wrote:Since polygamy is practiced in the bible, why do many Christians claim that marriage is just between a man and a woman?

Most of the polygamy was practiced by the Joooos/Hebrooos not Christians. The New Testament is mostly silent on the issue and that there are verses in the NT that can be read as meaning one man/one woman. Jesus said, "Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?"

Oh joy and rapture.... more cherry picking of the old testament.... Rolling Eyes

Is the story of creation in Genesis on the chopping block too? Or does that still fit your narrative??

Is Abraham Christian enough for you? Not only did he have multiple wives, but he also married his sister. How about Moses? You certainly aren't going to throw him under the bus? Are you??

Shortie's Ex Fri Apr 07, 2017 1:17 pm

Dr. Evil wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Evil wrote:Since polygamy is practiced in the bible, why do many Christians claim that marriage is just between a man and a woman?

Most of the polygamy was practiced by the Joooos/Hebrooos not Christians. The New Testament is mostly silent on the issue and that there are verses in the NT that can be read as meaning one man/one woman. Jesus said, "Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?"

Oh joy and rapture.... more cherry picking of the old testament.... Is the story of creation in Genesis on the chopping block too? Or does that still fit your narrative??

Is Abraham Christian enough for you? Not only did he have multiple wives, but he also married his sister. How about Moses? You certainly aren't going to throw him under the bus? Are you??

Oh Dr Evil, I thought Abraham married his brother's widow. In any event, after the death of his brother, Abraham was obliged by Jewish law to come into her and spill his seed on the ground.

Shortie's Ex Fri Apr 07, 2017 1:25 pm

Shortie's Ex wrote:In any event, after the death of his brother, Abraham was obliged by Jewish law to come into her and spill his seed on the ground.

I hesitate to provide this information because I suspect a few of the posters to JSI have fantasies that their make-believe and now-deceased brother was married to Ann Margaret and they are now fulfilling family responsibility in this way. #fapmaterial

Gomezz Adddams Fri Apr 07, 2017 1:52 pm

Shortie's Ex wrote:
Dr. Evil wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Evil wrote:Since polygamy is practiced in the bible, why do many Christians claim that marriage is just between a man and a woman?

Most of the polygamy was practiced by the Joooos/Hebrooos not Christians. The New Testament is mostly silent on the issue and that there are verses in the NT that can be read as meaning one man/one woman. Jesus said, "Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?"

Oh joy and rapture.... more cherry picking of the old testament.... Is the story of creation in Genesis on the chopping block too? Or does that still fit your narrative??

Is Abraham Christian enough for you? Not only did he have multiple wives, but he also married his sister. How about Moses? You certainly aren't going to throw him under the bus? Are you??

Oh Dr Evil, I thought Abraham married his brother's widow. In any event, after the death of his brother, Abraham was obliged by Jewish law to come into her and spill his seed on the ground.

You are confusing Abraham with Onan. In a levirate marriage, the next oldest brother takes the widow (Tamar) as his wife in order to provide a male heir for the dead brother. The child is considered to be of the dead brothers and would be able to claim a firstborn's inheritance. However if there were no heir then Onan would have inherited his oldest brothers property since he was the oldest surviving son. Onan wanted the property and so pulled out when he ejaculated. This angered God and Onan was put to death. Tamar went on to become a prostitute and slept with her father-in-law Judah while disguised, became pregnant and gave birth to twins Perez and Zerah. Perez later became king of Persia.

As to the story of Abraham and Sarah, there are interpretations that claim that in the ancient semitic languages, the word "sister" also meant "cousin". Sarah could have been Abraham's cousin under these interpretations.

However if she was really his half-sister, their marriage preceded Biblical laws found in Leviticus which forbad this type of marriage.

Dr. Evil Fri Apr 07, 2017 9:45 pm

Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Shortie's Ex wrote:
Dr. Evil wrote:
Gomezz Adddams wrote:
Dr. Evil wrote:Since polygamy is practiced in the bible, why do many Christians claim that marriage is just between a man and a woman?

Most of the polygamy was practiced by the Joooos/Hebrooos not Christians. The New Testament is mostly silent on the issue and that there are verses in the NT that can be read as meaning one man/one woman. Jesus said, "Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?"

Oh joy and rapture.... more cherry picking of the old testament.... Is the story of creation in Genesis on the chopping block too? Or does that still fit your narrative??

Is Abraham Christian enough for you? Not only did he have multiple wives, but he also married his sister. How about Moses? You certainly aren't going to throw him under the bus? Are you??

Oh Dr Evil, I thought Abraham married his brother's widow. In any event, after the death of his brother, Abraham was obliged by Jewish law to come into her and spill his seed on the ground.

You are confusing Abraham with Onan. In a levirate marriage, the next oldest brother takes the widow (Tamar) as his wife in order to provide a male heir for the dead brother. The child is considered to be of the dead brothers and would be able to claim a firstborn's inheritance. However if there were no heir then Onan would have inherited his oldest brothers property since he was the oldest surviving son. Onan wanted the property and so pulled out when he ejaculated. This angered God and Onan was put to death. Tamar went on to become a prostitute and slept with her father-in-law Judah while disguised, became pregnant and gave birth to twins Perez and Zerah. Perez later became king of Persia.

As to the story of Abraham and Sarah, there are interpretations that claim that in the ancient semitic languages, the word "sister" also meant "cousin". Sarah could have been Abraham's cousin under these interpretations.

However if she was really his half-sister, their marriage preceded Biblical laws found in Leviticus which forbad this type of marriage.

Yaaaa, we all know the old testament is pretty "flexible"... Wink

What's the big deal anyways?? Sisters? Cousins? Incest? Multiple wives? Forcing slaves, or their wives to have sex? Killing off entire villages except the hot chicks, so you can shag them? Rape as long as you get married afterwards? It's all good as long as you're not gay right? Cuz that would be a sin. Rolling Eyes

Dr. Evil Sun Apr 09, 2017 7:58 am

Lots of good questions here:

http://www.voices4hillary.com/when-trump-voters-say-they-suffered-for-8-years-under-obama-heres-the--2280512289.html

Dr. Evil Sun Apr 09, 2017 1:48 pm

I was talking to my dad and a friend of his yesterday who is a life long Democrat. He voted for Trump because he thought he could shake things up. He said he feels sorry for Trump.

What is there to feel sorry for Trump about?

If my dad's friend wants to feel sorry for someone, he should feel sorry for himself. For buying into Trump's line of BS. I think that there were a lot of good people, like my dad's friend who weren't just rubber stamping the PGiC*. They genuinely thought that we could have had a president that was to the US as Jesse Ventura was to MN. Drumpf isn't that guy.

This was painfully obvious to me during the election. The part that pissed me off was that even now after everything that has transpired since November 9, he can still say that he feels sorry for him. And that nobody really understood how hard it would be to shake up Washington. BS!!! This man child hasn't even tried! It's been business as usual in Washinhton with an extra hearty hand job under the table from snakes like Putin and certain special interests like the fossil fuel industries, with special twist of FU to anybody who doesn't like it. No, Trump doesn't deserve anybody's pitty.

Dr. Evil Mon Apr 10, 2017 12:14 am

What do you think about this?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2017/04/09/politics/trump-outpacing-obama-golf/index.html

Gomezz Adddams Mon Apr 10, 2017 12:20 am

Dr. Evil wrote:I was talking to my dad and a friend of his yesterday who is a life long Democrat. He voted for Trump because he thought he could shake things up. He said he feels sorry for Trump.

What is there to feel sorry for Trump about?

If my dad's friend wants to feel sorry for someone, he should feel sorry for himself. For buying into Trump's line of BS. I think that there were a lot of good people, like my dad's friend who weren't just rubber stamping the PGiC*. They genuinely thought that we could have had a president that was to the US as Jesse Ventura was to MN. Drumpf isn't that guy.

This was painfully obvious to me during the election. The part that pissed me off was that even now after everything that has transpired since November 9, he can still say that he feels sorry for him. And that nobody really understood how hard it would be to shake up Washington. BS!!! This man child hasn't even tried! It's been business as usual in Washinhton with an extra hearty hand job under the table from snakes like Putin and certain special interests like the fossil fuel industries, with special twist of FU to anybody who doesn't like it. No, Trump doesn't deserve anybody's pitty.

So, what are your real feelings?

Dr. Evil Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:47 pm

OK, so it's not really a question...

Random Questions for Conservatives - Page 6 Fb_img11

Dr. Evil Tue Apr 11, 2017 12:46 pm

What happened to Kellyanne Conway? Did they have her committed someplace? Cement shoes?

Sponsored content